Mugged - Steven Crowder announces divorce’ from wife Hilary
(www.the-sun.com)
Comments (58)
sorted by:
Lose your job, lose your wife. A tale as old as no fault divorce.
When a woman sees her ATM machine stop spitting out as much cash as it used to, this is what she does. Every man knows it.
It's almost like women have no loyalty.
From Crowder's clip, they have been separated since 2021.
Weirdly, they had twins in August 2021...wonder which happened first.
It was a one side telling but the way he talked it was after the birth. She probably has post partum or is doped up on drugs
So, GBS...twins...divorce? Seem like a bunch of shit to deal with while hormonal.
What job are you talking about?
Crowder was on Beck's payroll at the Blaze for a while, and then had to shut down the show for a time after leaving.
How much less money is Steven making now?
1 Hilary worth less.
Suddenly all his bitching about white suburban women the last few years makes more sense
A lot of that is an op by conservatives to drive a wedge between white men and women. It's why they will harp on white liberal women but won't talk shit about far more liberal demographics.
Certain posters on this board also employ this tactic.
(((certain posters)))
Eh the worst and most liberal women are man-free. Married women as a demographic are not Democrats.
This must be a calculated PR reveal timed to distract and garner sympathy after the disastrous tell-all by former co-host Dave Landau on Michael Malice's podcast outing Crowder as a narcissistic control freak, right?
Yeah, not really. People are still watching him, a lot. A million views on Rumble on almost every video.
Just watched the opening where he talks about it, his wife was the one that pushed the button back in 2021 and there were a lot of people that knew but kept it quiet basically for his kids safety.
But looks like some in 2023 tried to use this info as a way to threaten and/or intimidate (and example Crowder provided was a Daily Wire host). At least this is a further example of which ones were scum and not as I bet Alex Jones knew but kept quiet, same with Quartering and even some more on the fence commentators knew but decided to keep this quiet unless Crowder wanted to address it himself.
Quarter Black knew too. Him telling people to fuck off because he wasn't going to reveal sensitive info about Steven actually makes me appreciate it more that he refused to jump in during the DW shit
With the recent Landau stuff going down, Quarterblack just seems better by virtue of not getting involved.
Filed for divorce I imagine.
I think it's less that it took so long to move forward and moreso that it was just kept under wraps for various reasons.
Points at Elon and his kids
It's easy to see why he'd want to keep any information that pertains to his kids even divorce out of the public.
On his video today, first segment - https://rumble.com/v2kcyxm--live-daily-show-louder-with-crowder.html
Isn’t it pretty well known that Crowder is half a fag? It was a marriage of convenience, nothing more.
Half a fag? Is that like only the tip in his bunghole? Or is this training for prison gay?
The tardy policy that Landau talked about is insane. Honestly, if you have to add that to the contract, you’re better off not hiring that person at all.
Yeah I watched that too. I think it definitely lines up with stuff I’ve heard about Crowder, and probably explains what happened to Not Gay Jared and Sven.
What explains what happened to Owen Benjamin?
Owen is also a fucking psycho cult leader.
Owen’s crazy but I wouldn’t be too surprised if Crowder also pushed him away, he seems to be extremely threatened by anyone funnier than him.
Bro Owen is a drug addicted schizo and he lied about publicly known info
Arkancide, don't mess with hillary, ever
Bet he'll still shill marriage and "supporting women" after.
I don't know enough about Crowder/Daily Wire deal because I'm not a fan of either entity. Crowder's an asshole and the Daily Wire is textbook Orthodox Zionist news.
...But I'm reminded of Louis Rossman and the contract he was offered by VICE. He rejected it, told them he wasn't interested in working with them. He uploaded a youtube video where he went through the contract to explain just what they had tried to rope him into - a deal that would've seen them own absolutely everything and put them in full control of him.
'Of course the first offer is one sided, you're supposed to negotiate!!!!'
Rossman told them to get the fuck out of his sight because he could not ever trust someone that would ever try to fuck him over to that degree. He did not want to ever work with a company that considered it morally acceptable to make an attempt to just utterly screw someone over if they weren't business savvy, because it's a guarantee that they would try to fuck him as much as they could not matter what.
Pretty much. people need to stop letting people try to screw them in private
Yep. I have no love for Crowder but the DW deserved to be put on blast for offering such a shitty contract enshrining being in the good graces of big tech firms that they are supposedly at odds with as big monetary incentives in the contract.
Why do you think that Jester alt you're talking to is taking their side? He wants the conservative media personalities under Daily Wire for narrative control.
Ok dude
No sympathy for Jews that attempt to offload all the risk onto their talent. Especially because Ben Shapiro actually started out supporting cancel culture. It's a good thing for dirty laundry to air out once in a while. It gives your average conservative a reality check.
Now Steven is kind of a douche, but I'm glad he made himself useful.
Maybe, maybe not. But if it was a kamikaze mission then I salute him.
Do you also hate it when conservative outlets grift off the cause or is that OK because it's mostly out of sight, out of mind?
I found the problem here, you don't care about the Daily Wire and I don't care about Crowder.
Did anybody see that interview Dave Landau did with Michael Malice? If half the shit Dave said about Steven is true then he’s a greedier Jew than Ben and Co. could ever hope to be.
That’s unfortunate. I enjoyed Dave immensely on the show.
I haven’t watched since last year when they had the whole contract debacle.
Not only that but Crowder knifed the Daily Wire in the back to try to make himself look like some sort of "rebel outlaw" when he was just being a shitty person who betrayed people who saw him as a friend, all just to get a little more hype to make a quick buck.
I will never understand why it was Crowder betraying his friends to publish an insultingly bad contract, but not those friends betraying Crowder when they offered that contract. The usual response is “it’s an opening offer! You’re supposed to negotiate!” but are you telling me that if you drew up a contract to employ one of your friends, you would intentionally draw up an awful, one-sided deal for that friend under the assumption they’ll go through and throw out every bad clause? Then what, you slap them on the back and go “good job buddy, you saw through my prank, let’s go a drink!” If they were foolish enough to accept, would you stop them from doing so? I know you’re a lawyer, but that still seems harsh.
Not only that, but crowder was proven right about how horrendous the contract was with Walsh getting the YouTube axe. Unless Walsh just lost 30% of his income doing so, DW offered an immensely shitty deal intentionally.
That’s the most insane part. The Daily Wire claims to be an anti-(excessive) censorship, conservative, non-mainstream organization, and then it makes a contract where its employees are greatly punished for running afoul of the most mainstream of leftist standards. There’s “unfair opening offer” and then there’s “structured in such a way as to fundamentally undercut the entire alleged premise of the company.”
All questions of “fairness,” “negotiation,” and “friendship” aside, that contract deserved to be leaked simply because it exposes a massive open question about The Daily Wire’s commitment to its claimed values. Hypothetically, if I join “the organization to oppose cannibalism” and someone leaks that they stop their employees from saying cannibalism is bad, I don’t give a shit about whether the leaker was betraying trust or not and I don’t care if it turns out you can get permission to say cannibalism is bad if you ask nicely—I want to know why the organization to oppose cannibalism ever took that position on any level.
For some of those people it's because (((DW))) can do no wrong.