Like just about anything out of hollywood, the plot of Who Framed Roger Rabbit is anti-capitalist. The movie of course has Doom as a serial killer who wants to genocide his own people for profit, but to hear him explain his actions in his own words, he is going to replace a broken, bankrupt transportation system with a massive road building project that will bring business, opportunity and prosperity to the city.
Standing in his way is Toon Town, a neighbourhood he'd need to bulldoze for his project. What is in this neighbourhood? Brainless miscreants, problem whackjobs. Even Eddie Valiant, the toons' principle advocate, fucking hates Toon Town and can't stand being in it - because in just a few minutes there, you'll be assaulted, sexually harassed, people will try to kill you, and they'll think it's funny. ...Sounds a lot like your average white liberal and their relationship with black neighborhoods, doesn't it? No accident. The toons are black people - minstrels who perform on TV and stage for white liberal amusement.
Judge Doom's principal crime is not murder - that's just the justification for painting him as 'the bad guy'. His crime is that he is a capitalist, and believes in order over chaos.
because the scientists are actually really shitty at this and aren't capable of making true designer babies. the birth success rate in this article was only 7 out of 600 attempts, and I'd bet you most of those who survived to birth had fucked up DNA which will cause them to die early deaths.
the best science can do is take a bunch of your sperm and your wife's eggs and just throw them together, then take the embryos and test them to see how they turned out, and give you a printout multiple choice of which kid you want to implant. So you can basically reroll your kid a limited number of times and pick the best one. But this is very expensive and so only a plaything for the rich, and its not like you can know how smart the kid will be or most other traits.
What I am suggesting is of course farfetched and with the caveat of complete finnancial and moral abandonment until these ends were achieved.
I feel as though if we're going to play God, we might aswell go for the gusto and do extremely inhumane things in the name of getting to that point rather than stopping at giving Bill and Steve a kid to ruin.
I 100% believe that the Ubermensch is coming the moment he is possible and I 100% support it. It doesn't matter who tries to stop it. All it takes is China or North Korea doing it first, then the whole world would have to follow or else be utterly subjugated.
It just isn't possible and will not be possible unless and until scientists can develop a process to edit human DNA that is extremely precise and error-free. We are nowhere near that yet, and given the extremely small atomic scales of this editing, it is probably a long way off. Doing this kind of editing is much, much easier with shit like viruses (even the Chinese in Wuhan could do it!) because viruses are very simple and it doesn't matter if your method only works 1/1000 times.
We also need a much better understanding of the genetic basis of human intelligence. It isn't like hair or eye color, it is an extremely complex interconnection of numerous factors. We will need to have accurate intelligence testing better than what we have now (possibly AI driven) and then feed those test results + DNA of the test taker into a giant AI database, and have an AI build a model of human intelligence based on that. Then we can keep making "maximum brainpower" men and feeding their results back into the AI until we reach the limits of human capacity. Of course other shit like height & physical attractiveness are child's play by comparison so those will be solved much sooner.
Well this'll get shut down FAST. Having women be able to procreate without men works in the current leftist systems thanks to bigger bias to be part of a group.
If men can procreate without women, you've just removed the BIGGEST card feminism has to play. Forget 'this'll be used to encourage gays', men without any need to entertain women's desires destroys all leftist claims to power.
Locking women out of the process is all fun and games until men who want kids are expected to date troons since biological children no longer require a real woman. Solving the feminism problem is a much better way to go.
I think the end goal is likely to end the family unit entirely. Communal raising facilities where men who are trained in the raising of boys can raise your kids while you go to work. Then biological women will be entirely eradicated from the species to be replaced by fully robotic women who men can use as sex slaves without any qualms about "morals".
Maybe I'm just old fashioned, but I'm skeptical that a robot could replace a woman from a physical intimacy perspective. A conversational AI getting good enough to replace the social aspect is within the realm of believability, but I just can't see myself getting physical with an AI. I'd rather hire escorts and engage in sex tourism overseas to fulfill that need.
Yeah, an inanimate robot can't but what if the robot could move like a woman. We're still a ways away yet and not in your lifetime but that's the long-term plan I would say.
It only works as a product if the robot can't leave you, which means there isn't a person there to contend with. People would abuse them until they see the cracks in the behavior and lose interest. They would get bored with the realistic toy after a while. It wouldn't be fulfilling.
Then program it however you want. That will be the beauty in it. You can do whatever you want with it and get it to do whatever you want for you. It's basically what men tried to get women to be like under a hard patriarchy but couldn't work out the kinks. Futuristic robots will allow us to work out the problems that biological women had so we won't need biological women.
The only bargaining chip that will work is them needing protection after the clown show crashes and burns, which is why we need to let that happen instead of trying to work around the rot, which is all this does. That's what I mean by solve the feminism problem. Women would rather torch the whole thing than give up their privileges, so we need to call their bluff and let it collapse so we can build something functional in its place.
If we have to give them protection when it all burns, we lost.
Let me explain.
Imagine you're a race car driver and the person at the back of the grid cuts all the way to the front, openly cheating for the whole race. Taking people out, cutting corners, tampering with the other competitors' cars etc etc.
When they get caught, their punishment is just to return to the back of the pack and nothing else.
That wouldn't be fair in sport and it isn't fair here. We need to allow their failure to put them in an objectively worse position than when they started.
Their need for protection is a bargaining chip. We can certainly use it to put them in a worse off position, although I'd be more concerned about improving the lot of men and boys and preventing women from pulling this crap again. But then again collective punishment is the bread and butter of feminism, so I wouldn't be against applying it to a privileged caste for a change.
Very stupid and pointless. All they did was cut the Y out of one set of XY and stick a duplicate X in there. This goes into "just because we could, doesn't mean we should".
The Guardian reported the new research will be used to treat infertility and also one day possibly allow same-sex couples to have a biological child together.
No, it will not. This has nothing whatsoever to do with "infertility".
This is cloning and it is banned for humans.
600 fertilized eggs only resulted in 7 births. The issue is that slicing and dicing DNA damages it, and this causes things to break. Just because a mouse survived to be born doesn't mean it doesn't have fucked up DNA.
Being able to slice and dice for cloning purposes is not new and has been done for decades. Nothing about this research is new, it's just a "lol lets try to make a 'two dads' mouse for fun using already existing tech"
Women to become obsolete
It's good news for at least one of us I'm pretty sure lol
This would potentially allow gay couples to have genetic children. You still need a womb.
Fags just use surrogates ATM.
Women to become a minority whose only employment prospects are repeated pregnancies.
Judge Doom did nothing wrong.
Like just about anything out of hollywood, the plot of Who Framed Roger Rabbit is anti-capitalist. The movie of course has Doom as a serial killer who wants to genocide his own people for profit, but to hear him explain his actions in his own words, he is going to replace a broken, bankrupt transportation system with a massive road building project that will bring business, opportunity and prosperity to the city.
Standing in his way is Toon Town, a neighbourhood he'd need to bulldoze for his project. What is in this neighbourhood? Brainless miscreants, problem whackjobs. Even Eddie Valiant, the toons' principle advocate, fucking hates Toon Town and can't stand being in it - because in just a few minutes there, you'll be assaulted, sexually harassed, people will try to kill you, and they'll think it's funny. ...Sounds a lot like your average white liberal and their relationship with black neighborhoods, doesn't it? No accident. The toons are black people - minstrels who perform on TV and stage for white liberal amusement.
Judge Doom's principal crime is not murder - that's just the justification for painting him as 'the bad guy'. His crime is that he is a capitalist, and believes in order over chaos.
If we're going this route why not create eugenically perfected 300IQ supermen already?
Antisemitism
????
because the scientists are actually really shitty at this and aren't capable of making true designer babies. the birth success rate in this article was only 7 out of 600 attempts, and I'd bet you most of those who survived to birth had fucked up DNA which will cause them to die early deaths.
the best science can do is take a bunch of your sperm and your wife's eggs and just throw them together, then take the embryos and test them to see how they turned out, and give you a printout multiple choice of which kid you want to implant. So you can basically reroll your kid a limited number of times and pick the best one. But this is very expensive and so only a plaything for the rich, and its not like you can know how smart the kid will be or most other traits.
What I am suggesting is of course farfetched and with the caveat of complete finnancial and moral abandonment until these ends were achieved.
I feel as though if we're going to play God, we might aswell go for the gusto and do extremely inhumane things in the name of getting to that point rather than stopping at giving Bill and Steve a kid to ruin.
I 100% believe that the Ubermensch is coming the moment he is possible and I 100% support it. It doesn't matter who tries to stop it. All it takes is China or North Korea doing it first, then the whole world would have to follow or else be utterly subjugated.
It just isn't possible and will not be possible unless and until scientists can develop a process to edit human DNA that is extremely precise and error-free. We are nowhere near that yet, and given the extremely small atomic scales of this editing, it is probably a long way off. Doing this kind of editing is much, much easier with shit like viruses (even the Chinese in Wuhan could do it!) because viruses are very simple and it doesn't matter if your method only works 1/1000 times.
We also need a much better understanding of the genetic basis of human intelligence. It isn't like hair or eye color, it is an extremely complex interconnection of numerous factors. We will need to have accurate intelligence testing better than what we have now (possibly AI driven) and then feed those test results + DNA of the test taker into a giant AI database, and have an AI build a model of human intelligence based on that. Then we can keep making "maximum brainpower" men and feeding their results back into the AI until we reach the limits of human capacity. Of course other shit like height & physical attractiveness are child's play by comparison so those will be solved much sooner.
Well this'll get shut down FAST. Having women be able to procreate without men works in the current leftist systems thanks to bigger bias to be part of a group.
If men can procreate without women, you've just removed the BIGGEST card feminism has to play. Forget 'this'll be used to encourage gays', men without any need to entertain women's desires destroys all leftist claims to power.
Locking women out of the process is all fun and games until men who want kids are expected to date troons since biological children no longer require a real woman. Solving the feminism problem is a much better way to go.
I think the end goal is likely to end the family unit entirely. Communal raising facilities where men who are trained in the raising of boys can raise your kids while you go to work. Then biological women will be entirely eradicated from the species to be replaced by fully robotic women who men can use as sex slaves without any qualms about "morals".
Maybe I'm just old fashioned, but I'm skeptical that a robot could replace a woman from a physical intimacy perspective. A conversational AI getting good enough to replace the social aspect is within the realm of believability, but I just can't see myself getting physical with an AI. I'd rather hire escorts and engage in sex tourism overseas to fulfill that need.
Yeah, an inanimate robot can't but what if the robot could move like a woman. We're still a ways away yet and not in your lifetime but that's the long-term plan I would say.
It only works as a product if the robot can't leave you, which means there isn't a person there to contend with. People would abuse them until they see the cracks in the behavior and lose interest. They would get bored with the realistic toy after a while. It wouldn't be fulfilling.
I disagree. I think men would find more fulfilment in it than real women.
You are mistaken. I, for one, would rather have a star-wars-like robot that cleans and cooks. No need for emotional masturbation.
Then program it however you want. That will be the beauty in it. You can do whatever you want with it and get it to do whatever you want for you. It's basically what men tried to get women to be like under a hard patriarchy but couldn't work out the kinks. Futuristic robots will allow us to work out the problems that biological women had so we won't need biological women.
You're wrong, the mean wouldn't have to date trannies because trannies only exists because feminists made them, no women = no feminism = no trannies.
Did I do it right Imp? Man I can't wait for him to come to this thread.
Yes, but it requires a heavy bargaining chip.
The only bargaining chip that will work is them needing protection after the clown show crashes and burns, which is why we need to let that happen instead of trying to work around the rot, which is all this does. That's what I mean by solve the feminism problem. Women would rather torch the whole thing than give up their privileges, so we need to call their bluff and let it collapse so we can build something functional in its place.
If we have to give them protection when it all burns, we lost.
Let me explain.
Imagine you're a race car driver and the person at the back of the grid cuts all the way to the front, openly cheating for the whole race. Taking people out, cutting corners, tampering with the other competitors' cars etc etc.
When they get caught, their punishment is just to return to the back of the pack and nothing else.
That wouldn't be fair in sport and it isn't fair here. We need to allow their failure to put them in an objectively worse position than when they started.
Their need for protection is a bargaining chip. We can certainly use it to put them in a worse off position, although I'd be more concerned about improving the lot of men and boys and preventing women from pulling this crap again. But then again collective punishment is the bread and butter of feminism, so I wouldn't be against applying it to a privileged caste for a change.
I never found a way to properly explain my beliefs before that analogy. It's perfect.
I think that we have to make sure they lose out heavily if we want to avoid treading this path again in future generations.
State enforced homosexuality.
robosexuality
Can't wait to see the horrific impacts on these "children"
THE AGE OF WOMEN IS OVER
Very stupid and pointless. All they did was cut the Y out of one set of XY and stick a duplicate X in there. This goes into "just because we could, doesn't mean we should".
No, it will not. This has nothing whatsoever to do with "infertility".
This is cloning and it is banned for humans.
600 fertilized eggs only resulted in 7 births. The issue is that slicing and dicing DNA damages it, and this causes things to break. Just because a mouse survived to be born doesn't mean it doesn't have fucked up DNA.
Being able to slice and dice for cloning purposes is not new and has been done for decades. Nothing about this research is new, it's just a "lol lets try to make a 'two dads' mouse for fun using already existing tech"
All the speculation is fun, but this is just for 'because we could'. There is no real application of this.
The worst half of society on suicide watch.