Locking women out of the process is all fun and games until men who want kids are expected to date troons since biological children no longer require a real woman. Solving the feminism problem is a much better way to go.
I think the end goal is likely to end the family unit entirely. Communal raising facilities where men who are trained in the raising of boys can raise your kids while you go to work. Then biological women will be entirely eradicated from the species to be replaced by fully robotic women who men can use as sex slaves without any qualms about "morals".
Maybe I'm just old fashioned, but I'm skeptical that a robot could replace a woman from a physical intimacy perspective. A conversational AI getting good enough to replace the social aspect is within the realm of believability, but I just can't see myself getting physical with an AI. I'd rather hire escorts and engage in sex tourism overseas to fulfill that need.
Yeah, an inanimate robot can't but what if the robot could move like a woman. We're still a ways away yet and not in your lifetime but that's the long-term plan I would say.
It only works as a product if the robot can't leave you, which means there isn't a person there to contend with. People would abuse them until they see the cracks in the behavior and lose interest. They would get bored with the realistic toy after a while. It wouldn't be fulfilling.
The only bargaining chip that will work is them needing protection after the clown show crashes and burns, which is why we need to let that happen instead of trying to work around the rot, which is all this does. That's what I mean by solve the feminism problem. Women would rather torch the whole thing than give up their privileges, so we need to call their bluff and let it collapse so we can build something functional in its place.
Their need for protection is a bargaining chip. We can certainly use it to put them in a worse off position, although I'd be more concerned about improving the lot of men and boys and preventing women from pulling this crap again. But then again collective punishment is the bread and butter of feminism, so I wouldn't be against applying it to a privileged caste for a change.
Locking women out of the process is all fun and games until men who want kids are expected to date troons since biological children no longer require a real woman. Solving the feminism problem is a much better way to go.
I think the end goal is likely to end the family unit entirely. Communal raising facilities where men who are trained in the raising of boys can raise your kids while you go to work. Then biological women will be entirely eradicated from the species to be replaced by fully robotic women who men can use as sex slaves without any qualms about "morals".
Maybe I'm just old fashioned, but I'm skeptical that a robot could replace a woman from a physical intimacy perspective. A conversational AI getting good enough to replace the social aspect is within the realm of believability, but I just can't see myself getting physical with an AI. I'd rather hire escorts and engage in sex tourism overseas to fulfill that need.
Yeah, an inanimate robot can't but what if the robot could move like a woman. We're still a ways away yet and not in your lifetime but that's the long-term plan I would say.
It only works as a product if the robot can't leave you, which means there isn't a person there to contend with. People would abuse them until they see the cracks in the behavior and lose interest. They would get bored with the realistic toy after a while. It wouldn't be fulfilling.
You're wrong, the mean wouldn't have to date trannies because trannies only exists because feminists made them, no women = no feminism = no trannies.
Did I do it right Imp? Man I can't wait for him to come to this thread.
Yes, but it requires a heavy bargaining chip.
The only bargaining chip that will work is them needing protection after the clown show crashes and burns, which is why we need to let that happen instead of trying to work around the rot, which is all this does. That's what I mean by solve the feminism problem. Women would rather torch the whole thing than give up their privileges, so we need to call their bluff and let it collapse so we can build something functional in its place.
Their need for protection is a bargaining chip. We can certainly use it to put them in a worse off position, although I'd be more concerned about improving the lot of men and boys and preventing women from pulling this crap again. But then again collective punishment is the bread and butter of feminism, so I wouldn't be against applying it to a privileged caste for a change.