This is just mental retardation at this point. Your “gotcha” is that the best selling single player game of the year, headed towards billions in raw profit, and almost certain to spawn multiple sequels, is now, after weeks on top, falling behind F2P multiplayer shooters in “active players”. Surely, this vindicates your comically retarded commentary on this game.
If Hogwarts Legacy was not a smashing success, what does that make every other single player game released in the last few years?
Seriously, Imp, it is blessing to have you as my opponent on so many issues. The “stormfags” couldn’t ask for a better enemy.
None of what you listed is a problem for someone with even basic critical thinking skills. And if you factor in sales, bundles, emulation, and other ways of 🏴☠️acquiring games online🏴☠️ then you end up saving more money over consoles in the long-run.
My Graphics card will be good for the next few years, and I can upgrade it any time for much less than the cost of a PS5, not to mention I can easily get a few hundred for my old one. The only real problem with PC gaming lately has been terrible optimization of PC ports.
Starfield has a LOT of row to hoe. BethSoft's last published offering was Fallout 76 dude. It has been a while but not long enough for the market to forget that one. It's the major reason why the PR campaign for Starfield has been so muted.
If it isn't cracked out of the gate the reviewers are going to kick it around.
Until Starfield blows it out of the water and sends JK Rowling back to writing shitty books
Yeah, we still don't really know what Starfield is or will be. And Beth has burned a lot of goodwill with Fallout 76.
Besides, looking at player figures, how many people bought it for political reasons?
I'm willing to bet that it's a miniscule amount. Most people dont't hate things enough to spend money on things they don't like just to spite people that won't notice anyway.
Twelve million sales, but nobody's playing. Sounds like someone's cooking the books
Tell me you have no idea about player-stats without telling me you have no idea about player-stats. I mean, you obviously haven't payed attention to these kind of things before and everyone that has can clearly see it. Sorry to tell you, but these kind of numbers are in line with what to expect of this kind of game.
The fact that "dead" Fortnite
I start to see a pattern here. You don't play fortnight anymore, so it's dead. You didn't buy HL, so nobody did.
Maybe the PC Master Race were cucked enough to buy it, while console players actually looked at the merit of the title rather than "oh, buy it to own the trannies
You bought Atomic heart to own Ukraine, so everyone that bought HL, bought it to own the trannies
Also, if they make a sequel, it will sell horribly
It is a single player game so most people beat it and stopped playing. If your really worried about the billionaire TERF’s money, might need to worry more about the game sequels they announced. WB is going to milk the hell out of this (they are also making a TV show but we know that’ll fail fast.)
Mate, I would stop and take a breather. I get it, you have reasons not to like J K Rowling but maybe better to move onto more pressing issues.
Given the current state of the world, you could easily find a female pedo teacher or a wife that wants to maim her child to spite her ex to mention than focus on this game since one of the reasons it became so successful was because the left labelled it a transphobia genocide simulator...
While I think you are a bit too extreme, Atomic Heart having a thot collecting money...yeah, fuck her with a rusty spiky pike. She'd never see a dime of my money. Good luck getting yours back.
As usual, Imp is indistinguishable from the average rabid troon activist.
I assume that's the purple white green flag you keep obsessing over. You think it does anyone actual harm if you burn a flag?
This is just mental retardation at this point. Your “gotcha” is that the best selling single player game of the year, headed towards billions in raw profit, and almost certain to spawn multiple sequels, is now, after weeks on top, falling behind F2P multiplayer shooters in “active players”. Surely, this vindicates your comically retarded commentary on this game.
If Hogwarts Legacy was not a smashing success, what does that make every other single player game released in the last few years?
Seriously, Imp, it is blessing to have you as my opponent on so many issues. The “stormfags” couldn’t ask for a better enemy.
Even then, if you look at how many people are playing on Steam, it is still around 141k. Which isnt exactly a tiny amount.
Imagine not having both a gaming PC and the console(s) of your choice. I'll bet you even think you're a "gamer".
None of what you listed is a problem for someone with even basic critical thinking skills. And if you factor in sales, bundles, emulation, and other ways of 🏴☠️acquiring games online🏴☠️ then you end up saving more money over consoles in the long-run.
My Graphics card will be good for the next few years, and I can upgrade it any time for much less than the cost of a PS5, not to mention I can easily get a few hundred for my old one. The only real problem with PC gaming lately has been terrible optimization of PC ports.
Starfield has a LOT of row to hoe. BethSoft's last published offering was Fallout 76 dude. It has been a while but not long enough for the market to forget that one. It's the major reason why the PR campaign for Starfield has been so muted.
If it isn't cracked out of the gate the reviewers are going to kick it around.
Yeah, we still don't really know what Starfield is or will be. And Beth has burned a lot of goodwill with Fallout 76.
I'm willing to bet that it's a miniscule amount. Most people dont't hate things enough to spend money on things they don't like just to spite people that won't notice anyway.
Tell me you have no idea about player-stats without telling me you have no idea about player-stats. I mean, you obviously haven't payed attention to these kind of things before and everyone that has can clearly see it. Sorry to tell you, but these kind of numbers are in line with what to expect of this kind of game.
I start to see a pattern here. You don't play fortnight anymore, so it's dead. You didn't buy HL, so nobody did.
You bought Atomic heart to own Ukraine, so everyone that bought HL, bought it to own the trannies
You won't buy it, so nobody will.
You don't want to marry, so nobody wants to
You don't want children, so nobody wants them
The projection is strong with you.
What percentage of this is bots? https://activeplayer.io/fortnite/
Not like it matters since HL is bots too, right?
It is a single player game so most people beat it and stopped playing. If your really worried about the billionaire TERF’s money, might need to worry more about the game sequels they announced. WB is going to milk the hell out of this (they are also making a TV show but we know that’ll fail fast.)
Mate, I would stop and take a breather. I get it, you have reasons not to like J K Rowling but maybe better to move onto more pressing issues.
Given the current state of the world, you could easily find a female pedo teacher or a wife that wants to maim her child to spite her ex to mention than focus on this game since one of the reasons it became so successful was because the left labelled it a transphobia genocide simulator...
While I think you are a bit too extreme, Atomic Heart having a thot collecting money...yeah, fuck her with a rusty spiky pike. She'd never see a dime of my money. Good luck getting yours back.
Imp you really don’t have to tilt at every single windmill you see.
It does seem a little more relevant, yes.
You've got to be trolling us mate.
Lmfao
Seriously -- are you trying to be funny? Like, playing up your insanity and we're all supposed to be in on the joke or something?
Is it really beating them if it’s free to play?