Imp, on this we agree: It is inherently sexist to force men, and only men, to fight and die for their country. I'm okay with this only if men are afforded special privileges and respect commensurate with such a sacrifice -- albeit an involuntary sacrifice -- but such is not the case.
I live in Canada. If I were conscripted, I'd desert.
I’m not dying on a ship or some godless jungle island in the pacific for all the people who spent two years trying to force vaccinate me, censoring my every word and declaring me a second class citizen.
I also live in Canada and if I get pressed into service the way I’ve seen videos of in Ukraine, basically abducted at gunpoint, I will kill my commanding officer AS SOON AS I’m given a weapon. Fuck this goddamn faggot country.
You're not an individual first and foremost? Are you a cell in a macroorganism or a mindless, obedient ant in a colony? A cog in someone else's factory? What are you if not an individual?
I assume ThatsAlright always plays as Chairman Yang in Alpha Centauri.
The goals of the group and the greater race are transcendent, and to embrace them is to achieve enlightenment... It is every citizen's final duty to go into the tanks, and become one with all the people.
Individualization, specifically, occurs through people and groups of which one is a part of; they are made made, not born.
Are you saying an individual is simply the absence of group connections or affiliations and that that's unnatural or wrong or even not possible? Is it because no person can spring up out of the ether and people are always the products of the coupling of others?
If so, and I mean no disrespect, but that seems like an arbitrary perspective. Why draw the line at humans? We don't exist without 3.9 billion years of evolution, so why is "the basis of humanity... family" -- assuming human family -- and not all life? We need to eat other non-human living things to exist, after all. Why isn't the basis of humanity all non-living matter, since we're all just made up of inert fragments of different compounds?
The idea that humans are, by default, a collective, that being an individual is "wrong," but that no other branches of life (or non-life) are also part of that collective seems completely arbitrary to me. You can't have existed without other people, but... you can't exist without hydrogen either.
The other issue I have is your non-individual perspective presupposes entitlement to or from others. By not being an individual foremost, you're suggesting a moral requirement that others support you and/or you support them in some way. What fundamental physical law of nature says I owe anyone anything? If that doesn't exist, then your position is a moral one.
Because I'm talking about humans, that should be obvious.
Individualism/collectivism is just a shitlib distinction, that's kinda the point here. People are, as I've noted, relational individuals.
Alright, so individuality is problematic but people are simultaneously individuals and groups, and you're only talking about humans because you're only talking about humans. Gotcha, mate.
Ok so they are willing let the physically disabled and mentally disabled have access to military hardware
Guess that means their military is more inclusive to trans now!
But seriously, if this is true, the War is going EVEN worse than I thought for them, this is only one step away from when Germany in the end WW2 made kids man anti air batteries.
As soon as America and the west prods them into trying to take Crimea.
People joke about the Russian "red lines" but as soon as the bridge bombing happened the Russians knocked out like 50-70% of the Ukies infrastructure. This war has become existential for Russia and once we push over something we shouldn't we'll be officially at war with the Russians and if we're not radioactive vapour the draft is not far behind.
Alright, I'm not surprised that the resident psychotic tranny ate this all up, but how does everyone else in the comments fall for this obvious bullshit too? Jesus Christ people, THINK. Who would clothe and arm them? Where would they stay? Who would keep the country, you know, running?
This isn't even the first time Imp posted the same garbage either, I remember a similar post from her at least half a year ago.
In war you get war assignments. People necessary to keep the country running are assigned to positions which are necessary to keep the country running.
Imp, on this we agree: It is inherently sexist to force men, and only men, to fight and die for their country. I'm okay with this only if men are afforded special privileges and respect commensurate with such a sacrifice -- albeit an involuntary sacrifice -- but such is not the case.
I live in Canada. If I were conscripted, I'd desert.
I’m in New Zealand - likewise.
I’m not dying on a ship or some godless jungle island in the pacific for all the people who spent two years trying to force vaccinate me, censoring my every word and declaring me a second class citizen.
Get fucked 🖕
Imagine dying on the beaches of Normandy for the UK to turn into a fascist shithole in less than a generation.
https://youtu.be/uZ2q1m9lxlY
I also live in Canada and if I get pressed into service the way I’ve seen videos of in Ukraine, basically abducted at gunpoint, I will kill my commanding officer AS SOON AS I’m given a weapon. Fuck this goddamn faggot country.
The best solution would be to dodge the draft to force the government to send regressive leftists to die in Ukraine.
You're not an individual first and foremost? Are you a cell in a macroorganism or a mindless, obedient ant in a colony? A cog in someone else's factory? What are you if not an individual?
I assume ThatsAlright always plays as Chairman Yang in Alpha Centauri.
Are you saying an individual is simply the absence of group connections or affiliations and that that's unnatural or wrong or even not possible? Is it because no person can spring up out of the ether and people are always the products of the coupling of others?
If so, and I mean no disrespect, but that seems like an arbitrary perspective. Why draw the line at humans? We don't exist without 3.9 billion years of evolution, so why is "the basis of humanity... family" -- assuming human family -- and not all life? We need to eat other non-human living things to exist, after all. Why isn't the basis of humanity all non-living matter, since we're all just made up of inert fragments of different compounds?
The idea that humans are, by default, a collective, that being an individual is "wrong," but that no other branches of life (or non-life) are also part of that collective seems completely arbitrary to me. You can't have existed without other people, but... you can't exist without hydrogen either.
The other issue I have is your non-individual perspective presupposes entitlement to or from others. By not being an individual foremost, you're suggesting a moral requirement that others support you and/or you support them in some way. What fundamental physical law of nature says I owe anyone anything? If that doesn't exist, then your position is a moral one.
Alright, so individuality is problematic but people are simultaneously individuals and groups, and you're only talking about humans because you're only talking about humans. Gotcha, mate.
Except the sons of politicians and oligarchs of course.
Looks like we've now entered the Volkssturm phase of the war.
But I thought Ukraine was winning and was going to be marching into Moscow any day now?
Ok so they are willing let the physically disabled and mentally disabled have access to military hardware
Guess that means their military is more inclusive to trans now!
But seriously, if this is true, the War is going EVEN worse than I thought for them, this is only one step away from when Germany in the end WW2 made kids man anti air batteries.
How soon until they reinstate the draft in America to send men to Ukraine?
They should draft everyone flying the Ukraine flag or using the flag emoji in their profile.
Aman.
As soon as America and the west prods them into trying to take Crimea.
People joke about the Russian "red lines" but as soon as the bridge bombing happened the Russians knocked out like 50-70% of the Ukies infrastructure. This war has become existential for Russia and once we push over something we shouldn't we'll be officially at war with the Russians and if we're not radioactive vapour the draft is not far behind.
Nothing says "Winning the war" like drafting men 20-55.
Alright, I'm not surprised that the resident psychotic tranny ate this all up, but how does everyone else in the comments fall for this obvious bullshit too? Jesus Christ people, THINK. Who would clothe and arm them? Where would they stay? Who would keep the country, you know, running?
This isn't even the first time Imp posted the same garbage either, I remember a similar post from her at least half a year ago.
In war you get war assignments. People necessary to keep the country running are assigned to positions which are necessary to keep the country running.
That's called a job you retarded fucking troglodyte.
Russia watch out
Kill off all the men.. then not enough men around. So they will import rapefugees.
But they already exported their Afrokrainians to the West.
https://www.donegallive.ie/news/local-news/767381/breaking-ukrainian-refugees-arrive-in-bundoran.html
Hope Microsoft extracted the STALKER team before this shit shit hit.
Would you mind sharing this in r/Mensrights as well ?
Oh okay then. Better to wait for it to be confirmed
Ukraine’s first lady: Women bearing the brunt of the war.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/01/15/ukraine-zelenska-women-families-war-00077990
The source of this tweet thinks the Christian Right are totalitarian fascists trying to take over America. Not exactly a credible source.
Why just men? I keep seeing over twitter how fearsome and elite the females are as well.
Equal rights, equal fights.
Would you kindly now shoot Zelensky?