I read that gays are the lowest, lesbians are the highest, and straights fall somewhere in the middle. In other words domestic violence rates are correlated with the number of women in the relationship. That would probably hold for polytard relationships, although the data would be tough to collect considering the different forms those can take.
One of the only actual major advances we've had in medicine in the last couple decades is to make it so gay guys can keep fucking each other nonstop. Kind of chilling, isn't it?
Pasting a comment I saw here a long time ago, I think it was from GeneralBoobs:
It's a dark day for sluts. A judge ruled that employers don't have to cover PrEP, the HIV antiviral drug believed to prevent HIV infection, with a laundry list of nasty side effects. Taking this, faggots thought themselves invulnerable, and have spread other STDs, making several incurable.
One of my favorite side effects for people taking this poison pill is osteoporosis. It made their bones brittle and their teeth fall out. They end up looking like they're on meth and have AIDS anyways.
Fauci had a hand in it. You know, the great satan of the HIV days.
Then there's this bit of info from the CDC's website: assigned female at birth. This shit is poison and so is PrEP. Goes hand in hand, or dick in ass as the case may be.
"Fat redistribution and accumulation (lipodystrophy) has been observed in people receiving antiretroviral therapy, including fat reductions in the face, limbs, and buttocks and increases in visceral fat of the abdomen and accumulations in the upper back"
AIDS face! You will know them by their gaunt faces, hunchedbacks, and pot bellies!
I remember that other people's kids could not go to school because of monkeypox (I wonder why), but that the orgies could not stop. Also that the mention of monkeypox disappeared from one day to the next.
There's a reason gay men have the most sex, and gay women the least.
Just on average, general principles. Take how horny your average bloke is. How much sex would he be having if the women he approached were as keen to fuck as he was?
Now let's create a culture of debauchery, embracing of sins (pride and lust being the key two here), and remove the potential child-bearing consequences cause thats not how babies are made.
Here here. I would even go as far as to say that any intercourse that is not with the intent of creating a child is merely in advanced form of masturbation.
Often when I would argue that homosexuality is a disorder, a common retort from Leftists is that homosexuality appears in nature so therefore it must be natural. They then cite cases of male dogs, male geese and other male animals humping members of their own sex. I explained to them that male animals will hump anything in sight, living or otherwise, and that humping things indiscriminately -- occasionally including a creature of the same sex -- doesn't make them homosexual, just very horny.
As far as I'm aware there is no manifestation of homosexuality -- as it's represented by the Left - in nature. There are no gay relationships, no gay pair bonding, no gay mating practices. The only examples they have are horny male animals masturbating by indiscriminately humping other male animals.
All signs point to homosexuality being little more than a sexual fetish or a disorder that has been "dressed up" by the Left to mimic heterosexual relationships in the name of broader societal acceptance. There's not even any evidence that homosexuals were "born that way" as we are so often told and people now just accept. In contrast, there's plenty of evidence that homosexuality is the result of conditioning, in many cases sexual abuse and trauma.
The normalization and acceptance of homosexuality was the destruction of the final rampart that held back the flood waters of degeneracy. There are no limits to how fare they're willing to go at this point.
Fair. I can absolutely believe that this is an expansion of the meaning of the word 'sex' from the 60s, from the likes of Money et al. You were right to call me out on it, for accepting that definition.
San Francisco does have the Castro, a Mecca for the rainbow brigade. everything on that street is overtly sexual, from penis shaped popsicles to novelty stores displaying dildos in the front window. after seeing that street, this statistic does not surprise me in the least.
How can someone not be tuckered out and have their libido satiated just after 10 or so partners in a month? What kind of crazy food or medicine they ingest to have an ungodly drive like that?
Honestly, these conversations are about as fruitful as the Dust Bowl and I feel like my time would be better spent on something more productive than this... like huffing glue or learning French.
If you wanna scream about people being cause because, I dunno, daddy didn't hug them enough, then be my fucking guest. Just don't expect to change very minds by telling people they're evil and claiming shit they doesn't apply to them.
Hell, even hetero black women make up almost double the rates of White and Latino women.
But who do you think they're getting it from? A lot of those 'heterosexual' black men... aren't.
Honestly, these conversations are about as fruitful as the Dust Bowl and I feel like my time would be better spent on something more productive than this... like huffing glue or learning French.
The problem is that these activists will not leave people alone. If these statistics are not brought up, then they will be forgotten, and people will forget that it might not be the best idea to wear armbands to glorify a lifestyle with such detrimental effects. Or to push this on kids, as they do.
I had to double-check to make sure I wasn't the original author because I've posted content very similar to this on reddit in the early 2010's.
As expected, 90% of the comments are hand-waving away his points or attacking his character. I only see one that that honestly tries to address his evidence, and they do poorly. This is typical for reddit and internet debates in general. Good faith argumentation is rare and hard to find. The vast majority of internet discourse is biased bandwagoning.
Projection is a fundamental mechanism of Progressive mental derangement.
Which explains why Pedditors accuse right wingers of being the real pedos while they use r/AHS as a kiddy porn exchange.
Lol. No big deal according to the fags.
I read that gays are the lowest, lesbians are the highest, and straights fall somewhere in the middle. In other words domestic violence rates are correlated with the number of women in the relationship. That would probably hold for polytard relationships, although the data would be tough to collect considering the different forms those can take.
I guess with a body count in the 4 digits the violence is so thin that is pales in comparison.
Holy fuck. I knew it was skewed, but I had no clue the numbers were anything like that. If true... 0_o
You didn’t realize that when gay dudes couldn’t stop having orgies for a whole week to stop the spread of monkeypox?
I only just discovered that gay men take PREP so they can have sex with HIV infected men without condoms.
One of the only actual major advances we've had in medicine in the last couple decades is to make it so gay guys can keep fucking each other nonstop. Kind of chilling, isn't it?
Pasting a comment I saw here a long time ago, I think it was from GeneralBoobs:
I remember that other people's kids could not go to school because of monkeypox (I wonder why), but that the orgies could not stop. Also that the mention of monkeypox disappeared from one day to the next.
It vanished from the media once kids and dogs started getting it
There's a reason gay men have the most sex, and gay women the least.
Just on average, general principles. Take how horny your average bloke is. How much sex would he be having if the women he approached were as keen to fuck as he was?
Now let's create a culture of debauchery, embracing of sins (pride and lust being the key two here), and remove the potential child-bearing consequences cause thats not how babies are made.
Yeah, they're having a lot of sex.
Don't accept the premise that sodomy is sex.
Here here. I would even go as far as to say that any intercourse that is not with the intent of creating a child is merely in advanced form of masturbation.
Often when I would argue that homosexuality is a disorder, a common retort from Leftists is that homosexuality appears in nature so therefore it must be natural. They then cite cases of male dogs, male geese and other male animals humping members of their own sex. I explained to them that male animals will hump anything in sight, living or otherwise, and that humping things indiscriminately -- occasionally including a creature of the same sex -- doesn't make them homosexual, just very horny.
As far as I'm aware there is no manifestation of homosexuality -- as it's represented by the Left - in nature. There are no gay relationships, no gay pair bonding, no gay mating practices. The only examples they have are horny male animals masturbating by indiscriminately humping other male animals.
All signs point to homosexuality being little more than a sexual fetish or a disorder that has been "dressed up" by the Left to mimic heterosexual relationships in the name of broader societal acceptance. There's not even any evidence that homosexuals were "born that way" as we are so often told and people now just accept. In contrast, there's plenty of evidence that homosexuality is the result of conditioning, in many cases sexual abuse and trauma.
The normalization and acceptance of homosexuality was the destruction of the final rampart that held back the flood waters of degeneracy. There are no limits to how fare they're willing to go at this point.
Fair. I can absolutely believe that this is an expansion of the meaning of the word 'sex' from the 60s, from the likes of Money et al. You were right to call me out on it, for accepting that definition.
Its tough when we've been indoctrinated since birth by subverted media.
I feel like I have to analyze my word choices so I don't give the gay commies support inadvertently.
Studies say people will believe anything if you preface it with "studies say".
San Francisco does have the Castro, a Mecca for the rainbow brigade. everything on that street is overtly sexual, from penis shaped popsicles to novelty stores displaying dildos in the front window. after seeing that street, this statistic does not surprise me in the least.
Sounds impossible to me.
How can someone not be tuckered out and have their libido satiated just after 10 or so partners in a month? What kind of crazy food or medicine they ingest to have an ungodly drive like that?
Meth is rather popular.
This is an understatement.
There are people who are so hijacked by their sex reward pathway that they only exist for the purpose of seeking it.
Break it down by race and you get a completely different picture. One that shows black people making up a disproportionate amount of cases. Hell, even hetero black women make up almost double the rates of White and Latino women.
Honestly, these conversations are about as fruitful as the Dust Bowl and I feel like my time would be better spent on something more productive than this... like huffing glue or learning French.
If you wanna scream about people being cause because, I dunno, daddy didn't hug them enough, then be my fucking guest. Just don't expect to change very minds by telling people they're evil and claiming shit they doesn't apply to them.
But who do you think they're getting it from? A lot of those 'heterosexual' black men... aren't.
The problem is that these activists will not leave people alone. If these statistics are not brought up, then they will be forgotten, and people will forget that it might not be the best idea to wear armbands to glorify a lifestyle with such detrimental effects. Or to push this on kids, as they do.
And I say that as someone who is bisexual...
Counterrevolutionary!
Buttfuckers Uber Alles!
I had to double-check to make sure I wasn't the original author because I've posted content very similar to this on reddit in the early 2010's.
As expected, 90% of the comments are hand-waving away his points or attacking his character. I only see one that that honestly tries to address his evidence, and they do poorly. This is typical for reddit and internet debates in general. Good faith argumentation is rare and hard to find. The vast majority of internet discourse is biased bandwagoning.
So what?
So maybe stop doing that shit to not suffer from those things?
Because it was posted 3 years ago.