There's a reason gay men have the most sex, and gay women the least.
Just on average, general principles. Take how horny your average bloke is. How much sex would he be having if the women he approached were as keen to fuck as he was?
Now let's create a culture of debauchery, embracing of sins (pride and lust being the key two here), and remove the potential child-bearing consequences cause thats not how babies are made.
Here here. I would even go as far as to say that any intercourse that is not with the intent of creating a child is merely in advanced form of masturbation.
Often when I would argue that homosexuality is a disorder, a common retort from Leftists is that homosexuality appears in nature so therefore it must be natural. They then cite cases of male dogs, male geese and other male animals humping members of their own sex. I explained to them that male animals will hump anything in sight, living or otherwise, and that humping things indiscriminately -- occasionally including a creature of the same sex -- doesn't make them homosexual, just very horny.
As far as I'm aware there is no manifestation of homosexuality -- as it's represented by the Left - in nature. There are no gay relationships, no gay pair bonding, no gay mating practices. The only examples they have are horny male animals masturbating by indiscriminately humping other male animals.
All signs point to homosexuality being little more than a sexual fetish or a disorder that has been "dressed up" by the Left to mimic heterosexual relationships in the name of broader societal acceptance. There's not even any evidence that homosexuals were "born that way" as we are so often told and people now just accept. In contrast, there's plenty of evidence that homosexuality is the result of conditioning, in many cases sexual abuse and trauma.
The normalization and acceptance of homosexuality was the destruction of the final rampart that held back the flood waters of degeneracy. There are no limits to how fare they're willing to go at this point.
Fair. I can absolutely believe that this is an expansion of the meaning of the word 'sex' from the 60s, from the likes of Money et al. You were right to call me out on it, for accepting that definition.
There's a reason gay men have the most sex, and gay women the least.
Just on average, general principles. Take how horny your average bloke is. How much sex would he be having if the women he approached were as keen to fuck as he was?
Now let's create a culture of debauchery, embracing of sins (pride and lust being the key two here), and remove the potential child-bearing consequences cause thats not how babies are made.
Yeah, they're having a lot of sex.
Don't accept the premise that sodomy is sex.
Here here. I would even go as far as to say that any intercourse that is not with the intent of creating a child is merely in advanced form of masturbation.
Often when I would argue that homosexuality is a disorder, a common retort from Leftists is that homosexuality appears in nature so therefore it must be natural. They then cite cases of male dogs, male geese and other male animals humping members of their own sex. I explained to them that male animals will hump anything in sight, living or otherwise, and that humping things indiscriminately -- occasionally including a creature of the same sex -- doesn't make them homosexual, just very horny.
As far as I'm aware there is no manifestation of homosexuality -- as it's represented by the Left - in nature. There are no gay relationships, no gay pair bonding, no gay mating practices. The only examples they have are horny male animals masturbating by indiscriminately humping other male animals.
All signs point to homosexuality being little more than a sexual fetish or a disorder that has been "dressed up" by the Left to mimic heterosexual relationships in the name of broader societal acceptance. There's not even any evidence that homosexuals were "born that way" as we are so often told and people now just accept. In contrast, there's plenty of evidence that homosexuality is the result of conditioning, in many cases sexual abuse and trauma.
The normalization and acceptance of homosexuality was the destruction of the final rampart that held back the flood waters of degeneracy. There are no limits to how fare they're willing to go at this point.
Fair. I can absolutely believe that this is an expansion of the meaning of the word 'sex' from the 60s, from the likes of Money et al. You were right to call me out on it, for accepting that definition.
Its tough when we've been indoctrinated since birth by subverted media.
I feel like I have to analyze my word choices so I don't give the gay commies support inadvertently.