They're not trying to hide it, they're trying to make you say it. Normies, if forced to consider it, know just how much more mischief our swarthy friends get up to, but making you say it aloud either triggers decades of indoctrination, or scares them into slinking away.
As a former normie -- we really didn't know about Blacks. It was only when I got on 4chan, and they were posting easily verifiable things like the most-wanted list of Toronto, of all places, and every one was black. And then murder rates, and rape rates and the knockout game...
The purpose is not to hide negro behaviour in the present day, the purpose is to create the narrative about the current year in the future.
Normies today look at recordings of negroes from 1950s singing about love and dancing in classy clothes, and the narrative builds in their minds that these people aren't different from us and that modern day negro behaviour is a fluke.
Likewise, in 50 years people will roam archives of the internet (they will be different from people are archiving today) and will unironically believe that negroes were the victims of white supremacists.
But isn't it risky to do this? Can't something happen in the future that will make whites realise the truth?
It certainly can, but by that time whites will be 20% of the population, while negroes will be a majority. Then it won't matter.
Wasnt there a swarm of black kids that murdered an elderly old black man walking on the street? 2 of the perps were black girls that threw traffic cone and pushed him into the ground.
"Women's empowerment" encourages them to abandon their usual passive aggression for overt violence. Backbiting, innuendo, false rape accusations, and character assassination are no longer satisfactory.
And they rely on the double standard that remains in place despite all the bad gas about "equality."
They're "equal to men" when they form packs and murder men on the street, but if a man attempts to defend himself from violent women with equal or overwhelming force he's a "woman beater."
With the school system being an indoctrination center, and parental rights and guidance just one phone call from being tossed in the crapper, I'd say this thinking is 30 years out of date.
Its not the solution any more. At least not by itself.
Undisclosed does all the disclosing we need.
/coughs in Coulter
They don’t realize that going out of their way to not mention the race makes it extremely obvious?
They don’t care about the people who see through the charade.
They're not trying to hide it, they're trying to make you say it. Normies, if forced to consider it, know just how much more mischief our swarthy friends get up to, but making you say it aloud either triggers decades of indoctrination, or scares them into slinking away.
As a former normie -- we really didn't know about Blacks. It was only when I got on 4chan, and they were posting easily verifiable things like the most-wanted list of Toronto, of all places, and every one was black. And then murder rates, and rape rates and the knockout game...
The purpose is not to hide negro behaviour in the present day, the purpose is to create the narrative about the current year in the future.
Normies today look at recordings of negroes from 1950s singing about love and dancing in classy clothes, and the narrative builds in their minds that these people aren't different from us and that modern day negro behaviour is a fluke.
Likewise, in 50 years people will roam archives of the internet (they will be different from people are archiving today) and will unironically believe that negroes were the victims of white supremacists.
But isn't it risky to do this? Can't something happen in the future that will make whites realise the truth?
It certainly can, but by that time whites will be 20% of the population, while negroes will be a majority. Then it won't matter.
They are betting some people will just hear "children"
Direct link to the fucking CBC? Come on bro!
Archive link: https://archive.ph/f8vWx
No fathers, but multiple sperm donors.
Must have been syncing periods
13 does 60
This actually breaks the model somewhat, as more black males are criminals then black females. Regardless, it is still relevant.
This is what happens when women's behaviour is unconstrained by men (who will go to prison if they do).
Wasnt there a swarm of black kids that murdered an elderly old black man walking on the street? 2 of the perps were black girls that threw traffic cone and pushed him into the ground.
or the girls that carjacked and killed a guy over a phone.
There's no shortage of murder stories involving young girls targeting grown men.
This is what happens when you don't listen to the people who are telling you that women's pacifism is solely a product of fear of retaliation.
Yes.
"Women's empowerment" encourages them to abandon their usual passive aggression for overt violence. Backbiting, innuendo, false rape accusations, and character assassination are no longer satisfactory.
And they rely on the double standard that remains in place despite all the bad gas about "equality."
They're "equal to men" when they form packs and murder men on the street, but if a man attempts to defend himself from violent women with equal or overwhelming force he's a "woman beater."
At least someone gets it.
And they're mostly black.
Which makes you almost think there's a pattern of black criminality, in part due to genetics.
Or would, if you could get over yourself.
Any excuse to defend women, eh?
It can't be genetics, because this shit only started happening recently. Genetics don't change that fast.
What does is the flimsy social contract that made people believe they actually opposed violence.
"It can't be genetics, because this shit only started happening recently."
Uh...what?
Have you seen what a shithole africa always has been?
I missed this reply.
I'm confused, are you suggesting young girls attacked homeless men in the past? This is a new thing, a new way for them to get their dopamine flowing.
We really should trial them as males, we don't know how they identify, after all.
I agree. The Cathedral has spent the last sixty years telling women they are the same as men, why not accommodate them?
where are their parents?
charge the guardians for the crimes of their charges, watch this shit end real quick.
With the school system being an indoctrination center, and parental rights and guidance just one phone call from being tossed in the crapper, I'd say this thinking is 30 years out of date.
Its not the solution any more. At least not by itself.
come on guys, don't be a collectivist
As long as the youths are just roaming around removing homeless, I’m not totally against it.
The roaming youths will murder. They can’t help it. So all we can do as a society is hope for more ethical targets.
Damn, wasted my youth doing my roaming and murdering in games instead of reality.
Lost childhood!
God forbid anyone calls this a feminist attack, we have to race bait.
A negro woman is the worst of both horrible demographics, so take your pick.
I know it's a low bar to clear, but wild apes still do not have the intelligence to be feminists
But they will take the leavings of feminists and go on a cocaine binge.
How much intelligence does it take to think "men bad, kill them".
Welcome back it's not the same when you get temp banned