"Women's empowerment" encourages them to abandon their usual passive aggression for overt violence. Backbiting, innuendo, false rape accusations, and character assassination are no longer satisfactory.
And they rely on the double standard that remains in place despite all the bad gas about "equality."
They're "equal to men" when they form packs and murder men on the street, but if a man attempts to defend himself from violent women with equal or overwhelming force he's a "woman beater."
There's no shortage of murder stories involving young girls targeting grown men.
This is what happens when you don't listen to the people who are telling you that women's pacifism is solely a product of fear of retaliation.
Yes.
"Women's empowerment" encourages them to abandon their usual passive aggression for overt violence. Backbiting, innuendo, false rape accusations, and character assassination are no longer satisfactory.
And they rely on the double standard that remains in place despite all the bad gas about "equality."
They're "equal to men" when they form packs and murder men on the street, but if a man attempts to defend himself from violent women with equal or overwhelming force he's a "woman beater."
At least someone gets it.
And they're mostly black.
Which makes you almost think there's a pattern of black criminality, in part due to genetics.
Or would, if you could get over yourself.
Any excuse to defend women, eh?
It can't be genetics, because this shit only started happening recently. Genetics don't change that fast.
What does is the flimsy social contract that made people believe they actually opposed violence.
"It can't be genetics, because this shit only started happening recently."
Uh...what?
Have you seen what a shithole africa always has been?
I missed this reply.
I'm confused, are you suggesting young girls attacked homeless men in the past? This is a new thing, a new way for them to get their dopamine flowing.