Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

48
Femshevik cunts suing Elon Musk's Twitter, claims Twitter layoffs of cunts "targeted women". (media.kotakuinaction2.win)
posted 3 years ago by anonymous570861 3 years ago by anonymous570861 +48 / -0
23 comments download share
23 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (23)
sorted by:
▲ 43 ▼
– TriangleGang 43 points 3 years ago +43 / -0

If by "targeted women" they mean "targeted the demonstrably lowest performers", then yes.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– Kienan 16 points 3 years ago +16 / -0

Oy vey.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– lapalapa 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

I wonder if that's illegal in the state.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– TriangleGang 15 points 3 years ago +15 / -0

Well, I can say this with absolute certainly: if the lowest X% were to contain a "disproportionate" amount of women or minorities, their lawyer would argue that failing to take gender and racial "equity" into consideration and simply firing them as a block based on performance was discriminatory. They would seamlessly pivot from "women are equal" to "women are lesser and need special considerations" without a hint of shame.

He'd probably win too, in today's clown world.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– yvaN_ehT_nioJ 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

God I hate "disparate impact"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– TomSeeSaw 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Moving to Texas in .....

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– J_Darnley 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Probably. Isn't the US legal term "disparate impact"? Meaning an action is illegal if it negatively affects some protected group more than others.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– FuckGenderPolitics 21 points 3 years ago +21 / -0

Maybe learn a real skill instead of being a parasite in a grifter department?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– dekachin 17 points 3 years ago +17 / -0

women simply aren't as competent as men and should get used to being laid off more from serious jobs.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 14 points 3 years ago +14 / -0

I'll love to see this in court as this is essentially "he told us we had to work hard or he would accept our resignation, he was targeting women by saying that!"

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Kienan 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Based and Holy Fuck Be Fucking Marginally Useful Please For the Love of God Pilled.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– TentElephant 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

Troons will never be women.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– LastRights 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

We've all seen the videos of female twitter employees. Absolutely nothing was lost. Want to see the pampered little princesses absolutely destroyed in the courts, but unfortunately the anti-Western feminist plague has corrupted the justice system as well.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– anonymous570861 [S] 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

Archived Sources

Archive Today: https://archive.vn/P7Bo7

Wayback Machine Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20221208165606/https://news.yahoo.com/latest-twitter-lawsuit-says-company-160741790.html

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– user20461 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

Good, I don't care for Elon. He's already telling you he's going to censor you just like the old regime and if you read between the lines, he is telling you he wants to decide the future of the country by only allowing the views that he approves of.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– You_Are_Based 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Maybe those women should have "targeted" job security. "Target" a training course. Instead they wanted to be paid to do nothing and chat on slack.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Kienan 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

You don't even need a course. Target doing your job and being useful.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– You_Are_Based 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

I disagree. Many had jobs that were actually useless no matter the efficiency they are performed with. Only solution would have been a horizontal career move based on actual tech related skills.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Adamrises 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Many had jobs that were actually useless no matter the efficiency they are performed with

And of course these are almost always the jobs dominated by women. Such as HR and "customer relations."

Make no connections between these two facts at all or you're a bigot.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Kienan 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Good point, I hadn't considered that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– GimmeFuelGimmeFire 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Oh they were horizontal alright

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Hogbutcher 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

At-will employees receive sobering verdict in 3...2...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Kweebecker 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

A fascinating accusation. Could they define "woman" for us, please?

permalink save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy