I went to a therapist a few times. I think it was good to talk about shit in a way that was more structured, with a person who didn't know me.
I'm not sure it would have been extremely useful to keep doing it continuously.
She was nice, though. Not really a super pretentious, new age type.
Therapy can be good, that said it is also good to talk about stuff to a friend or some anon on the internet.
The difference being in the effectiveness of each method but generally just talking about stuff will generally improve your mental state.
Just be careful not to get caught up in a echo chamber that makes you believe that you don't have a problem and you're good.
With all that a therapist who is very good might be a lot more effective that the other methods, emphasize on the "very good" part but they also charge for it and a bad therapist can also be far more damaging.
Think of arachnophobia - exposure therapy works great for that. You might not learn to love spiders and like them crawling over your body, but you will learn to get near enough to them that you can kill them.
I would assume that it helps people with social phobia the same way.
Then I believe in "crisis" therapy. As in you encountered a bad event in your life and you can talk through it with a therapist. Good therapists will not direct you to anything, but help you sort your own thoughts.
What I don't believe in is this "1 session / week for years" therapy in cases like trauma / depression. Therapy needs to be goal oriented and needs steady progress. If you don't have any progress and just visit your therapist once a week and that's it - basically treating them like a person who you just talk to, who doesn't challenge you, ... then it's a waste of time & money.
A good therapist though will tell you that and maybe offer to refer you to another therapist.
Only if if enables you to take action in some way.
If your life sucks and you're not sure why it might help you understand why you're having the problems you are. Identifying them allows them to be solved.
You underestimate the power of desperate foreigners in backwater countries. These people thirst for anything that moves and will dump their life savings on the fattest cows just to get noticed.
The way this is written, it's kinda a big self own as it indirectly implies a lot of women should not be in the workplace and they are happier at home, even willing to degrade themselves online than be in the workplace.
Imagine if she quit her job, stayed home, and did sexual favors for one man who pays her bills rather than a thousand.
Would this article still be celebrating her? Would it still imply that other women should follow her lead? Is staying at home and using your sexuality to pay the bills only empowerment on their terms?
I had an old school French professor in college who once said something like:
"You Americans are so bizarre. You will spend hundreds and thousands of dollars to pay for the privilege to lay on a couch and talk to a therapist. We know better in France. In France we go to Mass, we go into the confessional, we say what we feel bad about, the priest forgives us, and we're all better. For free!"
edit: was supposed to be under the therapy comment
I think people are missing the point of this article maybe... The point is not that she's doing only fans, the point is that teachers in America get paid among the lowest wage a teacher makes in any first world country. You know how hard it is being a teacher? I'd probably quit my job and become a whore too if I meant I could live above the poverty line.
Back when I lived among the dindus, they took the ball out of all the computer mice. When the school got new laser mice, they shredded the wires with knives. Eventually the dindus had to contend with the police. We didn't have the "Edward James Olmos staring you down til you shut the fuck up" type of teachers. That doesn't exist. The leftist groomers don't "teach" in dindu neighborhoods. It's always the white neighborhoods that vote Jackass, too.
And when we did have that hardass type of teacher, they were Mexican or black and built like shithouses. One of them was an actual Nigerian immigrant that didn't take any bullshit from bangers. Guess which teachers had well-behaved classes. Same as law enforcement and military and medical: women don't belong in those professions. Too weak. The "social worker" wanking is ineffective.
Both angles you describe would be a biased and partisan take on ideological journalism. Real journalism wouldn't take a side, and hence it wouldn't be news. This nonsense shouldn't be taking up anyone's time at all really. It's all distraction.
I went to a therapist a few times. I think it was good to talk about shit in a way that was more structured, with a person who didn't know me.
I'm not sure it would have been extremely useful to keep doing it continuously.
She was nice, though. Not really a super pretentious, new age type.
Getting better isn’t the point of therapy. Like all snake oil salesmen, they just want to sell you more.
Therapy can be good, that said it is also good to talk about stuff to a friend or some anon on the internet.
The difference being in the effectiveness of each method but generally just talking about stuff will generally improve your mental state.
Just be careful not to get caught up in a echo chamber that makes you believe that you don't have a problem and you're good.
With all that a therapist who is very good might be a lot more effective that the other methods, emphasize on the "very good" part but they also charge for it and a bad therapist can also be far more damaging.
Therapy is working.
Think of arachnophobia - exposure therapy works great for that. You might not learn to love spiders and like them crawling over your body, but you will learn to get near enough to them that you can kill them. I would assume that it helps people with social phobia the same way.
Then I believe in "crisis" therapy. As in you encountered a bad event in your life and you can talk through it with a therapist. Good therapists will not direct you to anything, but help you sort your own thoughts.
What I don't believe in is this "1 session / week for years" therapy in cases like trauma / depression. Therapy needs to be goal oriented and needs steady progress. If you don't have any progress and just visit your therapist once a week and that's it - basically treating them like a person who you just talk to, who doesn't challenge you, ... then it's a waste of time & money.
A good therapist though will tell you that and maybe offer to refer you to another therapist.
Exposure therapy to humans in social situations will help me learn to get close enough that I can kill them? Where do I sign up? :^)
Only if if enables you to take action in some way.
If your life sucks and you're not sure why it might help you understand why you're having the problems you are. Identifying them allows them to be solved.
If it's not that, then probably not helpful.
Fetish stuff, 1000%. Feeding fetish, or some disgusting stuff about her crushing people/animals/things.
They did a mockery of this on king of the hill. "So here's a $100, go stick your feet in some corn beef hash or baby food"
She's fat and ugly. I suppose some people will masturbate to anything, but she's about as appetizing as a bar of soap . . . less, actually.
I’d much rather rub a bar of soap against my dick than this chick.
You underestimate the power of desperate foreigners in backwater countries. These people thirst for anything that moves and will dump their life savings on the fattest cows just to get noticed.
The way this is written, it's kinda a big self own as it indirectly implies a lot of women should not be in the workplace and they are happier at home, even willing to degrade themselves online than be in the workplace.
At least now she’s not teaching children.
Never underestimate the simps and their 'fetish'.
Let women choose to be anything and most will choose whore.
Imagine if she quit her job, stayed home, and did sexual favors for one man who pays her bills rather than a thousand.
Would this article still be celebrating her? Would it still imply that other women should follow her lead? Is staying at home and using your sexuality to pay the bills only empowerment on their terms?
Becoming an OnlyFans model != making money as an OF model
I don't even know what to say. I pray for God's perfect judgement.
Coomers just wanna coom dude, they'll take any path open to them
I had an old school French professor in college who once said something like:
"You Americans are so bizarre. You will spend hundreds and thousands of dollars to pay for the privilege to lay on a couch and talk to a therapist. We know better in France. In France we go to Mass, we go into the confessional, we say what we feel bad about, the priest forgives us, and we're all better. For free!"
edit: was supposed to be under the therapy comment
Le Catholic Americans do the same thing.
I let you judge how well it works.
I think people are missing the point of this article maybe... The point is not that she's doing only fans, the point is that teachers in America get paid among the lowest wage a teacher makes in any first world country. You know how hard it is being a teacher? I'd probably quit my job and become a whore too if I meant I could live above the poverty line.
Back when I lived among the dindus, they took the ball out of all the computer mice. When the school got new laser mice, they shredded the wires with knives. Eventually the dindus had to contend with the police. We didn't have the "Edward James Olmos staring you down til you shut the fuck up" type of teachers. That doesn't exist. The leftist groomers don't "teach" in dindu neighborhoods. It's always the white neighborhoods that vote Jackass, too.
And when we did have that hardass type of teacher, they were Mexican or black and built like shithouses. One of them was an actual Nigerian immigrant that didn't take any bullshit from bangers. Guess which teachers had well-behaved classes. Same as law enforcement and military and medical: women don't belong in those professions. Too weak. The "social worker" wanking is ineffective.
Both angles you describe would be a biased and partisan take on ideological journalism. Real journalism wouldn't take a side, and hence it wouldn't be news. This nonsense shouldn't be taking up anyone's time at all really. It's all distraction.