Yes there is that much money, it will have to be diverted away from productive capacity and into "carbon reduction", which will not increase standard of living for people. The bill can also be paid via inflation, either way the hardest hit will be middle class and poor.
I'm sure when an electric bill is $1000 /month people are going to be so thankful that atmospheric CO2 is 421.3 instead of 421.7 ppm.
Just because someone has an incorrect mindset, doesn't mean they must be wrong 100% of the time. The fallacy fallacy. Or in simpler words: broken clocks are right twice a day.
Or more likely, he was telling a joke. A humorous statement.
I value honesty over all else, if people do that type of negotiating tactic, to me, the only possible result is just to cease negotiations. "We are not in a situation where anything near where you are asking would be in the realm of practical, and if you're lying about that being in your realm of practical in order to inflate sales, I must also assume you're lying about your products in order to inflate sales. While I hope it is the former and we might be able to do business in the future, either way, I must cease business relations as things stand."
People have accused me of doing hardball tactics because of this stance, but I'm fine with a back and forth flow of negotiation, but you gotta start in a realistic realm. If you're not within about 10% of what I'm expecting your slightly hopeful opening offer to be, I'm out. Why would anyone freely do business with a known liar?
Translation: we need to force another global depression as a cover for our depopulation goals to make people desperate enough to surrender the last vestiges of their autonomy and accept a New World Order. Also money laundering, a whole lot of money laundering. The Ukraine grift isn't going to last much longer.
There is a consolidated push from all angles to set up a massive fund or several massive funds to power these global control systems. They are conflating climate change with pandemic danger, war danger, and 'systemic injustice' (ie. poor people existing) to create the justification for it, through an all out propaganda barrage atm.
One guy coming at this same goal from another angle is Jeffrey Sachs who wants money for the WHO:
One of the United States' preeminent economists told a Wilson Center audience that the international community must address shortcomings in global health if it is serious about addressing global poverty. Jeffrey Sachs, Harvard University professor and chair of the World Health Organization's Commission on Macroeconomics and Health, said that $35-$40 per capita annually—one penny out of every ten dollars of developed-country GNP—would alleviate the world's most fatal diseases and allow poor countries to participate fully in the global economy.
Obviously it goes without saying Sachs has been big on climate change alarmism in the past too, and before that he was all about restructuring the world through IMF loans. Most recently he likes to show up on dissident podcasts eg. Russell Brand's and pretend to be a down to earth truthteller, while scaremongering about the war in Ukraine. It is all part of the same push.
Although I have to agree with some commenters that the exact figure barely even matters tbh, since they're hoping to preside over a world of CBDCs and fictitious economies that only reflect the value of the latest WEF dictat. The point is to get everyone to accept the principle of living on sufferance, while toiling to service a perpetual moral burden. That's how they'll build on the cult of progressivism and re-inject a sense of purpose back into the world for the cattle to live by, filling the void created by the nihilism that the elites have fed to us.
Fiat is not supply locked so, why not? All that matters is that they can squeeze people enough to make them labour under their systems. The math literally does not matter because it will always be married to other maths to ensure those conditions. They can spend zero on this, they can spend infinity, the result will be the same and Earth and all it's humans will continue to spin in circles.
Yes there is that much money, it will have to be diverted away from productive capacity and into "carbon reduction", which will not increase standard of living for people. The bill can also be paid via inflation, either way the hardest hit will be middle class and poor.
I'm sure when an electric bill is $1000 /month people are going to be so thankful that atmospheric CO2 is 421.3 instead of 421.7 ppm.
I hope one day the cult of climate change will be exposed for the scam it is
Just saying, when women were thrown into volcanoes to appease the gods, we didn't have climate change.
I would have thought you considered religion tradcuckery.
Just because someone has an incorrect mindset, doesn't mean they must be wrong 100% of the time. The fallacy fallacy. Or in simpler words: broken clocks are right twice a day.
Or more likely, he was telling a joke. A humorous statement.
It's clearly a joke. I'm not advocating for human sacrifice.
No, you just advocate for the collective suicide of the entire human race. Totally different.
Artificial wombs =/= extinction…
My man, the things you say while serious sound like jokes. Who can ever tell
421.3? More like 421.8 which is down from 421.7 citizen.
The real global empire demanding tribute or they will replace us with more willing slaves.
"If we ask for $10 trillion, we can settle for $1 trillion and pretend we came down 90%"
it's a dumb negotiation trick even a child could think of.
I value honesty over all else, if people do that type of negotiating tactic, to me, the only possible result is just to cease negotiations. "We are not in a situation where anything near where you are asking would be in the realm of practical, and if you're lying about that being in your realm of practical in order to inflate sales, I must also assume you're lying about your products in order to inflate sales. While I hope it is the former and we might be able to do business in the future, either way, I must cease business relations as things stand."
People have accused me of doing hardball tactics because of this stance, but I'm fine with a back and forth flow of negotiation, but you gotta start in a realistic realm. If you're not within about 10% of what I'm expecting your slightly hopeful opening offer to be, I'm out. Why would anyone freely do business with a known liar?
Only works if the negotiating opposite wont just tell you to go pound sand.
It's economic warfare on the lower and middle class in the West.
Whether it exists or not, the WEF will find it.
On a completely unrelated note - Why are you taking a break? Get back to work slave!
Translation: we need to force another global depression as a cover for our depopulation goals to make people desperate enough to surrender the last vestiges of their autonomy and accept a New World Order. Also money laundering, a whole lot of money laundering. The Ukraine grift isn't going to last much longer.
They use currency not money and they print it out of thin air.
There is a consolidated push from all angles to set up a massive fund or several massive funds to power these global control systems. They are conflating climate change with pandemic danger, war danger, and 'systemic injustice' (ie. poor people existing) to create the justification for it, through an all out propaganda barrage atm.
One guy coming at this same goal from another angle is Jeffrey Sachs who wants money for the WHO:
Obviously it goes without saying Sachs has been big on climate change alarmism in the past too, and before that he was all about restructuring the world through IMF loans. Most recently he likes to show up on dissident podcasts eg. Russell Brand's and pretend to be a down to earth truthteller, while scaremongering about the war in Ukraine. It is all part of the same push.
Although I have to agree with some commenters that the exact figure barely even matters tbh, since they're hoping to preside over a world of CBDCs and fictitious economies that only reflect the value of the latest WEF dictat. The point is to get everyone to accept the principle of living on sufferance, while toiling to service a perpetual moral burden. That's how they'll build on the cult of progressivism and re-inject a sense of purpose back into the world for the cattle to live by, filling the void created by the nihilism that the elites have fed to us.
Fiat is not supply locked so, why not? All that matters is that they can squeeze people enough to make them labour under their systems. The math literally does not matter because it will always be married to other maths to ensure those conditions. They can spend zero on this, they can spend infinity, the result will be the same and Earth and all it's humans will continue to spin in circles.
give the government all your money to make the sky less angry!
It's fine, we'll just print more.
I will be sure to burn more charcoal and drive my truck more often.
I wonder if they will hold china and India accountable for all their emissions? Probably not only western countries will have to reduce their carbon
So they're going to build nuclear power plants?
Greta Thunberg.