I can only imagine soy faggots like that buy into The Narrative so they can feel superior to SOMEONE. "Oh those poor blacks need my help, that's why I let Tyrone pounds my wife like yesterday's beef".
Blacks actually have the right to have majority Congressional districts. If a state has 30% blacks, and they don't get 30% districts with black majority -- not even representation -- majority -- they can and do sue. Of course this is only possible to do on a geographic basis because of the self-segregation they whine about so much.
Wikipedia's donation nags should be a violation of false advertising or fraud laws. Only an insignificant fraction of the money they bring in goes to web hosting.
Just simply enforcing laws against corporations and activist groups would solve many of our problems. Might even go a step further here and demand non-profits
post links to transparent spending breakdowns and past performance with every solicitation.
If laws against money laundering were enforced, many politicians would be committing crimes or have to give up their revenue, so it doesn't happen. As always, cui bono
No it isn’t. It’s a tower guarded by trannies on any political topic. For other topics they have incorrect information they refuse to fix even if the subject of the article attempts to make the correction.
And even if it is correct, it's written in the most nonsensical way possible. But that's what happens when you raise teenagers to conflate volume with substance.
I know there have been some edit wars and see resulting biased articles, but overall I think its a great concept and well executed. Its not like you can create a completely neutral encyclopedia using volunteers in the current political climate.
My issue is more that they CLAIM to be politically neutral, ask for funds etc but are biased as fuck with some people akin to power jannies writing most of the wikipedia with a clear bias. I don't see the point of an encyclopedia that is skewing what real like actually looks like to fit a narrative or "the message".
I'm amazed they can host one of the most trafficked sites on the Internet for 2.4m dollars. There are several countries where Wikipedia is the number one visited site.
I like that the article achnowlages how amazing wikipedia is. Even though its no longer totally neutral its still the largest and least biased repository of human knowlage ever created. It saddens me to hear that my donations instead of funding that, have been funding woke activism. I'll be donating elsewhere in the future.
This shit sent me lol…
The beta male cucks coming to Wikipedia’s rescue in that thread are pathetic
I can only imagine soy faggots like that buy into The Narrative so they can feel superior to SOMEONE. "Oh those poor blacks need my help, that's why I let Tyrone pounds my wife like yesterday's beef".
Notice they capitalised black but not White.
Exactly that's what sent me, how ironic
"ByzanTony" (play on Byzantium I assume)
"TraditionSeeker"
"Pink haired possible-girl in picture"
Ah the consistency.
yes, your imaginary "equality" is culture war. name one right they lack.
Blacks actually have the right to have majority Congressional districts. If a state has 30% blacks, and they don't get 30% districts with black majority -- not even representation -- majority -- they can and do sue. Of course this is only possible to do on a geographic basis because of the self-segregation they whine about so much.
Whites have no such right.
I'm going to say it: yes, it is, because it always involves tearing white people down.
Wikipedia's donation nags should be a violation of false advertising or fraud laws. Only an insignificant fraction of the money they bring in goes to web hosting.
Just simply enforcing laws against corporations and activist groups would solve many of our problems. Might even go a step further here and demand non-profits post links to transparent spending breakdowns and past performance with every solicitation.
If laws against money laundering were enforced, many politicians would be committing crimes or have to give up their revenue, so it doesn't happen. As always, cui bono
Holy shit. Look at the amount in 'salary' and check the number of 'employees/contractors'.
I am so glad I never paid them a dime. Thank you Jack Sparrow.
Ive never donated to them and I never will.
Wikipedia is legit amazing and deserves donations. They're just diverting the money elsewhere.
No it isn’t. It’s a tower guarded by trannies on any political topic. For other topics they have incorrect information they refuse to fix even if the subject of the article attempts to make the correction.
And even if it is correct, it's written in the most nonsensical way possible. But that's what happens when you raise teenagers to conflate volume with substance.
To illustrate that, pick any card game and look it up on Wikipedia.
You will read 12 paragraphs and have 0 idea how to play the game.
Wikipedia is legit pozzed and deserves to burn.
Two words: Gamergate article. That is all I need to say.
I know there have been some edit wars and see resulting biased articles, but overall I think its a great concept and well executed. Its not like you can create a completely neutral encyclopedia using volunteers in the current political climate.
My issue is more that they CLAIM to be politically neutral, ask for funds etc but are biased as fuck with some people akin to power jannies writing most of the wikipedia with a clear bias. I don't see the point of an encyclopedia that is skewing what real like actually looks like to fit a narrative or "the message".
I don't disagree about power jannies skewing articles, but that would still be a problem even if you assume the platform is 100% neutral.
They haven't needed your money for a LONG time. I don't like the wiki concept either, and would rather support alternative information databases.
Check cleared yet?
Laundery is a woke way of life.
This is terrorist financing.
I'm amazed they can host one of the most trafficked sites on the Internet for 2.4m dollars. There are several countries where Wikipedia is the number one visited site.
Left-leaning organization is laundering money? Imagine my shock...
I like that the article achnowlages how amazing wikipedia is. Even though its no longer totally neutral its still the largest and least biased repository of human knowlage ever created. It saddens me to hear that my donations instead of funding that, have been funding woke activism. I'll be donating elsewhere in the future.