I know there have been some edit wars and see resulting biased articles, but overall I think its a great concept and well executed. Its not like you can create a completely neutral encyclopedia using volunteers in the current political climate.
My issue is more that they CLAIM to be politically neutral, ask for funds etc but are biased as fuck with some people akin to power jannies writing most of the wikipedia with a clear bias. I don't see the point of an encyclopedia that is skewing what real like actually looks like to fit a narrative or "the message".
Two words: Gamergate article. That is all I need to say.
I know there have been some edit wars and see resulting biased articles, but overall I think its a great concept and well executed. Its not like you can create a completely neutral encyclopedia using volunteers in the current political climate.
My issue is more that they CLAIM to be politically neutral, ask for funds etc but are biased as fuck with some people akin to power jannies writing most of the wikipedia with a clear bias. I don't see the point of an encyclopedia that is skewing what real like actually looks like to fit a narrative or "the message".
I don't disagree about power jannies skewing articles, but that would still be a problem even if you assume the platform is 100% neutral.