No it isn’t. It’s a tower guarded by trannies on any political topic. For other topics they have incorrect information they refuse to fix even if the subject of the article attempts to make the correction.
And even if it is correct, it's written in the most nonsensical way possible. But that's what happens when you raise teenagers to conflate volume with substance.
I know there have been some edit wars and see resulting biased articles, but overall I think its a great concept and well executed. Its not like you can create a completely neutral encyclopedia using volunteers in the current political climate.
My issue is more that they CLAIM to be politically neutral, ask for funds etc but are biased as fuck with some people akin to power jannies writing most of the wikipedia with a clear bias. I don't see the point of an encyclopedia that is skewing what real like actually looks like to fit a narrative or "the message".
Ive never donated to them and I never will.
Wikipedia is legit amazing and deserves donations. They're just diverting the money elsewhere.
No it isn’t. It’s a tower guarded by trannies on any political topic. For other topics they have incorrect information they refuse to fix even if the subject of the article attempts to make the correction.
And even if it is correct, it's written in the most nonsensical way possible. But that's what happens when you raise teenagers to conflate volume with substance.
To illustrate that, pick any card game and look it up on Wikipedia.
You will read 12 paragraphs and have 0 idea how to play the game.
Wikipedia is legit pozzed and deserves to burn.
Two words: Gamergate article. That is all I need to say.
I know there have been some edit wars and see resulting biased articles, but overall I think its a great concept and well executed. Its not like you can create a completely neutral encyclopedia using volunteers in the current political climate.
My issue is more that they CLAIM to be politically neutral, ask for funds etc but are biased as fuck with some people akin to power jannies writing most of the wikipedia with a clear bias. I don't see the point of an encyclopedia that is skewing what real like actually looks like to fit a narrative or "the message".
They haven't needed your money for a LONG time. I don't like the wiki concept either, and would rather support alternative information databases.
Check cleared yet?