Who Will Win America's Next Civil War?
(www.youtube.com)
Comments (41)
sorted by:
Text BOOGALOO to 1776 to cast your vote now.
Saw this video in my recommended a few days ago, was really well constructed and well argued.
It does outline it well, if push came to shove and violence is on the table, the left lose immediately. Which is why they are on their demonisation and degradation tour, they need everyone so blackpilled they won't fight back because even if a small group does they're fucked. And the hidden point of the military is a lot of soldiers left because they refused the vaccine. Those are basically free insurgents for the right if things get hot.
The Chinese.
Yep. A civil war would become a proxy war between other powers. Weapons and aid would be given to both sides in whichever proportions would make the war longer, so as to decimate USA's power once it's all settled.
Hint, not the blacks and not the white left. The former will lash out at anything within reach once resources become scarce, and the only thing in reach is the latter.
The cities will burn in their own flames.
The only candidates for the future is the white right and the Hispanics.
FASCISM.
IS NOT.
RIGHT WING.
Yes, national socialism is still socialism
The only way another American Civil War happens is if it is part of a larger World War, but our "leaders" are sleepwalking us into a World War so who knows.
This video is bad and the creator should feel bad.
The side with the military, which is to say the establishment, Blue.
The same military that was defeated by Vietnamese and Afghans? Ok.
Yeah and right now they're having even more of an issue getting recruitment and Americans have way more guns. It's just that it would probably take more for the average American to go into full guerilla warfare.
A large majority of military personnel are conservatives.
The military would as a general rule not use force against fellow Americans, and certainly wouldn't be slaughtering civilians. Most military hardware is simply not useful in an insurgency where the fighting takes place in cities among civilians.
Your information is out of date
The left was willing to hamstring American forces abroad with restrictive rules of engagement. When used to put down rebellion, the gloves will be off entirely.
It is a well known phenomenon that Trump supporters do not answer polls. A poll conducted by the Military Times of soldiers is going to magnify this effect immensely.
Yeah. Anyone right wing who answers any political poll is straight retarded.
Like the other guys data pointed out, this isnt as true as it used to be.
However, his data also leaves out a little bit of info that was found in another one I saw: Almost all of the left-wing shift in the military was concentrated among the General Staff and extremely high level officers. The actual trigger-pullers, NCO's, and field officers? Still largely conservative or libertarian. Marines being the single largest profession of donors to Trump, and it wasnt even close
So take heart in that I suppose.
EDIT: Sidenote, I like this channel, and have been watching him for well over a year. He had another video I posed about back then that he outlined what the 21st century would ultimately become, and its good for us who value freedom and liberty.
All branches of the military today are full of leftist faggot retards. The military in Curreny Year is a government gibs program, so it shouldn't come as a shock.
This. The entire video completely ignores which set of people are exhibiting the the will to power. It goes on and on about how fighting age males skew right, but it completely overlooks everything that we actually see happening.
I think the biggest blindspot in writing off wimpy leftist men is forgetting that their degenerate life of consooming product and watching tranny porn means they are all rootless with nothing to lose, no relationships, no families to leave behind if they die.
The media likes to paint this pictures were incels are all right wingers but that's a smoke screen for the reality that incels only become right wing when they stop swallowing the lies they've been raised to believe women want. Until that moment they're they're sensitive nice guy white knights that no girl wants to touch, and no journalist is going to talk about until they go rogue.
This is all correct, but I don't think that it implies that they're wiling to fight and die. It's precisely because they live such empty lives that they have nothing that they would be willing to die for. What would motivate them to give up their cushy lives of watching tranny porn and woke media? It's one thing to go out with a bang and take as many as possible with you. That's the real danger of the radicalized soy boy. Actually making the sacrifices to fight in a war would require them to have a) something they're willing to die for and b) a willingness to make sacrifices themselves instead of getting some other sucker to do it for them. There's no reason to believe that they wouldn't expect someone else to make the actual sacrifice like they always do. It's not like they care all that much anyway. They only got on this crazy train because they thought it would be a good way to convince some pink haired land whale to touch their dick.
Somehow those also tend to be the selfish cowards who value their life and safety above all else. You say "nothing to lose" but their life of consooming is very precious.
Fighting back would make us just as bad as them, if not worse!
Didn't think I'd need sarcasm tags on this sub
pretending to be an idiot and being an idiot are the same thing.
When you can't tell the difference perhaps. Personally, their comment elicited a hearty chuckle from me because I instantly could tell it was sarcasm.
Left wing violence is a dial.
Right wing violence is a light switch.
If you actually believe that, then you havent been paying attention. "Team red", as you call them, has momentum on our side and looks poised to win without even having to resort to a fight. Because there is more to will than just shooting someone.
A New Counterculture? If the Right captures some of the Left’s youthful energy and rebellious cachet, it would represent a tectonic cultural and political shift. - https://amgreatness.com/2022/09/25/a-new-counterculture/
That's a serious possibility if we play our cards right. Since the left controls all the main cultural institutions just being a right winger is a rebellious thing to do. It's also a major reason that the left like to pretend to be the underdog. They know that being the rebel appeals to a lot of youth. The youth vote going to the Dems is also a pretty new thing. It only started 30 years ago. Reagan did just fine with the under 40 crowd. We do need serious energy though. Ghouls like McConnell are dead weights. We need someone who can offer the youth something more appealing than the free shit the left offers.
I remember it being considered a bit of a shift actually, when Reagan was popular with college kids for a while; it's the whole point of the humour behind Alex Keaton (and really, the whole basis of Family Ties - the parents were Democrat-voting hippies, but the girls were materialistic mallrat slackers and Alex was a Republican sock puppet) and a Bloom County series making fun of the phenomenon. The previous generation were the hippies, so, yeah, Reagan was just a kind of setback in a leftward march that began in the 60s (though the roots were probably even earlier than that, because the hippies were influenced by older people themselves.)
People on "Team Red" in general have more to lose, which means they're harder to get to risk it all in open conflict. Team Blue has a much larger base of degenerate gutter trash to recruit violent Useful Idiots from.
Dear avenger reborn
At 16:28 it has state borders shown. It's Mississippi, Arkansas and Louisiana. When slaves were "sold down the river" that's where they ended up.