Actually, no. It's like libeling Hunter Biden or Charles Manson. It's impossible to demonize someone who wants to discuss sexuality with young children.
He means demonise has the implication of being mischaracterisation rather than descriptive. If they are already a demon, you can't demonise them (turn them into a demon). Colloquially, he's just being pedantic.
I mean, he probably didn't really know the definition of the word since it's been used as a "bad thing" for so long. But we are in fact portraying them as wicket and threatening because that's what they are.
This is so typical of how they frame things. They can never acknowledge their ideas are just legitimately unpopular. It's always the fault of someone "normalizing" groomer as an insult or "alt-right pipeline" on YouTube or whatever. It can never be that they are just fucking wrong.
People who aren't just lying, but really believe to remember things from early infancy were, oh irony, groomed.
Like that fad a few decades ago of ''recovered memories''. Therapists would ''guide'' patients into ''remembering trauma'' as babies to explain the problems they experienced as teens or adults.
A wave of false accusations of parents molesting them as babies followed.
Hey, here is it again, that theme of ''Progressives'' making shit-up to severe people's ties with their family.
Mentally ill people really want their mental illness to be validated. It turns out that the democrats want that too since it's part of intersectionality
Children don't need to hear about your sex life you fucking pedophile. Insisting on telling them about it makes you a groomer.
It's like a mental form of child molestation
You're supposed to demonize demons. That's what the word is supposed to mean.
The fact they refuse to back off when people complain about how that shit is inappropriate shows that the bullshit is a propaganda scheme.
Is it possible to 'demonize' 'educators' who discuss sexuality or gender identity with YOUNG CHILDREN?
We didn't make the groomers into demons. We are just pointing it out that they are.
I mean, yes it's possible, it's what we're trying to do.
The real question is : Is it bad that we want to demonize educators who discuss sex with young children ?
The answer is : No. The fuck. Burn those pedos.
Actually, no. It's like libeling Hunter Biden or Charles Manson. It's impossible to demonize someone who wants to discuss sexuality with young children.
Uh ? Of course it's possible. And it's a good thing.
de·mon·ize
verb
portray as wicked and threatening.
He means demonise has the implication of being mischaracterisation rather than descriptive. If they are already a demon, you can't demonise them (turn them into a demon). Colloquially, he's just being pedantic.
I mean, he probably didn't really know the definition of the word since it's been used as a "bad thing" for so long. But we are in fact portraying them as wicket and threatening because that's what they are.
they should stop before it evolves past calling them groomers.
Yes. And it's the right thing to do.
Can’t pray in school but this face pierced faggot can tell you how great sucking cock is- 2022
This is so typical of how they frame things. They can never acknowledge their ideas are just legitimately unpopular. It's always the fault of someone "normalizing" groomer as an insult or "alt-right pipeline" on YouTube or whatever. It can never be that they are just fucking wrong.
Yes.
They're really going hard and fast against "Groomer".
That's how you know it's effective.
They are demons.
"They are calling a spotted cat of the leopard family a leopard! How dare they!"
maybe they shouldn't be discussing that? it's not their place.
They toss “nazi” and “white supremacy” around willy-nilly, demonizing anyone who isn’t a radical leftist, and we’re not supposed to return the favor?
Litterally defending grooming children into trans cult, and they low-key brag this is Democrat's hill to stand on.
If sex talk is not acceptable by the water cooler at work, why is it okay for kids to hear in school?
The party that's been accusing.people of being in the closet for nigh on three decades? Get outta town.
If telling the truth is "demonizing", then isn't it a lot more damning of the ones being "demonized"?
Yes. And?
there are only two types of people in this world who discuss sex with children...
pedophiles, and oh wait no, that's just it. there's only one group. if you discuss sex with kids, you're a pedo. so don't be a pedo.
That's because Democrats and 'educators' who discuss sex with young children ARE! DEMONS!
(and Groomers)
Correct.
People who aren't just lying, but really believe to remember things from early infancy were, oh irony, groomed.
Like that fad a few decades ago of ''recovered memories''. Therapists would ''guide'' patients into ''remembering trauma'' as babies to explain the problems they experienced as teens or adults.
A wave of false accusations of parents molesting them as babies followed.
Hey, here is it again, that theme of ''Progressives'' making shit-up to severe people's ties with their family.
Mentally ill people really want their mental illness to be validated. It turns out that the democrats want that too since it's part of intersectionality