This looks like a list of top states that people are fleeing towards to escape from New York and California, then he worked backwards to come up with a metric for why they are bad.
The directive of "inclusion" is racism masquerading as equality, prioritizing certain individuals based on their race & sexual preferences while marginalizing white heterosexuality.
Well, but voting without being eligible is all the rage these days, so states that don't give a shit if the votes are valid (as long as they vote for what they want) are better than states that actually care about their residents. Duh.
Proud of my state making number nine because boys in dresses can't play ball with girls.
e: This isn't even a good list. TN has always had voter id so it should have "Voting Rights" as a negative, and we have a RvW trigger law so that should be a negative under "Healthcare". Come on. We should be at least second.
Combine an era of enhanced social consciousness with a growing worker shortage, and it explains why, now more than ever, companies are demanding that states offer a welcoming and inclusive environment for employees. We rate the states on livability factors like per capita crime rates and environmental quality. We look at inclusiveness in state laws, including protections against discrimination of all kinds, as well as voting rights. While the pandemic may be past the crisis stage, health care quality, outcomes, preparedness and public health spending remain in the spotlight. All are key drivers in this category.
People (well redditors) unironically believe that needing to show ID to vote = voter suppression whereas someone claiming to be you at the polls so your vote gets thrown out is voter rights
Such nonsense articles are targeted at liberal elites living in big cities in the "lower ranked" states to get them to pressure their governments to shift purple and blue. The ranking is (obviously) not based on any kind of metric, but tactically arranged based on where they want to apply pressure and how likely they think they'll succeed. The very top and very bottom aren't direct targets but are meant to serve as exemplars or extremes on a spectrum.
In other words they used made up bs to not put California and New York at the top. Then again I guess crime rates are part of “inclusion” now.
This looks like a list of top states that people are fleeing towards to escape from New York and California, then he worked backwards to come up with a metric for why they are bad.
Fuck off, “journalist.”
Pretty much what I expected after reading only the headline and the source. That's all you need to predict the contents of articles in CURRENT_YEAR.
The directive of "inclusion" is racism masquerading as equality, prioritizing certain individuals based on their race & sexual preferences while marginalizing white heterosexuality.
That’s what I was thinking
LOL, "Voting Rights" and "Inclusiveness" are prominent categories. I consider your low score a high score, commie bitches.
Voting rights: Can you vote in this state, if you're eligible? All states: YES.
These people are so fucking weird.
Well, but voting without being eligible is all the rage these days, so states that don't give a shit if the votes are valid (as long as they vote for what they want) are better than states that actually care about their residents. Duh.
Proud of my state making number nine because boys in dresses can't play ball with girls.
e: This isn't even a good list. TN has always had voter id so it should have "Voting Rights" as a negative, and we have a RvW trigger law so that should be a negative under "Healthcare". Come on. We should be at least second.
So this is the 'standard':
LOL! "Voting rights!" These people are a joke.
People (well redditors) unironically believe that needing to show ID to vote = voter suppression whereas someone claiming to be you at the polls so your vote gets thrown out is voter rights
The article slags TN because it's acted against the tranny lobby. Good for Tennessee.
I'd live in Knoxville or Nashville, no problem (but traffic around Nashville really sux).
Lol half of this suck cause they are black states and the other half is just nice red states. Arizona and South Carolina? Tennessee?
Such nonsense articles are targeted at liberal elites living in big cities in the "lower ranked" states to get them to pressure their governments to shift purple and blue. The ranking is (obviously) not based on any kind of metric, but tactically arranged based on where they want to apply pressure and how likely they think they'll succeed. The very top and very bottom aren't direct targets but are meant to serve as exemplars or extremes on a spectrum.
Sunshine = bad
Raising your own children = bad
Being so poor you need the government to pay for your health care = good
At least they got right, obesity = bad
Try South Dakota. They never locked down.
Unless your job requires North, in which case never mind.
Fargo or Bust!