Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

45
Feminist Director of Netflix’s ‘Blonde’: “If the audience doesn’t like it, that’s the fucking audience’s problem. It’s not running for public office.” (media.communities.win)
posted 4 years ago by Ahaus667 4 years ago by Ahaus667 +45 / -0
37 comments download share
37 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (37)
sorted by:
▲ 36 ▼
– deleted 36 points 4 years ago +36 / -0
▲ 17 ▼
– Adamrises 17 points 4 years ago +17 / -0

Monroe very much seems to be meme magic at work. Everyone was told she was some sex symbol, so people just assumed she was, and now she is elevated to this idol status based on being told she was an idol.

Add in a healthy helping of fat chicks attaching themselves to her "thickness" to justify their own (ignoring the relative difference) and her "at my worst" quote inspiring a few generations of attention whores to never improve, and you have a modern day mythological figure.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– yamez 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Monroe was "Thicc" in the same way a chopstick resembles a telephone pole. Anybody who thinks she was thick at all has clearly not seen many of her boudoir shoots or bikini shots. She was practically 2D at the waist. Just because she had large tits and wide hips doesn't mean she was thick--hell, if we used illustrations of her now, those same people would claim it's unrealistic and nobody has that shape!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

She's so thicc she's portrayed by...Ana De Armas. LMAO

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Adamrises 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

She was "thicc" in the actual sense that it was supposed to mean and that guys are attracted to. Before fatties dragged the word so far down it barely means anything. She was a size 6/8 dress. Which isn't large but also not skinny either.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Kaarous 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

I understand the obsession. It's an excuse to be a selfish cunt.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– OldBullLee 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

I don't understand the continued obsession with her mythology,

Homos love Marilyn Monroe. They fetishize her (listen to Elton John's "Candle in the Wind" for the cult's theme song).

Feminists also fetishize her because she slept around and felt guilty because of it. Of course, all the men in her life are to blame as women who sleep around and get fucked over are innocent victims of the patriarchy.

Her end was tragic--she was passed around by some very powerful men and either Kennedy's henchmen poisoned her to avoid a scandal or she snuffed herself out of humiliation and regret.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 18 ▼
– Smith1980 18 points 4 years ago +18 / -0

I’m so tired of this mindset. What if a chef had that mentality

permalink save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– Ahaus667 [S] 16 points 4 years ago +16 / -0

Some do, they go broke very quickly when they have to directly feed themselves.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– aboardthegravyboat 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Lots of restaurants do well catering to niche clients

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– kxitx 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

isn't that the plot to kitchen nightmares?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0

This is why Netflix needs to go bankrupt. They can do whatever they want and are in no way accountable to any audience.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Adamrises 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

They are more accountable than they seem. Its just way too many people just assume its a "necessary" sub you have no matter what, like a phone or power bill.

The reaction you get from people when they come over and you don't have Netflix proves how ubiquitous it has become. Which can change with enough force (ask the cable channels).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ApparentlyImAHeretic 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

he doesn't just use someone else's account

There's literally no downside to password sharing. I use it to watch older scifi and it's a good platform for that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Adamrises 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

someone else's

This may shock you. But that someone else is the one paying for it then.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– ApparentlyImAHeretic 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

and they'd still pay for it if I wasn't using it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– DefinitelyNotIGN 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Unless they're also "Sharing" it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– lgbtqwtfbbq 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

Relevant Calvin and Hobbes from 1992

What if the public doesn't like your work?

They're not supposed to like it!

This attitude has been common in the (subsidized) art world for a long time.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– evilplushie 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Calvin and hobbes is a classic

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– reidj 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

I don't think the people making the grant decisions care what the public thinks either.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– YouAreAPirate 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

Yes, you cannot make something for all people. People will enjoy different things and trying to court the mythical wider audience is a fool's errand. So shut the fuck up about gatekeeping and stop subverting existing shit.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Gizortnik 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

"It's also not a capitalist movie, which is why it doesn't make any fucking money, bigot!"

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Lurker404 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

If the audience doesn’t like it, that’s the fucking audience’s problem.

Is it though? All these canceled shows beg to differ.

I guess that's why these kind of people just love communism and socialism: that way people have to pay for their crap whether they like it or not.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– HusbandsLead 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Imagine being so far up your own ass to think this way.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– DefinitelyNotIGN 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

If they had an obligation or duty to make a good product, that would not be their opinions. Or at least, it would not be their verbalized opinions. It is only in a setting where they get the same result, success or failure, that they can act like that.

If you're making a hyper-niche product, what you don't say is "if the audience doesn't like it, that's the fucking audience's problem". Someone who actually cared if their work is well-received or not, successful or not, would say something instead like "we know our work's genre might not resonate with all audiences, but we're confident with the result and encourage everyone to at least give it a try. But if it's not for you, well, it's not for you."

We need to bring back responsibility.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ApparentlyImAHeretic 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

that is the attitude of someone not concerned with the success of their production.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– deleted 12 points 4 years ago +12 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– Gizortnik 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Probably a rape scene

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– DefinitelyNotIGN 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Who knows? But whether it is or not, there's PG-13 rape scenes in movies, it's all on how the scene is shot. Excessive gratuitousness and fan disservice can significantly change a scene's impact, for sure, but usually not in the right way.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Gizortnik 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Gratuitousness & fan disservice

These are the basic tenets of all Leftist movies.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– deleted 9 points 4 years ago +9 / -0
▲ 11 ▼
– blackestknight 11 points 4 years ago +11 / -0

If Netflix keeps funding projets that get 0 views and the audience doesn't like, Netflix ain't going to get paid for long.

Internally, they are very likely tracking what is and isn't catching on in their Originals. Probably why some don't get renewed for a 2nd season.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– blackestknight 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Nothing wrong with Female protagonists. Aliens was awesome.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– lapalapa 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

Subscriptions are a mistake.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– deleted 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy