The thought comes to mind because at some point this bullshit has to end, either with the collapse of society or the start of something new, and well, I'm genuinely curious at what everyone’s idea end state is, if you had the power to make your ideal society happen instantly, what would it look like?
I'm especially interested in the opinions of those who don't really like minorities, as well as our resident “woman hater”, but anyone and everyone’s free to reply. I'll edit mine into this post later, I gotta go back to work.
One where everyone leaves me the fuck alone
Sums it up quite nicely
This was always what I wanted even decades ago.
Nowadays what I prioritize is that I want nothing to do with leftists. I don't want to live among them, I don't want to hear their incessant whining and I don't want them making any decisions regarding my life.
Reminds me of that episode of TOS with the simulated war, but without the mandatory executions. We can add them back if people prefer.
Pacman is for conflict resolution. Joust is for duels to the death.
Amazing episode
Rollerball!
The future does not belong to beat 'em up players.
I would love this.
Ladies and gentlemen, it turns out the board used to decide abortion was not in regulation order. The lawyers will be forced to meet up at another spot and play Pacman Tournament deluxe. Paul's Barbecue is the expected location.
That would be so nice.
Not a huge fan of minorities having seen such a massive change in my home town's demographics over my lifetime and having spent a good chunk of my life living in neighborhoods where I am a minority. Make of that what you will...
City-States with population growth maximally dependent on reproduction of the seed populations. Seed population must be genetically/racially/ethnically/culturally similar enough to each other that they would all freely breed with each other. People join the community through marriage with a requirement that the marriage produces offspring. City-states should be kept small enough that these requirements can be maintained and enforced.
There's a deep truth hidden in those "I would never fuck a Republican" bumper stickers you see in leftist shitholes: if you have a society where two population groups will not freely breed with each other for whatever reason (cultural, racial, political, etc...), then what you really have are two societies. Which is a recipe for conflict if you try to construct a single political system which will govern them. So don't set yourself up where you have to try to do that.
Families rather than individuals should be the smallest externally-facing political unit, and individual families can decide how they wish to govern themselves. I haven't given much thought to much else, because I tend to be of the belief that organizational structures should be tailored to and serve the people constructing them. A political system governing Muslims will be quite different than one governing Mormons, which will be different than one governing Catholics. So the primary goal should be the maintenance and continuation of the people being governed.
Wow, this is the most tradcucked idea ever. Mandatory marriage to participate in society?!
Who said this was some "trad" society?
I mean, you're forcing people to marry. Can't get more trad than that.
Only outsiders, to not be considered "outsiders". I don't particularly care what the people who already have a blood relation to the founding stock of the society do, because they aren't "outsiders"
I took "join the community" to mean "this rule applies to would-be immigrants", in a way that forces them and their kids to assimilate. The practical value would be to keep that minimum of incoming gene flow to stave off long-term inbreeding in your hypothetical city-state.
Thing is, you want to keep it small, then you can't have "endless population growth", or you'll just wind up with the same stupid problems. Not everyone needs to breed, but breeding can be encouraged without totalitarianist bullshit when needs be (Baby Bonus was a nice incentive.)
Good question. I've thought of solutions to various problems in clown world but I haven't really thought much about how to put it all together into an ideal society. I guess I'll outline some principles my ideal society would be based on:
Feminism would be a banned ideology, the same way a number of European countries treat Nazism. This alone would improve things so much because men would once again have a stake in society and wouldn't have to worry about being condemned to poverty because family courts would be pro-family and hold women accountable for their bad behavior. This would increase the fertility rate dramatically because men wouldn't have to worry about their lives being ruined if they start a family. It would also make it easier for men to find women because the cock carousel wouldn't be a thing in the absence of "sexual liberation".
Grievance based ideology and policy (like DIE and affirmative action) would also be banned. Every benefit would be earned, which would once again give the most productive members of society a stake in it instead of being dictated to by worthless leeches.
Racial segregation would become a thing again by people's own choices. Different cultures don't mix well and they would naturally separate themselves in the absence of clown world social engineering. It wouldn't be 100% segregated because a civilized black family living in a white neighborhood might still be a thing, but people would live among their own kind for the most part. Civilized people would be so much more productive if their neighbors weren't noisy and violent animals.
LGB's would be given a choice: They can do what they want in the bedroom if they act like civilized human beings in public or they can go the way of the gender ideology degenerates.
Gender ideology and the grooming that spreads it would be a capital offense. The troons and the rest of the freak show perverts wouldn't exist, and there would be measures in place to keep them from reappearing. I can't get too specific here because I get censored whenever I talk about actually solving the troon problem.
At this point I don't think it is possible for most them to keep it to the bedroom. Part of their mental illness is an irresistible compulsion for "sharing" their perversions with people who want nothing to do with it. Also the rate of pedophilia among homos is conservatively estimated to be something like 40x that of the general population.
This.
"do what you want in the bedroom" has always been a lolbertarian cope. It will never stay there.
Yeah that part is negotiable. I guess I just think they should be given a chance to show they can be civilized since I don't think the whole group is irredeemably evil like the troons are.
Which seems to be at least 75% of them if not higher.
I don't think they literally mean keep it in the bedroom.
What they actually mean is don't be obnoxious and/or indoctrinate people.
Nobody cares if they hold hands walking down the street.
You called?
First of all, an ideal society is different to what would actually work, as the shitpost about settling everything with games of Pac-Man demonstrates.
My ideal society...I've tried to be somewhat realistic, so no artificial wombs or insane societal splits.
I would want feminism to be on a similar level to Nazism, with organizations dedicated to stamping it out and regular reminders that it can never happen again. Nuremberg trials for the people who pushed it and a form of Denazification would have a line drawn under it and a chance for women to redeem themselves.
March 8th should be "Day of Rememberance for Victims of Women's Hate" and should be a national holiday, but only for men. For those who are too important to have time off, extra pay is recommended but not forced. Women should have to sit through a long presentation about past evils - think anti-racism, but gendered. TV should be part of this, with documentaries about the hate and evil of feminism aired on major channels on that day. A minute's silence for male suicide victims is observed. Schools observe this day in a less accusatory manner, simply talking about how it is important to care about people and how hateful ideologies can pretend to be good. Think how they currently cover the Holocaust.
Women's other days should be scrapped outright, with the exception of Mother's Day.
Pride month goes on too long. Cut it down to a weekend, extend Memorial Day by a week. This has nothing to do with anti-feminism, I'm just tired of rainbows already.
Transgenderism is banned. It goes down in history as a way for feminist women to push their castration fetish.
Marriage is completely burned to the ground and rebuilt, with alimony scrapped as a relic of when women couldn't work, and all joint asset purchases being split by how much money each party poured into them. Child custody is always 50/50 unless a party submits a private request for lower custody and confirms they are not under duress.
All of the OnlyFans trash are asset stripped. The porn industry is regulated, with a maximum salary and a maximum number of "stars" to prevent every woman jumping on that grift.
The hiring process for companies over a certain size is standardized to hide the gender of the employee until the hire is made.
Judiciary reform will be less dramatic, with monitoring of decisions for anti-male bias and the ability for the men of an area to call for a judge to be removed from their post.
ESG funds are banned. Not sure how exactly I could enforce this without them just playing games with the definition.
Adding to that, funds like Vanguard and Blackrock will have to abstain from voting on shareholder issues. They are merely holding companies, they do not have any interests of their own. Possibly votes could be passed to the actual owners of the ETF, but this might get confusing for ETFs with hundreds of companies in them.
I'm working on the theory that if we drew a line under what happened and built a new society, the corporates would fall in line.
Of course, I'm not sure some of them would, but I'm not willing to advocate government takeovers of private companies to force the narrative.
I'm also working on the theory that treating feminism like Nazism will prevent it coming back. I don't want a one party state like China if it can be avoided. There's a lot of question marks around what I'd like to do, and what certain entities would react with. Even if I could gain power, how long could I hold it, how much would I achieve? How do you reconcile extreme pressure against an ideology with 1st amendment protections?
I'd add a repeal of the 19th Amendment and similar legislation to your list if we're going to be keeping the various government structures overall intact.
I can't believe I forgot that. I was too focused on my train of thought that I forgot the blindingly obvious.
Yes, the 19th and all "sex discrimination" bullshit gets repealed.
Basically the original constitution, but with some reinforcement.
Mandatory gun ownership for citizens.
Politicians are required to be armed, but not allowed to have security.
No gun free zones. All they do is create targets.
No censorship.
Communism is illegal and punishable by the death penalty.
No fault divorce is illegal. Child support is to be capped at a limited amount, and expenses must be approved by both parties, to avoid the money being spent on something other than the child.
Abortion is to be practiced only at a hospital and will have strict requirements for approval. It is not, and should not be, a substitute for birth control.
Affirmative action, and other grievance based policies are illegal.
Any politician who attempts to circumvent the constitution is to be publicly executed.
The only tax allowed is sales tax. None of this property tax bullshit where you "own" property but still have to rent it.
Politicians can serve no more than 2 terms in office, and a total of no more than 10 years in any political office.
Police forces cannot be the recipients of fines that they issue. Furthermore, any damages resulting from lawsuits will come out of their pensions, to be capped at a certain amount.
No restrictions on any of these rights in any state.
All currency used in the country must be backed by gold, or some other real asset. None of this fiat currency crap.
Corporations cannot occupy more than 30% market share in any given market.
Corporations based in the country must have a certain percentage of manufacturing in the country
Politicians cannot accept gifts, donations or any outside money during their term in office. This rule also applies to a period of 10 years before and 20 years after their term ends.
You must be a property owner to vote. People who can just up and leave at a whim should not be entrusted to vote in the interest of their state or country.
You must be a natural born citizen of at least 3 generations in order to vote. Obviously this doesn't apply to the first 3 generations.
Immunity from liability for a corporation knowingly producing a defective product is illegal. No more of this pfizer shit.
10.1 Like double jeopardy, no double taxing the same money.
For example, no income tax, then sales taxing. Or Income taxing then inheritance taxing when it changes hands.
The money is taxed only once at the most relevant applicable rate.
Yes. When changing hands. Don't get me wrong I didn't mean only taxed once ever in its creation.
They shouldn't be allowed for example earlier given, claim income tax on money, then claim inheritance tax when it's changed hands. That money was already taxed, multiple times before it got pooled together as a pot to be inherited. It also has lost value over the years compounding that tax effect to then be taxed again, likely at a greater sum.
Or for example as you said, Employer pays tax when they pay you, you pay tax when you receive it. Then you pay tax again when you buy an item, even tho the manufacturer will have already paid their goods tax for said item.
At present taxing isn't when it changes hands, it's when it changes "form". Their excuse is that it's only ever being taxed once, per person, for that reason. But that means they can claim two sets of tax for one exchange.
See https://www.theolivepress.es/spain-news/2020/03/27/gibraltar-kicks-off-its-double-tax-agreement-with-uk-to-attract-big-money/ for an example.
Yes this is regarding changing countries and being taxed twice but the effect is still the same. What they do there is you are taxed based in the country where the work took place, instead of being taxed in both.
The same could easily be applied to income or money source.
How would you even control this? People naturally gravitate to what is best. You're not going to be able to force people to use LibreOffice over Microsoft Office, for example.
British colonial US. 1700-1750
Low population, a lot of space, mostly independent farms. Few cities to visit once a lifetime just to see whats there.
Everyone has meaningful work to do because survival depends on it. And plenty of places to run off to and start over if a man makes a mistake or is just fed up with his current situation.
Amish but with nicer treatment of animals is another option.
And I don't know of anyone who just "doesn't really like minorities". That is a caricature of "racism" that was been pushed by the subverted media. What people don't like are specific anti-social behaviors that tend to be engaged in by blacks (with consequences for any normal person who points it out) and to a lesser extent hispanics.
I would be fine living in a chinese or even indian majority neighborhood (though it would stink of curry). But not a black or hispanic majority neighborhood.
I lived in an apartment complex that was like half indian.
I swear to god they must have some sort of religious law that says that they must constantly be walking in the street at all hours of the day, and that they must not walk single file because that would be too convenient for anyone in a car to drive around them.
Not only that but they are so needy. Just look at any of them checking out at retail or fast food. They take forever because they want the maximum amount of shit, they don't tip, and their accents are indecipherable half the time.
And as far a jobs go they are super nepotistic. Just like how once women get into HR they try to hire more women, Indians hire more Indians.
Despite all this I would still take them any day over a majority black or Hispanic neighborhood.
My ideal society is an odd one.
1.5) Of course, this means less mandatory education, so the intensity and efficacy of the education that does exist will need to go up.
Harsh punishments for voluntary crimes. Right now in society, involuntary crimes tend to carry very high punishments, while things that people willingly do, and thus are far more likely to do again, are ignored or even tacitly encouraged. Currently, if you forget to file a dividend tax report by a single day, it'll cost you several hundred dollars, even if the report is literally only for one person, yourself, as a solo business owner. But graffitti, which can lower the market value of an entire neighborhood and thus cost MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN DAMAGES (by net worths of the good and honest citizens), is often just let go with a "what scamps!". This should be reversed.
Everyone is fully responsible for everything they do, regardless of mental state. Someone drunkenly flashes a crowd at a sports game? Pedophelia charges, purposeful sex crime charges, the whole book gets thrown at them, no "drunk tank for a day and then release". If you can't control yourself on a substance, don't take it.
No government propaganda on public broadcast.
4.5) Journalists shall be held at least to the standard of a coked-out stock broker. Which is to say, if they're found communicating with others in their field as to what to "sell" to create a beneficial result for themselves, that's some variant of insider trading, and is prison time.
A democracy system will be in place. Voters shall be recognized as those who work earning over any gov't-assistance thresholds, who also live in the area. Welfare is fine to have, safety nets are fine with me, but those footing the bill for it are the ones dictating policy.
Politicians at the end of their service, be it by stepping down, term limit, or outvoted, will be subject to a second vote by the populace, the options being "retirement bonus", "nothing", or "death". Two-thirds majority in any singular category means it happens (or nothing if no dominant vote). "Death" will almost never come up in this system, but the risk must be present to keep them accountable: Only those willing to put their lives on the line for the people, deserve to lead the people.
Adding unrelated amendments to legal or political bills would be forbidden.
A bill's name must accurately reflect the content of the bill to a layperson.
Mandatory "light" military service from ages 18-22. Those in upper education during the service can have a portion of their service be apprenticeship within the service, in example field doctor work for med students. Those unfit to serve are still to do the training and exercises as best they can within their limitations: If you're a gun risk, you still do almost all of Basic. If you're paraplegic you're not doing the marathons, but you're still doing shooting and discipline training. You may offer your body to science instead if you're religiously against even the concept of non-combat military service, and be a lab rat for government-approved research labs.
I think this set of baseline rules would form a society far superior than the current ones around.
Women and cucks will vote to kill everyone who doesn't worship women...
Should that demographic be so large as to make up two-thirds majority (despite anti-propaganda efforts and mandatory military service, alongside the restricted voting meaning that the leech factions would be less likely to be able to vote), then a non-woman-worshipper wouldn't get into power in the first place in order to be killed.
The South without federal taxes.
Probably the British society before the WWI.
Mandatory paternity tests at birth.
End of no-fault-divorce
End of alimony
Loss of custody (and all that comes with that) for spending child support on anything that isn't directly beneficial to the kid
Automatic prison-sentences for proven false accusations. The length is determined by the max length the false accusation could have resulted in.
Voting rights are tied to your contribution and are only granted when you achieved a net-positive in taxes.
I don’t know if people generally have a clear idea of an ideal society, but here’s one ideal that I want to sink in: I don’t bother people when they’re doing their thing, as long as it’s legal, so don’t bother me when I do my thing.
Either everybody is dead except for me or a world where comedy isn't dead and everybody can take a joke and never be offended
Here is a massive parody that summarizes what I want:
Imagine no regressives, it's easy if you try
No freaks lying around us, from nooses they will die
Imagine all the people, living uncanceled, OOH OOH OOH OOH!
Imagine there's no Muslims, it isn't hard to do
No people trying to kill you, and no cultists too
Imagine all the people, living free from death, OOH OOH OOH OOH!
You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us, and the world will be as one!
Imagine no globalists, I wonder if you can
No backroom shady deals, a world free from crime
Imagine all the people, living free from crooks, OOH OOH OOH OOH!
You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us, and the world will be as one!
Vlad the Impaler in charge of Catholic Theocracy.
That or a system where citizens get to determine where their taxes are allocated on tax day instead of voting. This way there be no need for voting and all the political division that comes with it. If you want the government to do something , pay more taxes. If you find something the government does reprehensible, simply allocate your money to other things instead. No one would have to pay for anything they didnt want (though a baseline of taxes would go to whoever ensures the money goes to where it needs to as well as a skeleton military solely for the purpose of defense.)
By god, I just got home as work was awful today, so I'm probably gonna end up doing my own desires tomorrow morning.
This probably deserves a 40 page manifesto to explain perfectly but ill just try to do the abridged version.
TL;DR upfront: all the reforms for all the problems, goals being stability, growth, and elevation of quality of life.
"Intelligence crisis" is a term I coined around 2010, crusius plagiarized stuff I wrote on /pol/ around about 5 years for his manifesto and combined it with violence of tarrant's.
Essentially we are becoming outmoded, eventually machines will be capable of doing everything we do but as that happens the trivial labor, mind numbing, and back breaking labor will be the first to be meaningfully passed to automation. Low skill low mental effort work, high physical demand, and monotonous tasks, these are jobs that the low IQ plebs with low social mobility do currently. Sub 83IQ is essentially unemployable, the military categorizes it as "counter productive", (I know kids today have been taught race and IQ have no correlation but that's a dogmatic lie to hide the blatant reality of decades and decades of testing data)that's half the black population and nearly a third of latinos, that's the current situation, in 10 years sub 95 IQ will be unemployable that's 90%+ of the black population and just over two thirds of latinos and about 30% of whites. IQ isn't completely static education reform and public health reform can mitigate this to a minor degree upfront but the vast majority of people will never move 10 IQ points above their base line even with the best schools and conditions. This means by the year 2030, without reforms, 80-100 million unemployable latinos and 42 million unemployable blacks along with 40 million unemployable we're looking at nearly 2/3rds of america being automated out of work.
Do you know what happened to the domestic horse population after the rise of the automobile? over 90% were liquidated in 15 years, the turnaround cycle from the high income to the low income in new car to used car purchase pipeline. What do you think the rulling class are up to in regards to population control knowing all the above?
You've got the tip of the iceberg of "why" for the difficult things I'm now going to propose.
We must remove the black population in totality, offer a large reparations retirement package to all blacks in the west to surrender all claims to citizenship and go to africa western blacks average 80-85 IQ african blacks average 60-65 IQ, every african country will want our blacks especially when they bring trillions in economic weight, the world will invest in housing and business and expect a new african middle class to rise china will try to snag influence through sending contractors to build housing for 40 million new people, we teach our blacks to protect their money via investment and america will create an international bank to protect the funds of our expatriate blacks in hopes that more leave of their own volition. When few remain we force them to africa take all the boers out by treatise of population exchanges our stake in africa and withhold food while blockading the continent under the pretense of an airborne rabies epidemic, footage of cannibalism and violence will cover the story, we use AI to evaluate the most suitable blacks to hold a colony on an island somewhere to preserve genetic information and depopulate the rest of sub saharan africa.
Its worth mentioning a quirk of genetics, return to the mean, if the smartest black man and the smartest black woman on earth had a baby the bulk of their genetics is still the average gene-code for their race so their children have a relatively high chance of being average IQ for their race this is true of all races and people, eugenics isn't complete from one generation, it takes generations of selective pressure to change an average distribution.
Deport all non white presenting latinos, and tell the white presenting ones to follow their loyalties, they should go back if they want to help those people because the countries we will flood with their own people will be overwhelmed and need new business leaders and innovators and educated workers. Ask white liberals who fancy diversity to do the same. Their economies can survive another 15 years at least after our automation-genesis on standard labor before they need to follow us. How do we get them gone? Gradually, ilegals first, criminal rexords on residents next, we declare that all immigration policy/law set by dems after 2008 is fruit of the poison tree because democrats stole every election from obama on, therefore legal immigrants and citizens must reapply for citizenship and then we expand that poison fruit range gradually untill we declare the 1964 immigration act a violation of our constitution and deport all non whites. Who immigrated in their lifetime and their children. Grandfather 3rd generation immigrants and after but encourage everyone who doesn't want to live in a white ethnostate to remigrate to their genetic homeland or go to South America and help float that civilization.
There is no unique genetic value left in the mongrel soup of south america, it's an ugly mixed pot that more mixing wouldn't hurt, USA and canada may yet be saved that fate. This will seem less cruel when I get to genetic engineering. Sending educated westerners who oppose my reforms to prop up south america is a good punishment for liberals but will help save global markets and food supply in the long run, preventing global collapse.
Offer statehood to canadian provinces so they may benefit from our immigration laws and restore rights of statehood lost in the civil war. This deserves about 5 pages of further explanation, sorry
Education reform, with our 85%+ white society we raise education standards back up, separate the sexes at grade 4, add 2 years to compulsory education, integrate paid internships into late education, require an A and B plan for employment in graduation for all but doctors and and housewives, yes we will make housewife a dedicated B plan in education for girls, it will include business lessons so that they can manage an automation sweatshop in their basement or kitchen and how to sell their products. Along with how to grow food and rear children, boys will get courses on female psychology to help them keep their wives happy. This all deserves ten pages and I'm willing to go into more detail we will encourage traditional morality, intergenerational housing and young marriages in one sense i would kill the modern concept of childhood but would also destroy the boomer/pre-boomer sensibilities about "adult and childish things" these decisions are based on the value of stable family units and the marital success rates for virginity and early marriages, yet again I could write many pages on this. In essence well demand more maturity from youths and less banality from adults, essentially interpreting a traditional society and a return to traditional culture without losing too much of what has been gained and is worth keeping in the misbegotten efforts of progressivism. In other words we will kill whore culture and make romanticism and family life the key societal virtues.
Pursue these policies in other white nations.
Genetic engineering will come but it will be to late to solve the growing pains of the 4th automation revolution, growing pains which could collapse civilization and for which all I have written above is meant for, the racial tilt obviously has my own racial biases in it, I want my people to survive and thrive, obviously, but it is also to avoid mass race war. You see in collapse and liquidation stage of the unaddressed intelligence crisis tribalism will prevail, "diversity is our strength" will have become the poison pill which kills tens of millions in America and leads to open racial conflict and likely targeting of infrastructure that our civilization relies upon to feed itself and survive from the weather. If footage gets out the violence will become global just like the floyd riots. Separation will save us, except africa, eaters and polluters millennia behind genetically can't be saved with so much to lose. This will solve food supply issues brought on by supply chain degradation at the death of globalization under economic strain from automation and the subsequent financial collapse of the lower middle class, giving excess low intelligence whites a task to recolonize africa and giving China a sink for it's excess men will sustain the west and the east and solve food supply issues and allow us in short order to ditch toxic pesticides and herbicides which poison the end consumer. With all the delays we've bought by pushing out hispanics and destroying the blacks we can sustain civilization in the face of collapse long enough to solve our next intelligence crisis by using genetic engineering to raise the public's life span, health-economic efficiency and intelligence, we must have some neuro-diversity to protect the species but we can regulate these things. We should also ban human animal hybridization and splicing, many countries will lose part or all of their racial identity as they pursue western beauty or anime beauty, encourage this in south america, maybe japan and korea should set laws protecting their genetic integrity, western nations if freed from the current enemy will only need mild regulation.
What enemy you ask? It's obvious that we will be opposed by jews at every step of this plan and so we must remove them for most of this to go smoothly. We must convince blacks and latinos to hate them, jews have a vested interest in diversity, if we make it a weakness we can reclaim our stolen autonomy in their confusion. If we don't push them out quickly liquidation will be designed to target whites because they resent us deeply for being their rivals in history, whites will be oppressed more than now, our children will be put on hormones and we will be disarmed, jewish hubris will collapse civilization and start a new dark age. Then they will use genetic engineering, deceit and guilt to make they goyim a slave race to avoid developing robots to do backbreaking labor. If we don't isolate them completely in israel and lock them in they will sabotage the world at every turn. And yes there is more to write here and more context to give but this is already far too long.
As I see it we can collapse and destroy humanity forever or the current system must be reformed to elevate humanity. There is no middle road.
For brevity I left out the section on environmental issues.
There's several scriptures that talk about swords being beaten into plowshares, and I've always liked that idea. I think we are headed to it, but those who have power don't want it to happen. Their entire reason for being in charge is conflict with someone else. Hence Ukraine, men, whites, and others are used as scapegoats for that power.
However, the first real computer was made by the military for military purposes. The computer revolution was started by geeks who had access to a military computer. 3D design for videogames and animation were based on simulation and design programs by the military. Piltowings 64 was made by military contractors who also helped design the Nintendo 64. Motion Capture is talked about being for medical purposes, but it was originally military stuff. The same goes for location based artificial reality games.
One of the biggest charities in the world is the US military. It usually has more people taking care of emergency response needs than sand box shooting. Heck, the majority of people in Iraq and Afghanistan were about rebuilding the infrastructure and society. If you wanted to be an officer, it was required that you help rebuild the area in some way. That's usually where the ambushes were. It's not perfect, but it is a common goal.
I've noticed this slowly building up, the swords being turned into something peaceful, and those who want power trying to stop it. As far as I can tell it's happening. That's what I am waiting for.
Basically, I just want less governing power for the Feds and have it concentrated in local towns instead. Taxes, zoning laws, etc. The fed only exists to run the military and the courts. That would solve like 90% of our problems right now.
Theocracy, in heaven, eternally worshipping and in communion with the Triune God.
I guess I should read those books, because Voluntaryism is my ideal.
How do they handle it if a group of people try to make a competing government?
I think returning to the Articles of Confederation would be a good experiment.