46
Comments (45)
sorted by:
26
Galean 26 points ago +26 / -0

I do not know why but I just can't feel bad for the guys involved. You just know they are miserable, I can't imagine any guy that would be ok with someone else fucking his wife/ girlfriend. But this guys are all leftists, not center left but full blown leftists, they deserve each other.

24
Mpetey123 24 points ago +24 / -0

No the husband is cool he gets to share her life, mortgage, bills, chores etc... and isn't that what's important in a marriage? Sharing all the work while your partner buys a stranger pizza and blows him but alone time can be nice.

14
Galean 14 points ago +15 / -1

You made me think of her blowing some dude and then coming home and kiss the husband. That makes me want to puke.

8
Mpetey123 8 points ago +8 / -0

Apologies clear your mind by thinking of him blowing someone

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Comment Reported for: - NSFW Material

Comment Removed: Rule 5 - Pornography

-18
TheImpossible1 -18 points ago +10 / -28

No the husband is cool he gets to share her life, mortgage, bills, chores etc... and isn't that what's important in a marriage?

Isn't that what the tradcucks believe? As long as the babies are white, I'm sure they won't care about being cucked.

These relationships are just women bringing what they do out into the open. Ask the millions of men who caught their wife cheating, esp. military men, because they're away for a long time with a set time they'll be back, which gives her plenty of time to cover up the affair.

8
BidenLikesMiners 8 points ago +8 / -0
Isn't that what the tradcucks believe? As long as the babies are white, I'm sure they won't care about being cucked.

Where has tradcucks been pro cucking?

-1
TheImpossible1 -1 points ago +3 / -4

The tradcuck right in Europe (specifically Germany and France) banned paternity testing.

7
SemperVenari 7 points ago +7 / -0

It wasn't trad right parties that did that, it was neolibs by and large

2
a_rogue_modron 2 points ago +2 / -0

Never mistake a Neoliberal wearing a red tie for an actual Conservative.

13
Lurker404 13 points ago +13 / -0

they deserve each other.

Plus, less competition on the dating market for sane guys. She took four men out of the dating pool.

8
FuckGenderPolitics [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

Any dude participating in this degeneracy is either a cuck with no other options or sleeping around himself. The former was never any competition at all and the latter is still competition. This does nothing to improve the dating market. It just encourages women to be even more degenerate than they already are when they see other women getting multiple betas to pay their bills without having to leave the cock carousel.

1
Lurker404 1 point ago +1 / -0

Looking at these fools it's definitely the former. That's why they settled for a crazy chick with tats that sleeps around (just noticed she has a cat, and one of those naked ones at that, she is most definitely certifiably batshit crazy).

If they had other options they wouldn't be in this "relationship". If they weren't in this "relationship" they might consider finding a real one, or worse, improve themselves. This relationship is the equivalent of having given up.

4
TheImpossible1 4 points ago +8 / -4

Because deep down you know they're broken products of the feminist schools and culture that never stood a chance against the machine that seeks their enslavement.

16
Galean 16 points ago +16 / -0

They are leftists, they are broken but at the same time they think themselves superior, because nothing says superior like someone else fucking your wife. I honestly think that something very, very wrong happened in human evolution, specifically men.
I'm more on the reserved side of conspiracy theories but I can't believe that this level of soy can be natural, I'm thinking chemical.

I'm, more and more thinking that we need natural selection. As a species we had way to many wars, a lot of brave blood lines ended and now we are left with way to many cowards and low T men.

If we are to have another world war then we are screwed.

-3
TheImpossible1 -3 points ago +7 / -10

can't believe that this level of soy can be natural, I'm thinking chemical.

I think it's just the result of operant conditioning (finally remembered the name) from a young age to be this way, led by the schools and culture.

If we are to have another world war then we are screwed.

If we do, I'll fight to my last cent to get them drafted into it.

9
MargarineMongoose 9 points ago +11 / -2

If we do, I'll fight to my last cent to get them drafted into it.

Why? They'd just suck up resources going through training and then all get knocked up when it comes time to do any actual fighting. Your fantasy of seeing them all bleed out on some battlefield will never be realized even if every single woman got drafted.

1
Galean 1 point ago +1 / -0

Women will not fight, there are going to be like less then 0.1% of soldiers but they will pretend they saved the day.

18
FuckGenderPolitics [S] 18 points ago +18 / -0

The article doesn't outright say that the dude isn't seeing other women, but the silence on that point is deafening. It even mentions that he has "pangs" of jealousy. Put more explicitly: he realizes on an instinctual level that there's something deeply fucked up about the situation he's in, but he's a beta cuck who's deeply scared of losing his relationship with his whore wife, and getting ass raped in divorce court is another determent to leaving this thot.

As a side note look up "one penis policy' to see this situation with the genders reversed. I don't think anyone here will be surprised to learn that these degenerates look way less kindly on the kind of polyamory where the dude sleeps around and the woman doesn't.

19
Lurker404 19 points ago +19 / -0

If Jonathan meets someone else, I know he isn’t going to leave me

This tells me she's the only one whoring around.

7
TheImpossible1 7 points ago +13 / -6

I can almost hear the mocking tone in that if, and I'm just reading you quoting it.

18
Lurker404 18 points ago +18 / -0

Whaaaat? A 42 year old philosophy prof with purple hair and an uber beta personality is such a catch! I bet he's swimming in booty!

You just know that if by chance he manages to hook one of his 20 year old students with daddy issues she'd immediately change her tune: "This is not what we agreed to!", "This is different!", "You are ruining our relationship!" :D

5
evilplushie 5 points ago +5 / -0

Its a tale as old as time

13
current_horror 13 points ago +13 / -0

So I did look up OPP and happened upon this gem from Psychology Today:

The OPP can be an explicit rule that clearly states “No other men!” or an implicit policy enforced through freaking out only when the female partner dates a man but absent when she is dating women or transfolks.

Imagine thinking that there exists a man who would object to his wife fucking other men but not other men pretending to be women.

8
FuckGenderPolitics [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

freaking out only when the female partner dates a man but absent when she is dating women or transfolks

The tranny part of their definition is incorrect, which is to be expected from the retards at Psychology Today. The name should make it obvious but it includes anyone with a penis, and that includes MtF trannies. That's actually one of the reasons they object to OPP. They say it's transphobic because it excludes trannies from the lesbian relationships it allows. Like everything else the trannies managed to make it all about themselves.

2
Shill4Hire 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, it's letting women fuck only Vaginad Entities, regardless of their "gender identity".

Some weird combination of soyleft and trad harem.

9
FrostedCricketFlakes 9 points ago +9 / -0

People that don't want the responsibility that comes from a committed relationship, and people that are too submissive and deluded to stand up for themselves

9
Adamrises 9 points ago +9 / -0

They'd get a lot further with their poly pushing if it was ever not the same "woman with 3-4 boys" setup. But then, if they saw a guy with multiple girls they would call it an evil harem of enslaving women and hound them like they do the Mormons. Despite that setup being not only more natural, but much more historically supported.

Especially as it has an actual logical purpose. Nearly all those "womanly roles" are time consuming or difficult when tackled all at once in bustling families, which is why having wives to move around that and give breaks or more suited roles to would create far more effective households. Not a problem with our 0-1 baby culture, but if you want a big family it becomes quite troublesome.

Whereas the polyandry setup is always just about sex or shirking duties completely. No logic, actual hedonism and laziness.

5
FuckGenderPolitics [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

You're correct that polygyny works better, but it has problems of its own. The main one is that it creates a lot of leftover men who have no stake in society and wouldn't piss on the beneficiaries of the system if they were on fire. That's really not good for building/maintaining a civilization. Monogamy is the norm because it works. Our society is collapsing largely because we're reverting to polygyny in practice if not in theory. You can't maintain a society if you punish the people who keep it running.

3
Adamrises 3 points ago +3 / -0

Right, in terms of greater society it fell away for a reason. However on individual levels it has far more going for it beyond just sex like polyandry does. You can actually sell its benefits to both genders without having to overcome biological instincts, as women's jealousy is far less of a dominant force.

Point being not that it is a goal to work towards, but that it is a better step out of monogamy if that was their goal. And that in avoiding it entirely, betrays their actual goals.

2
MegoThor 2 points ago +2 / -0

There’s also the fact that women can’t get along. Why someone would want more than one wife if beyond me.

8
subbookkeeper 8 points ago +8 / -0

There is a reason there are no, or very very few attractive people in poly relationships.

It's a case of the guy taking what he can get because he has no other options.

Every photo of these articles is the same. Beaming Woman surrounded by 2 (or more) overweight neckbeard men.

8
AnotherSchwarzesMark 8 points ago +8 / -0

I would rather work on myself or become a monk than to share a gf/wife. Shit is disgusting and people who go through with this are mentally not there.

3
Assassin47 3 points ago +3 / -0

I see plenty of these cases with megawhales surrounded by either beta men or Black losers.

7
TheImpossible1 7 points ago +13 / -6

They want to maximize their grift, just got to break enough men into accepting it.

Why fake a relationship with a man you hate and hide that you cheat, when you can openly cheat and call it a relationship?

Empathy? Kindness? Basic humanity? Those are just tools of the patriarchy!

10
FuckGenderPolitics [S] 10 points ago +10 / -0

Why fake a relationship with a man you hate and hide that you cheat, when you can openly cheat and call it a relationship?

It's the purest form of AFBB that exists. She collects betas to fund her lifestyle while she fucks Chad without having to go through the inconvenience of hiding it. It's female hypergamy taken to its logical conclusion.

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's a perversion of hypergamy.

The whole point of filtering out mates under your level is that the mate would be able to at least maintain you at in a lifestyle you're comfortable with. The reason that this is ubiquitous is because women are supposed to bear and care for kids and will thus be indisposed for a significant portion of their adult life, needing to be taken care of.

If women aren't having kids, with a single man, then there's no reason to take care of her, period, let alone sacrifice for her.

Men have been conditioned into thinking they want sex (by someone) instead of understanding that they want kids, a legacy, and sex is just an extension of that.q

5
Grumman 5 points ago +5 / -0

If a healthy polyamorous relationship can exist, it doesn't look like this.

In addition to Ichikawa, she’s with Tyler, Robin and Kupcha. For six years, she had a close relationship with Ray, a poet. But they broke up in 2019, after Ray found another partner. Ray’s new set-up was less open, she explains. Jenkins was heartbroken. Her husband – the person ‘I always turn to for support for anything’ – was sympathetic. ‘That could sound strange – shouldn’t he be glad I lost this person? But it’s not like that. This person wasn’t competition. He was someone else I cared for, someone else who was supporting me, and actually it’s a loss to us all if I lose that. But obviously, I was the only one heartbroken.’

If by some improbable turn of events she had found five men who all love her and share at least a brotherly love for one another, maybe she'd be the once-in-a-blue-moon polyamorous relationship that works. But Ray is proof that she's sleeping around with men who don't just mean nothing to her other partners, but don't even care much about her.

5
useruser123 5 points ago +5 / -0

She's got loads of partners. He's home doing the washing Women still most oppressed: "’ In fact, although Ichikawa is dating, he doesn’t have another partner, simply because of the lack of polyamorous women. The imbalance is common, says Jenkins. The **stigma and judgment for women, in particular, is a big downside. **"

4
evilplushie 4 points ago +4 / -0

Beta cucks

2
BidenLikesMiners 2 points ago +2 / -0

3 lovers

cat looks ashamed

...holy shee, fuckin lib'rals

2
yvaN_ehT_nioJ 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cuckoldry with extra steps if it's a woman with a bunch of men. A tremendous hassle if it's a man with a bunch of women. One is already a lot of work but two or three? Good lord. And remember, this is a world where men see prostitutes because they leave when you pay them!

4
FuckGenderPolitics [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

In the multiple women scenario the women fight over who has to be the cleaning lady and do all the bitch work around the house. It can work if the dude is alpha enough to keep maintain control of the household.

It's the multiple men scenario that's never stable. The woman treats the men like her children and there are constant cuck fights. The dudes often murder each other or any children that result from the arrangement. It's just not a workable relationship structure even ignoring the fact there's nothing in it for the men besides sloppy fourths when and if she feels like it.

1
Kienan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yikes. Start by imagining getting cucked. Then imagine getting cucked by that.