we find that Sabatini’s propensity to praise or gravitate toward those in the lab that mirror his desired personality traits, scientific success, or view of ‘science above all else,’ creates additional obstacles for female lab members
'We find that this guy was serious about getting results on a literal matter of life and death for untold millions upon millions of people, and we think it's far more important that some 24 year old girl not get her feelings hurt.'
If you’re not marrying & having babies you’re not helping our side. You’re just engaging in self serving hedonism. You use examples like this article to not even try.
There are plenty of ways you can fight against the annihilation of Western people's without having kids.
And marrying and having kids does not necessarily help; the entire system is designed to non stop indoctrinate and manipulate kids. There's only so much the average parent can do against such advanced societal brainwashing.
There are plenty of ways you can fight back, but all of them end with you. This battle won't end in a generation, it probably won't in several short of nuclear holocaust. And all the while, the other side has its negros and latinx and muslims outnumbering you more and more by the day.
A lack of "perfect" option doesn't make all others worthless.
Look, I'd honestly rather nuke large swathes of the surface of the globe then have kids, so if you're gonna push me into an either/or, I'll do my part, but not everyone will like it.
There was no either or. It was simple stating that in doing so you are massively limiting your effects because you have a limited lifespan and very few of us will have a "legacy" outside our small units.
The fact that you took it as an either or, betrays how blinded by your convictions you are.
Not only that - having kids effectively gives the state massive leverage over you to enforce whatever they want. If you have kids and no job, good luck to you. Mr Goverment says, "So, naturally, you need to take this injection, right? Otherwise you lose your job and your kids starve. Oh, glad you are 'willingly' taking it. It's not like you can fight me, after all, your kids might get harmed and it'll be all your fault!"
No kids and no job? Whatever, no need to sacrifice my principles for you.
That quoted line is so amazingly belittling to women, and they printed it without a second thought.
"Yeah, he wasn't discriminating at all, but... he looked for logical analysis, success, and focus on work. Which, obviously, meant women were utterly incapable of being there, because seeking success, logic, and work-focus? With women? Am I right or am I right?"
And yet somehow that report isn't chucked into a recycle bin. They cared far more about tearing down a successful man than bolstering their own camp. It is about destruction, not takeover.
Bari Weiss and others (Katie Herzog being one) are doing some great work, exposing the incestuous and corrupt inner workings of academia.
Bottom line for any male is don't engage, mentor, or take on any female subordinates, and if you must, never be alone (Pence rule), and record everything.
Yep. A lesson men have to learn is to keep it in their pants. Far too many men seem to think that sexual liberation was a boon for men. Sure, it has some benefits for some men, but it also has normalised sex as an obsession for men - how many men see their "notch count" as some kind of measure of success? This isn't success, it's just an indication of how much power men have willingly given to their sexual urges, and by implication, those they keep trying to bed.
Nah. Even without a sexual harassment case, sex can cause emotions to run hot for both women and men. That it turn can absolutely fuck with your mind and life.
Plus women, in general, are absolute experts are using sex to control men, and have been since forever.
Same story, for eons. Nothing new here. Except men these days seem to think they are so much cleverer than all the men that came before them, and reject all their teachings. Funny that.
It's weird talking to my colleagues about this. So many think that he must have clearly been in the wrong, they support this culture and assume that this sort of thing can't happen to them, all while engaging in very similar behavior.
'We find that this guy was serious about getting results on a literal matter of life and death for untold millions upon millions of people, and we think it's far more important that some 24 year old girl not get her feelings hurt.'
It's always the girl who wants to "keep it casual" that ends up jealous and attached.
This whole thing sounds like the script from a B-Tier Fatal Attraction knockoff film.
Well said!
I became MGTOW after personally seeing the state of women these days.
I vehemently disagree with tradcons on dating/marriage.
It is clear to me that the costs of dating/marriage vastly outweigh the benefits for men these days.
Everyone is certainly free to make their own choices but watch out!
One must be careful when interacting with women.
When you carelessly play with fire, you are going to get burned!
If you’re not marrying & having babies you’re not helping our side. You’re just engaging in self serving hedonism. You use examples like this article to not even try.
The sane one.
There are plenty of ways you can fight against the annihilation of Western people's without having kids.
And marrying and having kids does not necessarily help; the entire system is designed to non stop indoctrinate and manipulate kids. There's only so much the average parent can do against such advanced societal brainwashing.
There are plenty of ways you can fight back, but all of them end with you. This battle won't end in a generation, it probably won't in several short of nuclear holocaust. And all the while, the other side has its negros and latinx and muslims outnumbering you more and more by the day.
A lack of "perfect" option doesn't make all others worthless.
So...nuclear holocaust it is.
Look, I'd honestly rather nuke large swathes of the surface of the globe then have kids, so if you're gonna push me into an either/or, I'll do my part, but not everyone will like it.
There was no either or. It was simple stating that in doing so you are massively limiting your effects because you have a limited lifespan and very few of us will have a "legacy" outside our small units.
The fact that you took it as an either or, betrays how blinded by your convictions you are.
Not only that - having kids effectively gives the state massive leverage over you to enforce whatever they want. If you have kids and no job, good luck to you. Mr Goverment says, "So, naturally, you need to take this injection, right? Otherwise you lose your job and your kids starve. Oh, glad you are 'willingly' taking it. It's not like you can fight me, after all, your kids might get harmed and it'll be all your fault!"
No kids and no job? Whatever, no need to sacrifice my principles for you.
I am Asian American. My MGTOW lifestyle doesn't impact the White birth rates that I assume you want to boost.
That’s is true. There are plenty of you.
He's Asian, not white. Let him be. LOL
Point taken.
That quoted line is so amazingly belittling to women, and they printed it without a second thought.
"Yeah, he wasn't discriminating at all, but... he looked for logical analysis, success, and focus on work. Which, obviously, meant women were utterly incapable of being there, because seeking success, logic, and work-focus? With women? Am I right or am I right?"
And yet somehow that report isn't chucked into a recycle bin. They cared far more about tearing down a successful man than bolstering their own camp. It is about destruction, not takeover.
Bari Weiss and others (Katie Herzog being one) are doing some great work, exposing the incestuous and corrupt inner workings of academia.
Bottom line for any male is don't engage, mentor, or take on any female subordinates, and if you must, never be alone (Pence rule), and record everything.
MGTOW could have saved a great man, or at the very least given him some modicum of awareness of the gynocracy and its destructive nature.
Those who do not understand these obvious truths are just blind sitting ducks.
Simply being attractive to women is now considered abuse.
Yep. A lesson men have to learn is to keep it in their pants. Far too many men seem to think that sexual liberation was a boon for men. Sure, it has some benefits for some men, but it also has normalised sex as an obsession for men - how many men see their "notch count" as some kind of measure of success? This isn't success, it's just an indication of how much power men have willingly given to their sexual urges, and by implication, those they keep trying to bed.
It was a boon for them until sexual harassment suits became routine & not the exception.
Nah. Even without a sexual harassment case, sex can cause emotions to run hot for both women and men. That it turn can absolutely fuck with your mind and life.
Plus women, in general, are absolute experts are using sex to control men, and have been since forever.
Same story, for eons. Nothing new here. Except men these days seem to think they are so much cleverer than all the men that came before them, and reject all their teachings. Funny that.
It's weird talking to my colleagues about this. So many think that he must have clearly been in the wrong, they support this culture and assume that this sort of thing can't happen to them, all while engaging in very similar behavior.
Most people are cowards who enable evil because its the easier path.
I wonder why the ancients didnt allow women to testify?
Women are such fucking children
Pence was right?
Military, video game companies, cancer research teams... its like they expect only men be responsibile for everything.
"Holy shit, cancer can be cured by Ivermec..."
BLAM!