If it wasn’t, there’d be no societies. Or most species.
It’s cool if some dude wants a dick in his butt, but that dick’s very clearly not meant to go in there. We would literally all be dead if that’s where it went.
It’d be funny to see one of them put their dick in a girl’s butt and see if they liked it better or worse. Plenty of people probably are born gay, but based on knowing so many in the Bay, seems like a lot of them did mostly have some weird childhood experience with someone older usually that ushered them into going down that route. Most gay guys and girls I know have a story like that, including some in my family. Plenty of them actually think that might be why they went gay. Your inaugural sexual experiences ended up being with the same sex so those associations build at a rapid rate when you’re young.
Disgusting to say, but if some guy wanked off a bunch of little boys, I can see why they’d grow up to like men since to them that’s where orgasms come from. I’m straight and came to like girls that resembled other girls I’d been with and probably wouldn’t have liked those sorts of girls if I didn’t have those experiences. Seems similar, only in their case, something went dementedly wrong.
Also think some dykes are just afraid of commitment and relationships because I’ve had sex with lesbians that mostly seem afraid of the responsibility part of relationships. Plenty might be born just liking girls, but I’ve known plenty that even themselves would say maybe they weren’t.
Also, testosterone levels in the womb (for both sexes, but particularly lesbians) say hi... :-/ You're not wrong, but let's not pretend that doesn't play a part/role, here...
How fast did we go from born this way to your kids are straight because it is the societal norm.
If we are born this way then it should not matter if we want to protect little kids from gender ideology and LGBTQPAI2S+
If we are not born this way then it is my duty as a parent to make the best choice for my kids, it's not the states choice and is not the teacher choice and If I have a choice I would chose that my kids to be straight. I'm not a homophobe mind you but I want grandkids some day and strong family values leads to a healthier and happier life.
While I have doubts that you can groom kids in to being gay, at least not easily, I do think you can groom kids in the new trans ideology. This requires only that the kid is confused and impressionable. Is no wonder they want to get to kids before puberty or early in to puberty. The entire thing is evil.
I get you. You know where I stand as a Christian on that but I try to show compassion to everyone and if someone is gay I won’t harass them or preach to them unless they want to have a biblical discussion. The trans thing is just so crazy and I do wonder what percentage of young ppl say they are bi or gay because it’s trendy
I’ve seen or heard of quite a few women who say they are lesbian or bi when they are young and then meet a guy and have kids and are still married to men.
That is the norm, I suspect, Inshallah (obviously I mean the use of that word ironically, just to be clear)...
Or, at least, is the case in like... Probably the majority of "young bisexuals" and the like, lol...
There's a reason the "lesbian in college" stereotype exists, and is so prevalent, lol. It is very much at least partially based in fact, no matter how much the Alphabet Lobby might deny that fact, lol...
And I've met a couple of girls like you describe, so the anecdotal experience carries over, there, too, lol...
, I do think you can groom kids in the new trans ideology.
Absolutely the case. It is the motivation behind the tranny lobby's efforts to confound our understanding of sex, one half of their two-pronged strategy to destroy the nuclear family. The other half of their strategy is their victim rhetoric, calling opposition to their grooming (indoctrinating children into believing their nonsense about "gender") an "existential threat." They capitalize on an adolescent's emerging sexuality and the anxiety this causes, and they capitalize on the naivete of pre-adolescents. They also offer a club for alienated youth to join.
Heterosexuality is the norm throughout all life that evolved to be sexually dimorphic. Anything outside of that norm is an aberation and a genetic dead end, which logically means that it's wrong, everyone should criticize it, be disgusted by it, and avoid it, as a means to protect themselves, their loved ones, their community, and species.
I went to a school where I didn't know whether my teachers were single or married, what their sexuality was, or what they had in their pants. Because it had nothing to do with what I was supposed to be learning. Math, science, history, english. Not a single one of those subjects require I know I damn thing about my teacher's personal life.
I did know my geography teacher was a god damn communist though, because he refused to shut the hell up about that nonsense. It didn't have anything to do with geography, in any case, so I wish I hadn't been forced to know about his political perversions either.
In all my years of schooling, the first time I remember hearing a teacher bring up their spouse was in college. Before that, zero mention. You could infer it, from the fact that some of them were "Mrs" rather than "Ms", or because they got pregnant, but that's about it. None of them ever felt the need to let me know that they were married. Because I was their student, not their friend. The classroom is not the place to bring up your personal life for any reason.
If my class had time for the teacher to wax on about personal relations, they would have spent it either teaching lessons, or sneaking off and giving the class "sellf-study" while they took a bonus break.
And the only political belief that came forward was my philosophy and economics teacher was an avowed ancap. Went on rants frequently about how the students were wasting their lives in school learning worthless things like philosophy when they could be starting businesses, and the like.
Sometimes teachers would mention their wife (or vice versa) but I never heard any of them mentioning a thing about their sexuality. These people are heckin wierdos.
I don't know him well enough to know where he went to school, but I do know that much...
Schooling isn't... Necessarily exactly the same here as it is elsewhere, including the US, especially as he likely went to a private school. It's just... Worth mentioning that much, let's say.
I went to a school where we almost entirely called teachers by their first name, from high school onwards (junior high, in the US). While this... Was unusual, even here, it wasn't... That odd.
There's just... A difference in how things work here. Especially in private schools. I'm not saying whether that's a good or a bad thing, but it is, simply, a fact...
we almost entirely called teachers by their first name
Fascinating.
In my high school in England, teacher's first names were pretty much guarded secrets.
They would always refer to eachother by title and surname. If one of them accidentally addressed another by their first name, that would have been seen as an embarrassing fuckup for both of them.
Being an flaming faggot has been a thing since before books existed. Most decaying civilizations end up with these type of people fanning the flames. They're a sign of disease like maggots are.
The lesson was young love can be difficult and you shouldn't make rash decisions you can't take back. Romeo killed himself because Juliet pretended she had.
Actually, I think it was more Shakespeare's response to the new and novel idea of marrying for love, rather than for money and connections (at least as far as the upper classes were concerned.) Shakespeare seems to have been a conservative, and Romeo and Juliet says that letting young people do their own choosing is a bad idea, because young people are idiots.
I mean, I think failing to mention intergenerational familial feuds being stupid is probably an important omission, there...
He wasn't exactly GLOWING about the merits of that stupid grudge...
Did he think they were naïve..? Probably. Did he think the familial feud was a massive part of the whole debacle, and that the two families hopefully learned something as a result?? Fucking hell yes he did.
Shakespeare wasn't exactly a conservative, bruh. Just look at fucking Twelfth Night, or Merchant.... He just lived in "Interesting times", shall we say...
Well, the "falling in love with the scion of the family you are feuding with" just underscores how bad young-person judgement is, and is why they should continue to be auctioned off to the highest bidder, like the cattle they are.
Not really, because I think the background of being written during a cultural shift is very important to the story, even though it's not outright stated that a cultural revolution is happening at the time.
Teachers shouldn't even be talking about their heterosexuality. Family life is fine at a certain point, like a high school teacher talking about going to the movies or what they had for supper, but sexuality is a no go.
Consider the following two raps you might hear in a 2nd-grade classroom:
"Yes, kids, since you asked, I'm happily married and love my wife, have two great kids. Here's this week's reading, Laura Ingalls Wilder's 'Little House on the Prairie.'"
"We will continue our reading of 'Pink Blue and Purple' after I tell you how my pregnant boyfriend is doing this week."
Heterosexuality is the norm. Homosexuality is not. Transsexuality is the symptom of a mental illness. Toleration is not advocacy.
Fucking horse shit. Not a single teacher I had ever once went into their personal life. Hell, I never learned most of their first fucking names. The only time a teacher became controversial was when they became well known for being a stick asshole. Weirdly though, everyone that had said teachers always looked back at them most fondly. I managed to dodge all those types of teachers, but it was a weirdly consistent phenomenon.
I unironically know this person in real life (yes, yes, small world...). Was always a woke retard. Worked for Amnesty (where I must have met him. I used to be heavily involved in that) and the Art Gallery of NSW (state funded - of course...).
He ("it") fled the country a few years back. We're probably still "Facebook friends" on my old account, but frankly I do not care enough to check, lol...
Such an idiotic take. Also remember that heterosexuality is the norm in society
If it wasn’t, there’d be no societies. Or most species.
It’s cool if some dude wants a dick in his butt, but that dick’s very clearly not meant to go in there. We would literally all be dead if that’s where it went.
It’d be funny to see one of them put their dick in a girl’s butt and see if they liked it better or worse. Plenty of people probably are born gay, but based on knowing so many in the Bay, seems like a lot of them did mostly have some weird childhood experience with someone older usually that ushered them into going down that route. Most gay guys and girls I know have a story like that, including some in my family. Plenty of them actually think that might be why they went gay. Your inaugural sexual experiences ended up being with the same sex so those associations build at a rapid rate when you’re young.
Disgusting to say, but if some guy wanked off a bunch of little boys, I can see why they’d grow up to like men since to them that’s where orgasms come from. I’m straight and came to like girls that resembled other girls I’d been with and probably wouldn’t have liked those sorts of girls if I didn’t have those experiences. Seems similar, only in their case, something went dementedly wrong.
Also think some dykes are just afraid of commitment and relationships because I’ve had sex with lesbians that mostly seem afraid of the responsibility part of relationships. Plenty might be born just liking girls, but I’ve known plenty that even themselves would say maybe they weren’t.
cough The priesthood cough...
Unfortunately...
Also, testosterone levels in the womb (for both sexes, but particularly lesbians) say hi... :-/ You're not wrong, but let's not pretend that doesn't play a part/role, here...
teachers apparently molest kids at higher rates than priests
most of the priests you refer to hardly adhere to their religion to begin with
and i know of another religion that considers giving newborn babies bloody blowjobs sacred
it ain't Christianity friend
People deserve what they tolerate.
They are being honest about what they want. Attention.
How fast did we go from born this way to your kids are straight because it is the societal norm.
If we are born this way then it should not matter if we want to protect little kids from gender ideology and LGBTQPAI2S+
If we are not born this way then it is my duty as a parent to make the best choice for my kids, it's not the states choice and is not the teacher choice and If I have a choice I would chose that my kids to be straight. I'm not a homophobe mind you but I want grandkids some day and strong family values leads to a healthier and happier life.
While I have doubts that you can groom kids in to being gay, at least not easily, I do think you can groom kids in the new trans ideology. This requires only that the kid is confused and impressionable. Is no wonder they want to get to kids before puberty or early in to puberty. The entire thing is evil.
I get you. You know where I stand as a Christian on that but I try to show compassion to everyone and if someone is gay I won’t harass them or preach to them unless they want to have a biblical discussion. The trans thing is just so crazy and I do wonder what percentage of young ppl say they are bi or gay because it’s trendy
Honestly... I'm gonna go with more than 50%, especially for "bi", these days... Probably more than 80%, in the under-35 set, unfortunately...
I’ve seen or heard of quite a few women who say they are lesbian or bi when they are young and then meet a guy and have kids and are still married to men.
That is the norm, I suspect, Inshallah (obviously I mean the use of that word ironically, just to be clear)...
Or, at least, is the case in like... Probably the majority of "young bisexuals" and the like, lol...
There's a reason the "lesbian in college" stereotype exists, and is so prevalent, lol. It is very much at least partially based in fact, no matter how much the Alphabet Lobby might deny that fact, lol...
And I've met a couple of girls like you describe, so the anecdotal experience carries over, there, too, lol...
Absolutely the case. It is the motivation behind the tranny lobby's efforts to confound our understanding of sex, one half of their two-pronged strategy to destroy the nuclear family. The other half of their strategy is their victim rhetoric, calling opposition to their grooming (indoctrinating children into believing their nonsense about "gender") an "existential threat." They capitalize on an adolescent's emerging sexuality and the anxiety this causes, and they capitalize on the naivete of pre-adolescents. They also offer a club for alienated youth to join.
Heterosexuality is the norm throughout all life that evolved to be sexually dimorphic. Anything outside of that norm is an aberation and a genetic dead end, which logically means that it's wrong, everyone should criticize it, be disgusted by it, and avoid it, as a means to protect themselves, their loved ones, their community, and species.
I went to a school where I didn't know whether my teachers were single or married, what their sexuality was, or what they had in their pants. Because it had nothing to do with what I was supposed to be learning. Math, science, history, english. Not a single one of those subjects require I know I damn thing about my teacher's personal life.
I did know my geography teacher was a god damn communist though, because he refused to shut the hell up about that nonsense. It didn't have anything to do with geography, in any case, so I wish I hadn't been forced to know about his political perversions either.
In all my years of schooling, the first time I remember hearing a teacher bring up their spouse was in college. Before that, zero mention. You could infer it, from the fact that some of them were "Mrs" rather than "Ms", or because they got pregnant, but that's about it. None of them ever felt the need to let me know that they were married. Because I was their student, not their friend. The classroom is not the place to bring up your personal life for any reason.
If my class had time for the teacher to wax on about personal relations, they would have spent it either teaching lessons, or sneaking off and giving the class "sellf-study" while they took a bonus break.
And the only political belief that came forward was my philosophy and economics teacher was an avowed ancap. Went on rants frequently about how the students were wasting their lives in school learning worthless things like philosophy when they could be starting businesses, and the like.
Sometimes teachers would mention their wife (or vice versa) but I never heard any of them mentioning a thing about their sexuality. These people are heckin wierdos.
Really. When did all this nauseating chit chat about teachers' home lives become common?
My experience as well. Two of my teachers were married and I only found out at reunion years later.
No, you were groomed into homosexuality.
You can't be groomed into what you naturally are, you can only be groomed out of it.
Mine didn't.
I knew absolutely nothing about my teachers' personal lives.
I believe Sen grew up in Australia...
I don't know him well enough to know where he went to school, but I do know that much...
Schooling isn't... Necessarily exactly the same here as it is elsewhere, including the US, especially as he likely went to a private school. It's just... Worth mentioning that much, let's say.
I went to a school where we almost entirely called teachers by their first name, from high school onwards (junior high, in the US). While this... Was unusual, even here, it wasn't... That odd.
There's just... A difference in how things work here. Especially in private schools. I'm not saying whether that's a good or a bad thing, but it is, simply, a fact...
Fascinating.
In my high school in England, teacher's first names were pretty much guarded secrets.
They would always refer to eachother by title and surname. If one of them accidentally addressed another by their first name, that would have been seen as an embarrassing fuckup for both of them.
Literally exactly the opposite then...
Interesting that.
I suppose what you speak of still exists in some private schools in Aus, but really not many...
That level of... Formality would be seen as quite unusual, in most circumstances in Australia, including schools... shrug
Let me guess . . . you were in primary school in the '80s or '90s, if not later. All this touchy-feely bullshit was hatched in the late '70s.
Bro, most kids grow up thinking their teachers live at the school.
He grew up in Aus, and lives in the UK. Not defending him, but he's like... Second-generation immigrant. Hence the wokeness...
So he's just admitting straight ppl rarely groom unlike lgbt
Being an flaming faggot has been a thing since before books existed. Most decaying civilizations end up with these type of people fanning the flames. They're a sign of disease like maggots are.
Isn't the lesson in Romeo And Juliet that it sucks being straight? If Romeo just liked Tibalt, the whole thing would have been resolved in Act 1.
The lesson was young love can be difficult and you shouldn't make rash decisions you can't take back. Romeo killed himself because Juliet pretended she had.
Actually, I think it was more Shakespeare's response to the new and novel idea of marrying for love, rather than for money and connections (at least as far as the upper classes were concerned.) Shakespeare seems to have been a conservative, and Romeo and Juliet says that letting young people do their own choosing is a bad idea, because young people are idiots.
I mean, I think failing to mention intergenerational familial feuds being stupid is probably an important omission, there...
He wasn't exactly GLOWING about the merits of that stupid grudge...
Did he think they were naïve..? Probably. Did he think the familial feud was a massive part of the whole debacle, and that the two families hopefully learned something as a result?? Fucking hell yes he did.
Shakespeare wasn't exactly a conservative, bruh. Just look at fucking Twelfth Night, or Merchant.... He just lived in "Interesting times", shall we say...
Well, the "falling in love with the scion of the family you are feuding with" just underscores how bad young-person judgement is, and is why they should continue to be auctioned off to the highest bidder, like the cattle they are.
Well that's certainly one (humorous, I hope?) interpretation of events, sure...
But I really, really, really doubt that is how Shakespeare intended it to be interpreted, lol...
Literally several hundred years of scholarship, and my own decently extensive reading, suggests, uhh, a slightly different interpretation, lol...
But that's cool. It's fiction. You can read into it what you want, I suppose... shrug
you just wrote what I did in more words.
Not really, because I think the background of being written during a cultural shift is very important to the story, even though it's not outright stated that a cultural revolution is happening at the time.
When I was in school, teachers didn't talk about their home lives at all. Ever. And the students didn't want them too.
That just... Doesn't seem to be the case, mostly, in Australia...
Not for some time. At least in my experience. And perhaps the guy being quoted here.
I had only one teacher who ever talked about her heterosexual relationships and she was an absolutely insufferable feminist liberal.
Thankfully I didnt have a single open faggot teacher.
Does this fucking idiot think people are born gay?
Teachers shouldn't even be talking about their heterosexuality. Family life is fine at a certain point, like a high school teacher talking about going to the movies or what they had for supper, but sexuality is a no go.
Consider the following two raps you might hear in a 2nd-grade classroom:
"Yes, kids, since you asked, I'm happily married and love my wife, have two great kids. Here's this week's reading, Laura Ingalls Wilder's 'Little House on the Prairie.'"
"We will continue our reading of 'Pink Blue and Purple' after I tell you how my pregnant boyfriend is doing this week."
Heterosexuality is the norm. Homosexuality is not. Transsexuality is the symptom of a mental illness. Toleration is not advocacy.
I wish these people would groom themselves into trying to mouth fuck an alligator
Fucking horse shit. Not a single teacher I had ever once went into their personal life. Hell, I never learned most of their first fucking names. The only time a teacher became controversial was when they became well known for being a stick asshole. Weirdly though, everyone that had said teachers always looked back at them most fondly. I managed to dodge all those types of teachers, but it was a weirdly consistent phenomenon.
I unironically know this person in real life (yes, yes, small world...). Was always a woke retard. Worked for Amnesty (where I must have met him. I used to be heavily involved in that) and the Art Gallery of NSW (state funded - of course...).
He ("it") fled the country a few years back. We're probably still "Facebook friends" on my old account, but frankly I do not care enough to check, lol...
it sounds like it could be sarcasm. is the tweeter a faggot or sjw?
With the check mark next to his name it could be both
Yeah, I know him personally. It is... You are right, lol...
I know this person. IRL. Or I used to, at least... He's, uhh, both... Amusingly.