Dude is clearly under 30. He has no real memory of the world before 9/11. No inkling that bi-monthly islamic terror attacks in the west were not always a thing.
Even in the UK you would have been hard pressed to go more than 24 hours in 2002 without hearing about 9/11
We really are living in two seperate worlds. They cannot understand why anyone could possibly take issue with their pure, noble and inherently
good intentions.
This guy's a blithering idiot talking about shit he's too young to remember, but the real reason Turning Red deservers your hate is because it's basically a feature length ad telling young girls to make an Onlyfans the first chance they get.
funny.. well not funny. women only talk about their vaginas and periods. seriously, lol wtf. all the so called female comedians also only talk about vaginas and periods.
The discussion around this movie is so toxic and the fanbase so vocal that had it not been for them it would've flown over my head completely like the past 10 or so Pixar movies.
Luca was golden. I will 100% stand by Luca as a modern classic that had no right to be so perfectly done. Especially in The Current Year.
Other than that, yeah. Pixar's hasn't had an unambiguously good movie since Toy Story 3.
Hmm... Yeah. I remember loving Incredibles II, but its reliance on the "Twist Villain" trope made it substantially weaker than part I. Not helping matters is that Evelyn Deavour (yes, I spoiled her Identity because she's so pathetic) is a MASSIVE downgrade over Syndrome.
So yeah. Your statement still stands.
Yes there was a critic who said that the producer made the movie only for her, her family and close friends because it's very hard for anyone else to relate to it and he got flamed hard for it even though he's absolutely right. The movie was marketed as for children 5-10, same as all other Pixar movies, but how the hell are they going to understand the appeal of boy bands? Tamagotchi? Manga and 90s anime? All of it will fly over children's head yet the plot revolves around these things.
Both Azure and I have forgotten which of his accounts was the original one, but I am going to assume he had a 40 day ban, and I think he's past that time frame, so I'll just treat this one as the "New Original" one.
****sodom and gomorrah
Seriously, Turning Red fans can go fuck themselves. Sure, Mr. Enter said that the movie should've shown the impact of 9/11 on western society, but THAT'S BECAUSE IT WOULD SHOW THAT THE MOVIE IS AN EARLY 2000s PERIOD PIECE. Be it the news or the satire, the new awareness of Terrorism was a major part of the 2000s, and the fact that Turning Red doesn't feature it proves that they wanted to set it in present-day Toronto.
Not to mention, an old favourite channel of mine, LioConvoy Reviews, got in on this act too, and just looking at the comments tells me that he has royally lost it. sneed.
This movie takes place in 2002 despite the incredibly 2022 setting. Nobody acts like 9/11 just happened. Not even the adults. Nobody is sad or paranoid. Nobody tackles or tazes the psycho mother during the scene where she gets onto school grounds without permission to give her 13 year old daughter her tampon pads.
The movie tries to make the mother look insane and unreasonable because she does not approve of child twerking or prostitution.
Then why set it in 2002? Why deliberately choose that year when you know you’re not going to honor the setting?
Lemme guess: one of the female writers is self-inserting and can’t fathom changing the year because that’s when she was the same age as the protagonist.
Lemme guess: one of the female writers is self-inserting and can’t fathom changing the year because that’s when she was the same age as the protagonist.
Those hacks don't know how to write a good movie so they pick their own IRL history(or how they'd want it: herstory barf ) to write something they pretend is so deep and talks about so much when it in fact is mostly about periods. Amy Schumer would be proud(and probably already stole some of it for her """"comedy"""").
they still want kids to relate to it to want to watch it
Yes, I want kids to relate to someone who effectively creates fucking cheese pizza to get money. Or were they hoping kids go "haha I own a cellphone too!"?
I watched He-man and GIjoe when I was young and never had trouble relating, even though they were grown ass men fighting wars I would never have to even live through.
What's a stretch is assuming the writers had a motive other than being retarded.
It's a forced meme among the left. Some guy (Mr. Enter, whoever that is) said that the movie doesn't address 9/11, so now the NPCs are forcing themselves to pretend that the right wing is mad that the movie wasn't based solely around 9/11.
Here was his deranged alt-right rant:
This film takes place less than a year after the September 11 terrorist attacks. I bring this up because it radically altered the culture of the time in ways that make this movie feel exceptionally ignorant of the time.
Yes, that's the entire thing.
He's not entirely wrong. It's all people on this continent were talking about for years to come. It would be a little weird for a kid's movie to address it, but this isn't a kid's movie. It's a movie for thirtysomething Asian women disguised as a children's movie.
I remember a lot of comments about people saying "well, in reality, 9/11 wasn't that important to kids in Canada". I don't understand why people suddenly care about "accuracy to reality" when the movie itself threw it away to give every single preteen a fucking cellphone.
I genuinely had no idea it was supposed to take place in 2002 until after I watched it and read the Wikipedia article. The only real hint is that the kids all had candy bar and flip phones rather than smart phones, and that the main character had a Tamagotchi, but both of those things are still sold in exactly the same form as in the movie, and the idea of a bunch of 13 year olds not being given expensive smartphones was just taken for granted by me.
They didn't actually reference anything that happened in the early 2000s. The only way you'd ever know is if you paid really close attention and connected all the vague one-shot references together.
Canadian kids most certainly were not running around with flip phones in the early 2000s like scandavian kids with their cheap Nokias in the 90s, because cell phone service was fucking EXHORBITANT at the time, and if they did have one, it'd be a pay-as-you-go. Canada was WAY behind the rest of the world in making cell phone service reasonably affordable, and I'm quite sure that was well after 2002.
And yeah, 9/11 WAS important for Canadians and their kids, it was all over the news here, too, and for sure they talked about it in schools as endlessly as everywhere else. Not to mention the fact that people from everfuckingwhere worked in those buildings.
And this is why totalitarianism is coming to the West, btw. The younger generations have never been NOT under constant surveillance. Thanks, cell phones.
Everyone except some 11-13 year old tween who got her first period in 2002. The rest of us might have been talking about 9/11, terrorism and Afghanistan, a tween-teen girl probably wasn't.
A very young britbong wondering why 9-11 is a thing. Right
Dude is clearly under 30. He has no real memory of the world before 9/11. No inkling that bi-monthly islamic terror attacks in the west were not always a thing.
Even in the UK you would have been hard pressed to go more than 24 hours in 2002 without hearing about 9/11
And the moron doesn’t realize immediately after 9/11 there were a ton of bombings in Britain.
We really are living in two seperate worlds. They cannot understand why anyone could possibly take issue with their pure, noble and inherently good intentions.
Groomers gonna groom
This guy's a blithering idiot talking about shit he's too young to remember, but the real reason Turning Red deservers your hate is because it's basically a feature length ad telling young girls to make an Onlyfans the first chance they get.
What the fuck is Turning Red? This animation is giving me cancer.
New Pixar movie. An "achievement" by an all woman writing team. Girl's first period turns her into a big red panda. Hijinks ensue.
>woman finally given free reign to create something new
>it's about their fucking period
Holy fuck, why are they like this?!
Their womb is literally the only thing women have going for them. Without it they are nothing.
That's not fair. Without it, women are inferior men...
funny.. well not funny. women only talk about their vaginas and periods. seriously, lol wtf. all the so called female comedians also only talk about vaginas and periods.
The discussion around this movie is so toxic and the fanbase so vocal that had it not been for them it would've flown over my head completely like the past 10 or so Pixar movies.
Luca was golden. I will 100% stand by Luca as a modern classic that had no right to be so perfectly done. Especially in The Current Year. Other than that, yeah. Pixar's hasn't had an unambiguously good movie since Toy Story 3.
Hmm... Yeah. I remember loving Incredibles II, but its reliance on the "Twist Villain" trope made it substantially weaker than part I. Not helping matters is that Evelyn Deavour (yes, I spoiled her Identity because she's so pathetic) is a MASSIVE downgrade over Syndrome. So yeah. Your statement still stands.
Are you being serious?!? Is this supposed to be a kids’ movie?!?
Wasn’t their a critic who got attacked for not liking this movie.
Yeah, Mr Enter is getting harassed for critiquing the movie
Yes there was a critic who said that the producer made the movie only for her, her family and close friends because it's very hard for anyone else to relate to it and he got flamed hard for it even though he's absolutely right. The movie was marketed as for children 5-10, same as all other Pixar movies, but how the hell are they going to understand the appeal of boy bands? Tamagotchi? Manga and 90s anime? All of it will fly over children's head yet the plot revolves around these things.
Seems to be the trend for movies that are the darlings of the right crowd
Dude had a bit of a stupid take, but the reaction to what he said is hella overblown.
Yup. Even channels I once respected got in on the act.
I mean, he had the weirdest hot take, so it was kind of earned.
Yeah, this dude seems like a raging, leftist retard.
ugly animation style where everyone looks ugly or down syndrome lol.
Comment Reported for: ban evasion
Both Azure and I have forgotten which of his accounts was the original one, but I am going to assume he had a 40 day ban, and I think he's past that time frame, so I'll just treat this one as the "New Original" one.
wasnt turning red the based movie where they repel the russhians? thats too 'sensitive' for the shitlibs today.
That was Red Dawn.
Also not to be confused with Reds.
>Red Dawn, but the lead is giant fucking red panda
****sodom and gomorrah Seriously, Turning Red fans can go fuck themselves. Sure, Mr. Enter said that the movie should've shown the impact of 9/11 on western society, but THAT'S BECAUSE IT WOULD SHOW THAT THE MOVIE IS AN EARLY 2000s PERIOD PIECE. Be it the news or the satire, the new awareness of Terrorism was a major part of the 2000s, and the fact that Turning Red doesn't feature it proves that they wanted to set it in present-day Toronto.
Not to mention, an old favourite channel of mine, LioConvoy Reviews, got in on this act too, and just looking at the comments tells me that he has royally lost it. sneed.
This movie takes place in 2002 despite the incredibly 2022 setting. Nobody acts like 9/11 just happened. Not even the adults. Nobody is sad or paranoid. Nobody tackles or tazes the psycho mother during the scene where she gets onto school grounds without permission to give her 13 year old daughter her tampon pads.
The movie tries to make the mother look insane and unreasonable because she does not approve of child twerking or prostitution.
It takes place I'm 2002, but they still want kids to relate to it to want to watch it. Compromises needed to be made.
Then why set it in 2002? Why deliberately choose that year when you know you’re not going to honor the setting?
Lemme guess: one of the female writers is self-inserting and can’t fathom changing the year because that’s when she was the same age as the protagonist.
Winner winner chicken dinner!
Like, what else could it be?
Those hacks don't know how to write a good movie so they pick their own IRL history(or how they'd want it: herstory barf ) to write something they pretend is so deep and talks about so much when it in fact is mostly about periods. Amy Schumer would be proud(and probably already stole some of it for her """"comedy"""").
It is based on the film director's experience. She is Asian from Canada.
Self insertion lmao
Yes, I want kids to relate to someone who effectively creates fucking cheese pizza to get money. Or were they hoping kids go "haha I own a cellphone too!"?
They were hoping to plant the idea that kids can get money for taking pictures of themselves.
"It takes place in 300 B.C., but they still want car enthusiasts to relate to it, so Caesar has a Camaro S.S. with a 450".
Is a hell of a take.
That's a bit of a stretch. This movie's target audience is clearly young. I reason still stands.
off topic: I kinda wish we had more films based in Ancient Rome. Feels like a missed opportunity.
I watched He-man and GIjoe when I was young and never had trouble relating, even though they were grown ass men fighting wars I would never have to even live through.
What's a stretch is assuming the writers had a motive other than being retarded.
It's a forced meme among the left. Some guy (Mr. Enter, whoever that is) said that the movie doesn't address 9/11, so now the NPCs are forcing themselves to pretend that the right wing is mad that the movie wasn't based solely around 9/11.
Here was his deranged alt-right rant:
Yes, that's the entire thing.
He's not entirely wrong. It's all people on this continent were talking about for years to come. It would be a little weird for a kid's movie to address it, but this isn't a kid's movie. It's a movie for thirtysomething Asian women disguised as a children's movie.
I remember a lot of comments about people saying "well, in reality, 9/11 wasn't that important to kids in Canada". I don't understand why people suddenly care about "accuracy to reality" when the movie itself threw it away to give every single preteen a fucking cellphone.
Yes it was. Everything that happens in the US happens in Canada 6 months later.
We went with you guys into Afghanistan because of 9/11; we didn't even go to Vietnam.
I genuinely had no idea it was supposed to take place in 2002 until after I watched it and read the Wikipedia article. The only real hint is that the kids all had candy bar and flip phones rather than smart phones, and that the main character had a Tamagotchi, but both of those things are still sold in exactly the same form as in the movie, and the idea of a bunch of 13 year olds not being given expensive smartphones was just taken for granted by me.
They didn't actually reference anything that happened in the early 2000s. The only way you'd ever know is if you paid really close attention and connected all the vague one-shot references together.
Canadian kids most certainly were not running around with flip phones in the early 2000s like scandavian kids with their cheap Nokias in the 90s, because cell phone service was fucking EXHORBITANT at the time, and if they did have one, it'd be a pay-as-you-go. Canada was WAY behind the rest of the world in making cell phone service reasonably affordable, and I'm quite sure that was well after 2002.
And yeah, 9/11 WAS important for Canadians and their kids, it was all over the news here, too, and for sure they talked about it in schools as endlessly as everywhere else. Not to mention the fact that people from everfuckingwhere worked in those buildings.
And this is why totalitarianism is coming to the West, btw. The younger generations have never been NOT under constant surveillance. Thanks, cell phones.
Still is...
Compared to other countries? It probably is. But it's still way fucking better than it was before.
For such a sprawling country, our travel and communications options suck dead paki balls.
Everyone except some 11-13 year old tween who got her first period in 2002. The rest of us might have been talking about 9/11, terrorism and Afghanistan, a tween-teen girl probably wasn't.
The 13 year old girl might not know what 9/11 is but all adults in that movie act like it never happened.
But shes a self insert from someone who was a teen just after 9/11, hence its ignored because she ignored it at the time.
Kind of fucked up how she paid no attention to 9/11 at the time.
I only knew about it from the memes. But I still knew what it was. It was inescapable.
I think Mr. Enter just lives rent free in the heads of people who hate him.