Jussie should go up to the biggest, toughest inmate on the cell block and lecture him about his homophobia and tell him he needs to do better. I hear inmates are very receptive to leftist activism behind bars.
So am I. It helps that the prosecutor was interested in justice instead of a slap on the wrist. Props to everyone who everyone who pushed for the special prosecutor. It also appears the judge was honest which is a real miracle in a shit hole like Chicago. The judge probably didn't take too kindly to the defense slandering him when it became clear he wasn't in their pocket. All judges should be like this guy and Kyle Rittenhouse's judge.
The Rittenhouse judge seemed like a friendly and unbiased judge, but he also allowed the crooked ADA Binger to introduce any and all sketchy evidence the state could come up to show to the jury and essentially broke every evidentiary and due process law that exists.
It could have turned out very differently if the jury wasn't based and the ADA wasn't so unlikable and hated.
A hate crime hoax is a hate crime. You're not just the boy who cried wolf faking an attack for your own aggrandisement, you are pointing at an identity group (Trump supporters) and encouraging retaliatory violence against them. It's blood libel.
I saw a short clip of the sentencing on Rekieta Law last night.
Smollett stood up in court after sentencing, said a whole bunch of BLM shit and grandstanded before the judge essentially demanding that he couldn't go to jail, then yelled "I am not suicidal " a million times in a John McAfee/ Jeffrey Epstein moment.
While I would have liked him to get more time in the grey bar hotel as justice for the harm he caused, it is a felony collar with felony probation afterward.
This means he can't vote, democrat or otherwise (until he dies and auto-enrolls as a democrat).
Jussie will not be able to legally carry/own a firearm. He lives in Chiraq which means legal guns barely exist, but it is technically an entanglement.
Jussie will not be able to hold public office, barring some sort of carve-out, which based on current levels of corruption is possible.
While I do not view a paltry 150 days as justice, there are consequences beyond the time in the can.
I've been heavily going in that direction the last several years. The one thing slightly holding me back is the potential difficulty in distinguishing between between actual false accusation and someone being legitimately mistaken, but with the sheer number of blatantly false accusations need something done about them.
People have lost all ability to even use words in context. Nobody who wants people who bring false accusations punished are talking about cases of mistaken identity or where they simply don't have enough evidence to convict, but we use the word "false" so they think we mean any time someone loses a case.
Jussie should go up to the biggest, toughest inmate on the cell block and lecture him about his homophobia and tell him he needs to do better. I hear inmates are very receptive to leftist activism behind bars.
I think he might enjoy the result a little too much.
It depends on whether he's usually a pitcher or a catcher.
Look at the guy, you can make up your own mind on Juicy but I am pretty sure he'd enjoy it a little too much.
He’s the gay Tupac after all.
I'm surprised he got jail time.
So am I. It helps that the prosecutor was interested in justice instead of a slap on the wrist. Props to everyone who everyone who pushed for the special prosecutor. It also appears the judge was honest which is a real miracle in a shit hole like Chicago. The judge probably didn't take too kindly to the defense slandering him when it became clear he wasn't in their pocket. All judges should be like this guy and Kyle Rittenhouse's judge.
I'm not.
I'm not even certain the judge was honest. Just angry at his incredulity.
If there's one thing that every level of the judiciary hates its when people purposefully waste their time.
The Rittenhouse judge seemed like a friendly and unbiased judge, but he also allowed the crooked ADA Binger to introduce any and all sketchy evidence the state could come up to show to the jury and essentially broke every evidentiary and due process law that exists.
It could have turned out very differently if the jury wasn't based and the ADA wasn't so unlikable and hated.
Back on Faggit the r/news thread on this is locked because of course it is.
y'all can't behave
A hate crime hoax is a hate crime. You're not just the boy who cried wolf faking an attack for your own aggrandisement, you are pointing at an identity group (Trump supporters) and encouraging retaliatory violence against them. It's blood libel.
Way too short of a sentence, but I expected the judge to aquit + profusely apologize to Juicy Sommelier, so I guess...
A smoll sentence. Jussietice indeed.
Good. I hope his prison boyfriends sexually abuse him to death. And then everyone in the prison die of Jussie-AIDS.
Down with the self-proclaimed master species. May it return to the hells that spawned it.
Looks like they updated the story.. for some reason the archive page is still from this morning.
I saw a short clip of the sentencing on Rekieta Law last night.
Smollett stood up in court after sentencing, said a whole bunch of BLM shit and grandstanded before the judge essentially demanding that he couldn't go to jail, then yelled "I am not suicidal " a million times in a John McAfee/ Jeffrey Epstein moment.
While I would have liked him to get more time in the grey bar hotel as justice for the harm he caused, it is a felony collar with felony probation afterward.
This means he can't vote, democrat or otherwise (until he dies and auto-enrolls as a democrat).
Jussie will not be able to legally carry/own a firearm. He lives in Chiraq which means legal guns barely exist, but it is technically an entanglement.
Jussie will not be able to hold public office, barring some sort of carve-out, which based on current levels of corruption is possible.
While I do not view a paltry 150 days as justice, there are consequences beyond the time in the can.
Hope he has time to reflect.
Nasty Nate wants your fruit cocktail.
I've been heavily going in that direction the last several years. The one thing slightly holding me back is the potential difficulty in distinguishing between between actual false accusation and someone being legitimately mistaken, but with the sheer number of blatantly false accusations need something done about them.
People have lost all ability to even use words in context. Nobody who wants people who bring false accusations punished are talking about cases of mistaken identity or where they simply don't have enough evidence to convict, but we use the word "false" so they think we mean any time someone loses a case.
There are far too many who continue to be ignorant even after it's been explained.