Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

77
This Is How The Woke View Themselves (media.communities.win)
posted 4 years ago by Ahaus667 4 years ago by Ahaus667 +77 / -0
46 comments download share
46 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (46)
sorted by:
▲ 30 ▼
– Ahaus667 [S] 30 points 4 years ago +30 / -0

Latvian statue of “frontline” workers. It’s literal worship of wokeness as a deity.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– SupremeReader 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

They might have "frontline workers" soon at this rate of Russian aggression.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– cartoonericroberts 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

*Russia pushback against NATO encirclement

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– SupremeReader 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

"Encirclement" from one side?

I guess the Kaliningrad Military District has been actually "encircled" by us in Poland, but that's ever since they have Physically Removed all the native Prussians from Konigsberg in 1945.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– cartoonericroberts 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

They are undeniably circling Russia. "Not one inch" becomes "oh, just some of Eastern Europe oh and some Baltic states and oh some Balkan states and more Balkan states, how about fucking Turkey, and please ignore the color revolutions in Central Asia... and uh maybe Georgia can join..." And beyond the blatant aggression of this I don't want a mutual defense pact with every fucking country that shares a border with Russia. "Don't worry, Russia, it's not technically a circle because we haven't figured out how to admit the Arctic to NATO."

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SupremeReader 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Whatever "one inch" are you talking about? Is it paraphrased from some treaty? Any document or even just a declaration?

There were no "color revolutions in Central Asia". And NATO was never interested in Central Asian countries other than Afghanistan, other than a short lived American affair with the Manas Transit Center (for the war effort in Afghanistan 20 years ago), and even Afghanistan has been abandoned.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– cartoonericroberts 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Firstly, https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/russia-programs/2017-12-12/nato-expansion-what-gorbachev-heard-western-leaders-early. Secondly, Kazakhstan.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SupremeReader 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

And you know what? Shevardnadze himself soon became president of Georgia and began courting NATO to accept his new and independent country. Like here: https://www.nato.int/docu/speech/2002/s021122h.htm This is how irrelevant is what they told Shevardnadze in 1990 when everything was completely different.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SupremeReader 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Gorbachev was a Soviet leader, surely he didn't talk about the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic's relations with NATO during this Cold War meeting. As relevant as the Ribbentrop-Molotov if they talk about "Soviet borders".

What "secondly, Kazakhstan"?

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 1 ▼
– SupremeReader 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

And you know what else? I just found a 2009 interview where Shevardnadze himself will explain everything to you (also about Gorbachev, who in fact wanted to "encircle Russia" totally by having the Soviet Union join NATO once the Cold War was over):

SPIEGEL ONLINE: In February 1990, Germany's foreign minister at the time, Hans-Dietrich Genscher, assured you that "NATO will not expand to the east," and that states like Poland and Hungary could never be part of the military alliance. Because the conversation had revolved mainly around East Germany, Genscher even became more explicit, saying that: "As far as the non-expansion of NATO is concerned, this also applies in general." According to reports, you replied that you believed everything he said. So why didn't you get this commitment from NATO on paper?

Shevardnadze: Times have changed. At the time we couldn't believe that the Warsaw Pact could be dissolved. It was beyond our realm of comprehension. None of the participating countries had doubts about the Warsaw Pact. And the three Baltic states, which are now part of NATO, were still part of the Soviet Union then. Eventually, we agreed that a united Germany could be part of NATO under certain conditions. For example, a national army limited to 370,000 members and Germany waives the right to nuclear weapons. An expansion of NATO beyond Germany's borders was out of the question.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: At the end of March 1990, Genscher and the then US Secretary of State James Baker, talked about the fact that there was interest among "central European states" about getting into NATO. You knew nothing of this?

Shevardnadze: This is the first I've heard of it.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Did you have a conversation with your colleagues in Poland, Czechoslovakia and Hungary about a possible eastward expansion of NATO in the spring of 1990?

Shevardnadze: No, that was never discussed in my presence.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: The German documents give the impression that Moscow counted on the dissolution of both the Warsaw Pact and NATO. Did you really think that would happen?

Shevardnadze: That may have been discussed after I resigned from the ministry of foreign affairs in December 1990. However during my time in office it was not.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: In May 1990, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev brought up the subject of the Soviet Union joining NATO during talks with the Americans. The Americans took that very seriously.

Shevardnadze: Gorbachev had that idea but he never took any realistic steps towards achieving this. Which is why it was never really discussed amongst the Soviet leaders.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Was the eastward expansion of NATO ever discussed in the inner circles of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in 1990?

Shevardnadze: The question never came up.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Did the subject play a role in the ratification process of the Two-Plus-Four agreement (where the signatories included the two Germanys and the four powers that occupied Germany after World War II) that unified Germany?

Shevardnadze: No, there were no difficulties whatsoever with the ratification process.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Nevertheless, the eastward expansion happened a few years later. Did you feel, at the time, that the German diplomats deceived you?

Shevardnadze: No. When I was the minister of foreign affairs in the Soviet Union, NATO's expansion beyond the German borders never came up for negotiation. To this day I don't see anything terrible in NATO's expansion. Even Georgia was given the green light to join NATO at the Bucharest summit in April 2008.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: At the conference in Ottawa on German unity in February 1990, you had five telephone conversations with Gorbachev. Did you discuss a possible NATO enlargement -- beyond the GDR?

Shevardnadze: No. We only had German reunification on the agenda, nothing else. It was important to clarify our position, because France and Britain were opposed to the reunification of Germany. They were afraid of the emergence of a superpower with a huge political, military and economic potential, right in the center of Europe. The most stubborn of all reunification opponents was the British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. When she spoke to Gorbachev in June 1990, they discussed the subject for hours. In the end she changed her position.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– elleand202 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

I hate this adoration of doctors and nurses. I'm friends with a number of doctors and they're not "noble healers," they're meat mechanics. They care about their patients about as much as any other service worker cares about their customers. Most doctors are in it for the money and prestige.

If doctors actually cared about their patients, they'd have a suicide rate similar to veterinarians, who actually do suffer from compassion fatigue.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 26 ▼
– deleted 26 points 4 years ago +26 / -0
▲ 15 ▼
– AbleistSL 15 points 4 years ago +15 / -0

These people believe their ideology is god and that everyone who opposes it wants to end their human rights, leading to their likely deaths as they believe they cannot function without said rights they falsely believe they will lose/consider critical.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– FuckGenderPolitics 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

Now would be a very good time for some more based lightning.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– SupremeReader 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

A lightning struck Martin Luther once and it only made him more deranged.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– Cup-a-Fart 20 points 4 years ago +20 / -0

Shouldn’t there be, I dunno, people around them who are being attended to? Not just a statue of a self-important diversity doctor?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– DefinitelyNotIGN 18 points 4 years ago +18 / -0

That would imply that they have responsibilities.

Their idealized version of themselves is merely universally admired and worshipped for no reason at all except that they're better than you. Having responsibilities is for alt-right-wingers.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– NotAGlowy 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Explains why they thought they’d be worshiped for making TikTok videos

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Knife-TotingRat 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

You know what metaphor came to mind?

Dragon Ball franchise: "Emperor" Pilaf is asked by one of his henchmen what he planned to do once he took over the world. Turns out he hadn't gotten further than imagining himself simply standing on a balcony getting cheered at. That's it. That's the whole reason he wanted to take over the world, because he thought people would love him for it.

I think that's also The Brain's whole fucking grand plan, too ....

If dogs are dumb loyalists, and cats are vain, and this and that species is this and that, well, the hallmark of Man is his hubristic narcissism. It just manifests right at the surface with more individuals than you'd like to think.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– FutaCumDiet 12 points 4 years ago +12 / -0

Oh just have it nailed on a fucking cross made of syringes, why don't you?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Baron_Bubbles 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0

Tell me you're a narcissistic egomaniacal psychopath without telling me you're a narcissistic egomaniacal psychopath

Edit: The only thing missing is it doing the Baphomet hand gestures.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Assassin47 9 points 4 years ago +9 / -0

Isn't there a Thomas Sowell book about this attitude?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– Ahaus667 [S] 11 points 4 years ago +11 / -0

Vision of the Anointed I believe

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– deleted 9 points 4 years ago +9 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– Grumman 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

But how many doses has she had? How can we know if this is a statue of a heroic front-liner or a filthy unboostered apostate?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Alexius_von_Meinong 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– BidenLikesMiners 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

It's a doctor wearing a "surgical" mask, and thats what the masks are designed for. not cringe

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– CptLightning 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Go vaccinate yourself

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Assassin47 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

The mask isn't the ridiculous part.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy