Comments (54)
sorted by:
NihilistCaregiver 40 points ago +40 / -0

She wouldn't have the same opinion if SCOTUS was 6-3 in leftist favor and the OSHA mandate was ruled legal. Statist cunt.

TheImpossible1 -20 points ago +4 / -24

She would if the vax harmed women.

Pandelume 32 points ago +32 / -0

It also harms women.

TheImpossible1 -14 points ago +5 / -19

At a rate higher than a rounding error then.

monkebrau 5 points ago +5 / -0

It does. Of course.

Johan_Liebert 5 points ago +5 / -0

It does. Period issues and sterilizations are a SERIOUS issue that they ignore....Many women are going to be unpleasantly surprised when they find out they're baron in the near future.

SarcasticRidley 6 points ago +6 / -0

I would be pleasantly surprised if I were a Baron in the future.

Johan_Liebert 3 points ago +3 / -0

Weird flex but you do you.

TheImpossible1 -1 points ago +1 / -2


M1919A2 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is turning into an episode of Stargate SG-1...

Edit: I was going to say from 10 years ago, then realize the episode was titled 2010 and aired 20 years ago...i feel old now.

current_horror 28 points ago +28 / -0

"you can't force people to do that" = "power grab"

when_we_win_remember 13 points ago +13 / -0

They are used to the SC ruling that the government can do whatever it wants, unless the guy doing it is named Trump, so this is a shock to them.

Ahaus667 [S] 27 points ago +27 / -0

But the biggest loser coming out of these decisions is not the president’s reputation as a problem solver but decades of constitutionally established power-sharing between the legislative and executive branches. And the winner, if that’s the right term, is the Supreme Court itself, which has executed an unprecedented power grab and masked it as an act of judicial restraint.

There’s nothing constitutional about government agencies that operate outside of elected representatives.

ernsithe 22 points ago +22 / -0

Their implication is that the power to do this shit existed within the legislative or executive branches in the first place.

You can't share a power you don't have. OSHA could have the full powers of Congress and this should have still been knocked down.

almond_activator 5 points ago +5 / -0

You can't share a power you don't have. OSHA could have the full powers of Congress and this should have still been knocked down.

At least 3/9 agree with us on this point.

Pandelume 20 points ago +20 / -0

They know. They don't care.

Assassin47 16 points ago +16 / -0

Nothing constitutional about either "power-sharing" or any federal control over employment. Closest thing to power-sharing would be the advise and consent clause. I bet she doesn't think that the old ruling where the Supreme Court determined that the Supreme Court had the authority to determine what's constitutional was a "power grab".

"Decades of constitutionally established..." is just gay propaganda.

TentElephant 27 points ago +27 / -0

The friend-enemy distinction should be in sharp focus for everyone by now.

IfThatIsWhatYouThink 19 points ago +19 / -0

Here comes that new narrative to justify packing the court. They can't have them voting against the party again in the future.

Assassin47 11 points ago +12 / -1

Make it a giant court assembly with 150 rotating judges. Accelerate. I'm tired of pretending the US is a constitutional republic.

TheImpossible1 13 points ago +16 / -3

Let's make appointments by randomly picking people, like jury duty.

"Oh no, I've been summoned to the Supreme Court."

AllGunsNoCope 5 points ago +5 / -0

Elect me as the tie-breaking vote to replace Manchin and I'll give the Democrats a compromise, I'll pass all the gender madness communist bullshit they want, and in return all I ask is that we rename the United States of America to the United States of Gravy.

Also, every member of Congress must change their last name to Tits McGee and every street name in the United Gravy becomes my name, but with varying amounts of each letter to differentiate them. Like Morse code made out of the letters of my name. That way they can't abbreviate it on any package, they have to write the full thing every time.

Also, CIA is renamed to the DIF, the Department of Invasion Fluffing, the Navy becomes the Gay Force, and all state police officers, FBI agents, and military police are legally required to carry a dildo in a holster opposite their gun.

None of that really changes anything, it's just optics stuff. The Democrats would probably go for it. Its just stuff that makes it more obvious what a clown show our country is so people stop pretending things are OK or sane. Maybe the normies would start to snap out of their trance then.

BidenLikesMiners 2 points ago +2 / -0

ass's idea is fucking retarded. they will pick judges from san fran. and imp, we shouldnt have the average intellect people ruling on the court, one court with 8 libs, oops, there goes free speech for everyone whos not a shitlib.

Assassin47 2 points ago +2 / -0

go home brandon you're drunk

TheImpossible1 1 point ago +2 / -1

It's a joke idea. It's less about getting a majority of liberals and more about the level of retarded moron you could get writing opinions.

Assassin47 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just make it all women.

TheImpossible1 1 point ago +1 / -0

"We declare the vax mandate constitutional because the terrible awful men might die faster."

altmehere 14 points ago +14 / -0

What the majority is really saying, then, is that it doesn’t like how much power Congress gave to OSHA in the first place.

I'm pretty sure the problem isn't how much power OSHA has to act within its purview, it's OSHA acting outside its purview.

It probably doesn't help that Biden was clearly trying to push a mandate onto the general population and simply chose OSHA as the vehicle for it.

when_we_win_remember 8 points ago +8 / -0

Of course this person doesn't take questions, but I'd be asking them: "What, if anything, could OSHA order that you would deny is within their purview? If OSHA decided every employee must undergo a cavity check on the way into work to ensure workplace safety, would you go along?"

And to their point: Good. Congress has abdicated its responsibility too long, and the country has been left at the mercy of a merciless bureaucracy. Tell the executive they can't make arbitrary rules any more; they want something? get congress to do it

deleted 14 points ago +18 / -4
CatoTheElder 12 points ago +13 / -1


yeldarb1983 -1 points ago +2 / -3

distinction without a difference. Once represents socialism in theory, the other socialism in practice.

Unknownsailor 12 points ago +12 / -0

In a way, she isn't wrong, it is just that the power grab is not what she thinks it is. The USSC just let the federal government dictate to health care workers that they can be forced to take an injection as a condition of employment.

What I predict will happen from this is that parts of the medical care industry will start to divest itself from dealing with Medicare and Medicaid patients, and won't take that money. Concierge care is already a growing industry, with doctors and hospitals that don't take insurance of any kind, freeing themselves from the strings that come with accepting 3rd party payment.

Our current employee provided health care system is derived from the wage controls FDR implemented for WWII, where employers had to find a way to compete for workers outside of wages. So, they started to offer health insurance to attract employees.

Health insurance needs to be actual insurance again, something you use in a life altering event that you can't plan for, like cancer or a heart attack.

Mpetey123 7 points ago +8 / -1

WWII fucked up the economy in so many ways. The backing of the GI bill started the whole expensive college pricing as well.

almond_activator 6 points ago +6 / -0

The foundations for Medicare and Medicaid were laid during the Civil War of Northern Aggression. We've been sliding downhill longer than anyone alive can remember - and the same was true when the oldest living American was a teenager.

Mpetey123 7 points ago +7 / -0

True, what the war didn't fuck over Reconstruction did.

ailurus 4 points ago +4 / -0

What I predict will happen from this is that parts of the medical care industry will start to divest itself from dealing with Medicare and Medicaid patients, and won't take that money.

It's already happened, on a smaller scale. There's a reason that a bunch of doctors don't take medicare/medicade, because the reimbursement rates are too low to actually cover procedures and the paperwork is too much. I do hope this just accelerates the move in that direction.

elleand202 12 points ago +12 / -0

What an ignorant article. It’s one thing if OSHA had mandated PPE (since they’ve done that before), but it’s unprecedented for OSHA to mandate a medical procedure in the name of “occupational health.”

As for judicial review, that ship sailed in 1803.

This whole article reeks of leftist sour grapes.

Mpetey123 10 points ago +10 / -0

The ruling striking down Biden’s vaccine mandate threatens decades of statutory authority to let agencies write important regulations.

No this is just garbage and Unconstitutional thinking. Considering the lady is connected to Baltimore it's not surprising she has the entire argument backwards.

GallantEnd 5 points ago +5 / -0

The sad thing is, the normies (or at least my coworkers) believe this

onetruephilosoraptor 7 points ago +7 / -0

What industry is this?

There is sadly a gargantuan level of support for leftist authoritarianism in academia, journalism and big tech companies.

SparkMandrill83 8 points ago +8 / -0

Its a tyranny of the midwits

BidenLikesMiners 3 points ago +3 / -0

The ruling striking down Biden’s vaccine mandate threatens decades of statutory authority to let agencies write important regulations.

"Agencies", not "presidents" retard, god our media is getting stupider and brazenerer.

bamboozler1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Laughs in Australian

At least your court pretends to not be completely bought by the executive…

After this week, and today in particular (Novak), Australia is no better than a fucking banana republic, on this front…

It is amazing how fucked up what has happened in my country in the last week has been.

So I’m glad, for you guys. We have somehow beat you in the “lack of separation of powers” stakes… 😳

Which is just… Frankly terrifying.

They’re this close to outright declaring vaccination literally mandatory, and the “unvaccinated” as terrorists. This fucking close. And the court, today, signed off on that. Insane… 🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️

TheImpossible1 -8 points ago +6 / -14


Stop. Proving. Me. Right. About. You.

I'm imagining a seething woman angrily tapping away at her keyboard because she doesn't get to force things into men's bodies.

It's some weird reverse rape fantasy for them, I swear.

Checked her Twitter. Yep.

elleand202 4 points ago +6 / -2

No, I checked out her early life and education and it did not check out.

when_we_win_remember 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks, Fren

TheImpossible1 -1 points ago +3 / -4

Oh no, does that mean I was right?

yeldarb1983 2 points ago +2 / -0

angrily tapping away at her keyboard

You misspelled fapping This is all just mental masturbation.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
TheImpossible1 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, she isn't. She's a woman with a history of hating men.

GimmeFuelGimmeFire 1 point ago +1 / -0

Usually the "I checked X and yep" is shorthand for something else. :p

TheImpossible1 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have a reputation here though, it's obvious I'm not a noticer.