Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

41
Politico: The Supreme Court Just Made an Incredible Power Grab (archive.ph)
posted 4 years ago by Ahaus667 4 years ago by Ahaus667 +41 / -0
54 comments share
54 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (54)
sorted by:
▲ 40 ▼
– deleted 40 points 4 years ago +40 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 32 ▼
– deleted 32 points 4 years ago +32 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– monkebrau 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

It does. Of course.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Johan_Liebert 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

It does. Period issues and sterilizations are a SERIOUS issue that they ignore....Many women are going to be unpleasantly surprised when they find out they're baron in the near future.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– SarcasticRidley 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

I would be pleasantly surprised if I were a Baron in the future.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Johan_Liebert 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Weird flex but you do you.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– M1919A2 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

This is turning into an episode of Stargate SG-1...

Edit: I was going to say from 10 years ago, then realize the episode was titled 2010 and aired 20 years ago...i feel old now.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 28 ▼
– current_horror 28 points 4 years ago +28 / -0

"you can't force people to do that" = "power grab"

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 13 points 4 years ago +13 / -0

They are used to the SC ruling that the government can do whatever it wants, unless the guy doing it is named Trump, so this is a shock to them.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 27 ▼
– Ahaus667 [S] 27 points 4 years ago +27 / -0

But the biggest loser coming out of these decisions is not the president’s reputation as a problem solver but decades of constitutionally established power-sharing between the legislative and executive branches. And the winner, if that’s the right term, is the Supreme Court itself, which has executed an unprecedented power grab and masked it as an act of judicial restraint.

There’s nothing constitutional about government agencies that operate outside of elected representatives.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 22 ▼
– deleted 22 points 4 years ago +22 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– almond_activator 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

You can't share a power you don't have. OSHA could have the full powers of Congress and this should have still been knocked down.

At least 3/9 agree with us on this point.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– deleted 20 points 4 years ago +20 / -0
▲ 16 ▼
– Assassin47 16 points 4 years ago +16 / -0

Nothing constitutional about either "power-sharing" or any federal control over employment. Closest thing to power-sharing would be the advise and consent clause. I bet she doesn't think that the old ruling where the Supreme Court determined that the Supreme Court had the authority to determine what's constitutional was a "power grab".

"Decades of constitutionally established..." is just gay propaganda.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 27 ▼
– TentElephant 27 points 4 years ago +27 / -0

The friend-enemy distinction should be in sharp focus for everyone by now.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– IfThatIsWhatYouThink 19 points 4 years ago +19 / -0

Here comes that new narrative to justify packing the court. They can't have them voting against the party again in the future.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– Assassin47 12 points 4 years ago +12 / -0

Make it a giant court assembly with 150 rotating judges. Accelerate. I'm tired of pretending the US is a constitutional republic.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– deleted 16 points 4 years ago +16 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– AllGunsNoCope 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Elect me as the tie-breaking vote to replace Manchin and I'll give the Democrats a compromise, I'll pass all the gender madness communist bullshit they want, and in return all I ask is that we rename the United States of America to the United States of Gravy.

Also, every member of Congress must change their last name to Tits McGee and every street name in the United Gravy becomes my name, but with varying amounts of each letter to differentiate them. Like Morse code made out of the letters of my name. That way they can't abbreviate it on any package, they have to write the full thing every time.

Also, CIA is renamed to the DIF, the Department of Invasion Fluffing, the Navy becomes the Gay Force, and all state police officers, FBI agents, and military police are legally required to carry a dildo in a holster opposite their gun.

None of that really changes anything, it's just optics stuff. The Democrats would probably go for it. Its just stuff that makes it more obvious what a clown show our country is so people stop pretending things are OK or sane. Maybe the normies would start to snap out of their trance then.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– BidenLikesMiners 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

ass's idea is fucking retarded. they will pick judges from san fran. and imp, we shouldnt have the average intellect people ruling on the court, one court with 8 libs, oops, there goes free speech for everyone whos not a shitlib.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Assassin47 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

go home brandon you're drunk

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– Assassin47 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Just make it all women.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 14 ▼
– altmehere 14 points 4 years ago +14 / -0

What the majority is really saying, then, is that it doesn’t like how much power Congress gave to OSHA in the first place.

I'm pretty sure the problem isn't how much power OSHA has to act within its purview, it's OSHA acting outside its purview.

It probably doesn't help that Biden was clearly trying to push a mandate onto the general population and simply chose OSHA as the vehicle for it.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

Of course this person doesn't take questions, but I'd be asking them: "What, if anything, could OSHA order that you would deny is within their purview? If OSHA decided every employee must undergo a cavity check on the way into work to ensure workplace safety, would you go along?"

And to their point: Good. Congress has abdicated its responsibility too long, and the country has been left at the mercy of a merciless bureaucracy. Tell the executive they can't make arbitrary rules any more; they want something? get congress to do it

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– elleand202 12 points 4 years ago +12 / -0

What an ignorant article. It’s one thing if OSHA had mandated PPE (since they’ve done that before), but it’s unprecedented for OSHA to mandate a medical procedure in the name of “occupational health.”

As for judicial review, that ship sailed in 1803.

This whole article reeks of leftist sour grapes.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– GallantEnd 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

The sad thing is, the normies (or at least my coworkers) believe this

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– onetruephilosoraptor 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

What industry is this?

There is sadly a gargantuan level of support for leftist authoritarianism in academia, journalism and big tech companies.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– SparkMandrill83 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

Its a tyranny of the midwits

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– BidenLikesMiners 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

The ruling striking down Biden’s vaccine mandate threatens decades of statutory authority to let agencies write important regulations.

"Agencies", not "presidents" retard, god our media is getting stupider and brazenerer.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– yeldarb1983 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

https://youtu.be/rkclSQnBwj4?t=78

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– bamboozler1 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Laughs in Australian…

At least your court pretends to not be completely bought by the executive…

After this week, and today in particular (Novak), Australia is no better than a fucking banana republic, on this front…

It is amazing how fucked up what has happened in my country in the last week has been.

So I’m glad, for you guys. We have somehow beat you in the “lack of separation of powers” stakes… 😳

Which is just… Frankly terrifying.

They’re this close to outright declaring vaccination literally mandatory, and the “unvaccinated” as terrorists. This fucking close. And the court, today, signed off on that. Insane… 🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️

permalink save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– deleted 18 points 4 years ago +18 / -0
▲ 13 ▼
– CatoTheElder 13 points 4 years ago +13 / -0

Communist.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– yeldarb1983 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

distinction without a difference. Once represents socialism in theory, the other socialism in practice.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– deleted 12 points 4 years ago +12 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– ailurus 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

What I predict will happen from this is that parts of the medical care industry will start to divest itself from dealing with Medicare and Medicaid patients, and won't take that money.

It's already happened, on a smaller scale. There's a reason that a bunch of doctors don't take medicare/medicade, because the reimbursement rates are too low to actually cover procedures and the paperwork is too much. I do hope this just accelerates the move in that direction.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– deleted 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– almond_activator 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

The foundations for Medicare and Medicaid were laid during the Civil War of Northern Aggression. We've been sliding downhill longer than anyone alive can remember - and the same was true when the oldest living American was a teenager.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 10 ▼
– deleted 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– elleand202 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

No, I checked out her early life and education and it did not check out.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Thanks, Fren

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– yeldarb1983 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

angrily tapping away at her keyboard

You misspelled fapping This is all just mental masturbation.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– GimmeFuelGimmeFire 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Usually the "I checked X and yep" is shorthand for something else. :p

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy