But the biggest loser coming out of these decisions is not the president’s reputation as a problem solver but decades of constitutionally established power-sharing between the legislative and executive branches. And the winner, if that’s the right term, is the Supreme Court itself, which has executed an unprecedented power grab and masked it as an act of judicial restraint.
There’s nothing constitutional about government agencies that operate outside of elected representatives.
Nothing constitutional about either "power-sharing" or any federal control over employment. Closest thing to power-sharing would be the advise and consent clause. I bet she doesn't think that the old ruling where the Supreme Court determined that the Supreme Court had the authority to determine what's constitutional was a "power grab".
"Decades of constitutionally established..." is just gay propaganda.
There’s nothing constitutional about government agencies that operate outside of elected representatives.
At least 3/9 agree with us on this point.
Nothing constitutional about either "power-sharing" or any federal control over employment. Closest thing to power-sharing would be the advise and consent clause. I bet she doesn't think that the old ruling where the Supreme Court determined that the Supreme Court had the authority to determine what's constitutional was a "power grab".
"Decades of constitutionally established..." is just gay propaganda.