Evolution and biology don’t care about anyone’s feelings, is the general summary. Women aren’t to blame. Men aren’t to blame.
What IS reprehensible is the systematic lying to and gaslighting of young men by various interests to set them up for a life of misery and exploitation.
The Christians are happy to throw young men on the feminist bonfire if it means white babies.
The progressives are happy to sacrifice young men in the name of their cult and their ideal of equality.
No one gives a single fuck about young men and their lives. Just tools to be used and thrown away.
Not caring about men is also built in to our biology, sadly. As long as it is possible for one man to impregnate large numbers of women, women will always have more reproductive value, and so men will always be regarded as disposable. Human beings and human societies are programmed to think this way.
Not caring about men is also built in to our biology, sadly.
But so are our brains that allow us to realize this and react to it. Western society gave men certain perks to help make up for the expectation of dying in war, risking their lives working, etc. Marriage helped to ensure that a great number of men didn't go without mates.
When you take all of that away, you're left with beings that are not only being given a raw deal but realize that they are being given a raw deal and are more likely to turn to violence against themselves or others, which is not exactly the recipe for a healthy society. It's also why feminism and related ideologies are so concerned with emasculating "angry (white) males" and rendering them harmless so that they don't have to face the issues they are creating.
These are of course generalities, and are observing qualities of masculinity and femininity when it was more common for people to aspire to their correct gender role. There have always been more masculine women that buck the trend, but the exceptions don't disprove the rule or alter the bell curve. Unfortunately men now seem to take on the worse qualities of femininity, and women take on the worse qualities of masculinity. They put on stereotypical blackface of the other sex (trannies being the extreme example) but are incapable of reproducing the positive qualities of that sex.
You probably don't consider yourself masculine, but I bet in the eras those famous people lived you would be seen that way. The gender roles were different. And a lot of men from now would be seen as feminine back then.
He's wrong about many things, to which his betters attempt to correct him. Nevertheless, it doesn't stop him from consistently and accurately being wrong about those things ad infinitum.
Hard disagree. I have known some evil women who would plan for the long game of utterly destroying someone, clinging to the present is the entry level game.
I was mostly thinking of the 'prefer trifling matters to the most important'. That seems to be worse in women than men, though terrible in both these days.
Evolution and biology don’t care about anyone’s feelings, is the general summary. Women aren’t to blame. Men aren’t to blame.
What IS reprehensible is the systematic lying to and gaslighting of young men by various interests to set them up for a life of misery and exploitation.
The Christians are happy to throw young men on the feminist bonfire if it means white babies.
The progressives are happy to sacrifice young men in the name of their cult and their ideal of equality.
No one gives a single fuck about young men and their lives. Just tools to be used and thrown away.
Not caring about men is also built in to our biology, sadly. As long as it is possible for one man to impregnate large numbers of women, women will always have more reproductive value, and so men will always be regarded as disposable. Human beings and human societies are programmed to think this way.
But so are our brains that allow us to realize this and react to it. Western society gave men certain perks to help make up for the expectation of dying in war, risking their lives working, etc. Marriage helped to ensure that a great number of men didn't go without mates.
When you take all of that away, you're left with beings that are not only being given a raw deal but realize that they are being given a raw deal and are more likely to turn to violence against themselves or others, which is not exactly the recipe for a healthy society. It's also why feminism and related ideologies are so concerned with emasculating "angry (white) males" and rendering them harmless so that they don't have to face the issues they are creating.
It's always been this way bro.
Oy vey, it was white women of course!
These are of course generalities, and are observing qualities of masculinity and femininity when it was more common for people to aspire to their correct gender role. There have always been more masculine women that buck the trend, but the exceptions don't disprove the rule or alter the bell curve. Unfortunately men now seem to take on the worse qualities of femininity, and women take on the worse qualities of masculinity. They put on stereotypical blackface of the other sex (trannies being the extreme example) but are incapable of reproducing the positive qualities of that sex.
I mean it’s all true but I still want to put my benis inside of them.
And that is our kryptonite
Hegel was writing nonsense that gave rise to Marx, and ultimately CRT.
You probably don't consider yourself masculine, but I bet in the eras those famous people lived you would be seen that way. The gender roles were different. And a lot of men from now would be seen as feminine back then.
Literally anything written by Saint Paul.
Of these, only the one by Schopenhauer is remotely accurate, and only Aristotle was an actual wise man (Weiniger I don't know).
The Nietzsche one is entirely accurate.
No, it is extremely hyperbolic, and women have often been guardians of virtue and truth - e.g. in revolutionary France and Russia.
Found the guy Weininger is talking about.
How much work do you have to put in to be this wrong?
He's wrong about many things, to which his betters attempt to correct him. Nevertheless, it doesn't stop him from consistently and accurately being wrong about those things ad infinitum.
Hard disagree. I have known some evil women who would plan for the long game of utterly destroying someone, clinging to the present is the entry level game.
I was mostly thinking of the 'prefer trifling matters to the most important'. That seems to be worse in women than men, though terrible in both these days.
Are they trying to quell your wrath with a bunch of quotes validating your stance?
Ending statements with question marks always reinforces my suspicion that you are actually secretly a 24-year-old woman?
What?
It is a sad limitation of the English language that there is no proper way to both add a question mark to both Imp's statement and your own?
Like, do we have to use question marks? It's like, we're you know, like Californians?
See? The win! Lol