He's wrong about many things, to which his betters attempt to correct him. Nevertheless, it doesn't stop him from consistently and accurately being wrong about those things ad infinitum.
Hard disagree. I have known some evil women who would plan for the long game of utterly destroying someone, clinging to the present is the entry level game.
I was mostly thinking of the 'prefer trifling matters to the most important'. That seems to be worse in women than men, though terrible in both these days.
Of these, only the one by Schopenhauer is remotely accurate, and only Aristotle was an actual wise man (Weiniger I don't know).
The Nietzsche one is entirely accurate.
No, it is extremely hyperbolic, and women have often been guardians of virtue and truth - e.g. in revolutionary France and Russia.
Found the guy Weininger is talking about.
How much work do you have to put in to be this wrong?
He's wrong about many things, to which his betters attempt to correct him. Nevertheless, it doesn't stop him from consistently and accurately being wrong about those things ad infinitum.
Hard disagree. I have known some evil women who would plan for the long game of utterly destroying someone, clinging to the present is the entry level game.
I was mostly thinking of the 'prefer trifling matters to the most important'. That seems to be worse in women than men, though terrible in both these days.