I was reading an article on Bounding into Comics about the latest gender swap and the shill media praising it and somebody in the comments mentioned that fact that his wife had a book club where they read romance novels and how foolish he would look if he demanded to join the book club and then demand that everyone read Tom Clancy or spy/military thrillers that he likes.
It made me wonder why there is this obsessive push to get women into hobbies that generally appeal to males. I mean women have always been interested in nerdy stuff but it is absurd the levels they keep pushing it and then attacking anyone as a "manbaby" who has an objection.
I remember when I still had a game informer magazine subscription it was at least every other issue that had some story about women in gaming and of course all the "abuse" they suffered. I know women were involved with Atari as well as Sierra games and others but just because a hobby appeals to males doesn't make it bad.
When the He-Man show was announced for Netflix (which I don't believe for a minute will be a show that doesn't push the whole strong women thing) the usual suspects on twitter were complaining about how men were crying about the She-ra show so they had to make He-man and then added that girls can't have anything for themselves.
So why do you think there is this obsessive push to get girls into things that boys generally like?
I like this summary. I've known for a while that what they say isn't anywhere close to what their goal is but I guess I never landed on it being simply "dismantle". I guess it's pretty damn obvious. Maybe it's just hard to relate because even when I'm miserable and suffering I don't get the urge to drag other people down, I just want help. It's like these people are drowning and when you extend a hand to help they shove your head underwater and use your corpse to float
The key thing that incels don't understand is that women are malleable and meek.
It's why they set up such a strong front. Bitch face, shit tests, mockery, makeup, fashion, standing in groups. It's protection, they are trying to intimidate you, and make you doubt yourself, because if you get past it they are completely open.
You can just walk over to a girl and program her. When you become better and more experienced at it, you can do it in a remarkably short amount of time. It doens't matter what you look like, or what you do. It matters how you present.
Women are attracted to 10% of men, yet most of them end up married, or are in a relationship. How does that work, are they all miserable?
No, they are attracted to 10% of men based on external factors sure, but they are attracted to nearly 100% of men who make more money than them after creating an emotional bond with them, and these bonds are created quickly. And then most of them become submissive. It's all genetic - it's not going to change.
The goal of the subversion is to make men forget how to be men. Only in a world where men are fearful and brainwashed to tip toe around women and supress their own inherent benevolent yet dominating power can there ever potentially be equality of outcomes. Masculinity is a threat to them, because it's their cryptonite.
You can't have equity if men are firing on all cylinders. As u/50BMG wrote; they will fight among themselves at first to determine a merit based hierarchy, and then unify and take the fight to the external threat.
And so out of necessity, when more reasonable measures fail, they keep escalating to more and more unreasonable measure.
You start with telling men not to dominate. Then you tell boys in school. Still not working, so you need to do more than just tell them. What if you stop them from doing some stuff? Yeah, what if it's rough and tumble play that makes them this way. So you ban rough and tumble play. Then you put the message in every piece of art and entertainment. Maybe the problem is just that men can't be allowed to talk to other men, because behind closed doors they reaffirm to each other their masculinity, maybe they confirm to each other that they're not helpless and alone with their thoughts, so you ban mens clubs. Then you need to breach their new spaces and ruin those as well. Maybe if you take away their hobbies they'll have more time to sit through the indoctrination. Maybe if you control all information, and carefully make sure that they never see anything you don't want them to, they will change. And it's still not working. They're not going to stop, they are not going to give up, beucase they are acting out their genes.
All in pursuit of equity, which is a need that has its roots in the trait of neroticism. So it's not just women who push for equity, it also neurotic men, just that there are far fewer of those.
Except if made to feel more neurotic, which is the state of feeling under threat. An ideology that spreads through neuroticism, is going to optimize for more neuroticism, and push more people into neurotic states, and as it does it gets stronger.
To actually achieve equity they need blank slate theory to be correct. But it's not. So they will either lose or create a dystopia. History repeating itself.
None of this needs an organizer or a "them" btw, it's all happening organically. Our genes playing a metagame on a global scale.
Is there an evolutionary explanation for why they do this?
We know that women are high on neurotisicm from personality tests. And let's be honest here; from simple observation. Exactly why would be a combination of things and not easy to pinpoint.
Referring to u/50BMG again he mentions a few things here
Women are likely collectivists because they depend on groups to protect them, and because they for millennia were the keepers of the camp in constant social engagement with the need to maintain harmony and find indirect ways of resolving social conflict.
They are more neurotic probably because they were weaker and being attuned to anxiety and fear was likely a positive selection bias for most of history. Survival depended on seeking the protection of others, and things in the world like human or animal predators were a much bigger and more constant risk to them.
They are more risk averse for similar reasons. And more forgiving and submissive towards the in-group, and ruthless and passive-agressive towards the out-group.
They have always carried the flames of whatever ideology is dominant - it's what you would expect neurotic people to do; huddle together and embrace the groupthink for added feelings of protection.
Equity is just an extention of that. The promise of finally being able to shed that fear in a world where everyone is safe and equal - not reaalizing that the fear is screaming at them from their genes, not from society which is the safest it has ever been, and where they are already massively provledged.
This is so true - we constantly hear we live in a “rape culture” - yet by comparison to every country that exists and has ever existed they are far safer than ever.
(rape culture does exist - it is systematically condoned by society in male prisons)
It's at least partly driven by their zero-sum view of the world.
Because they just about worship equity, they've taken a mindset whereby taking something away from a person is the same as giving everybody else that something. That, combined with the hegemonic, totalitarian view of the world that's very common, means that there's a two-fold drive to make every activity about their religion - and simply remove any men's spaces because it's something women don't have.
I like this comment. I would add that destruction is plan 1A. Conversion is plan 1B. If they can make the space work for them, they will use it. If not, they will burn it down and move on.
Sadism.
They enjoy kicking you out of what you love, it’s not about getting them in, it’s about taking over.
The more cynical among us may connect this to the idea that men are more likely to pursue relationships if they have nothing more useful to do.
Maybe autism really is the next stage of evolution, and it appeared to give men the power to completely ignore and disregard women's attempt to socially manipulate them.
autists being manipulated into becoming trannies, might disagree.
I understand women have evolved to get things by “getting a man to give them to her”.
Do women really want to destroy Grogg and Ugg’s private spaces? Or do they merely want to take from Grogg and Ugg?
I would love a link and maybe some books on the subject
Feminists are jealous of men and want to be more like men, and now this has become mainstream culture. Unfortunately for them, the more you are able to do what men do , the more you become a man, and "woman" means less and less every year. It's like they're self-destructing (leftist women i mean)
They aren't jealous of men. They are furious at the universe for the injustice of burdening them with a woman's body and mind that is inferior to a man's in every measurable physical and mental activity.
The only thing that the average woman is better at than the average man is social and emotional manipulation. And that "strength" can't be leveraged if men have any social outlets that don't involve interacting with women.
That sounds like jealousy.
Also we shouldn't understate what women do better, which is obviously motherhood, birthing and raising children. That by itself weighs as much as everything a man can do. Healthy societies understand this by allowing for the "gender roles" to be what they are, with girls being feminine and boys being masculine, with all their respective characteristics. Destroying these roles is basically not appreciating what women have to offer, and this is now having serious consequences throughout western society.
It's part of the whole woke narrative you see in all the ads nowadays, and in school curriculums, corporate 'diversity' mantras, etc... "Girls are STRONG and can do ANYTHING and men are TOXIC" blablabla... it's everywhere.
It’s never been about equality or inclusion, it’s always been about revenge.
But revenge for what? That guys enjoy something?
Jordan Peterson's analysis of Caine and Abel is really enlightening and worth the reading length: https://www.jordanbpeterson.com/transcripts/biblical-series-v/
The wokists are scions of Caine whose fear of making the necessary sacrifices leads to failure. But they can't admit that the failure is their own fault because that requires introspection and taking responsibility. So they blame the successful and that resentment festers until they are left bereft of joy and acting only out of spite and self pity.
I mean it’s more in the cultural sense of “this is something made by and made for the men that have held us back and oppressed us all throughout history”
It represents the warped view of white men and western history in general to these people, so by subverting it and filling it full of their dogshit politics and making characters gay or race-swapping them for no reason it gives them a kind of small victory, they’ve hurt this enemy that’s been conjured up for them by Marxism.
They don’t care about creating a good black character or getting a role or more representation for a gay actor, their primary focus is in ruining something.
Yes... women, particularly those in an ostensibly monogamous relationship, consider the man to be her property and all of the man's resources, time, energy and attention to be hers. If a man has any happiness or enjoyment that isn't of a direct benefit to her then he is in effect "stealing" from her.
You’ll want to read about the Frankfurt school.
Actually it's looking more and more like He-Man will be completely sidelined (or killed off) in that new reboot, and replaced with Teela as the main character. Echoing almost exactly the path of recent woke properties like Last of Us 2 and Terminator 6.
https://cosmicbook.news/he-man-fraud-kevin-smith-lies-fan-teela
Before the title Revelation it was going to be called The End of the Universe.... In a series called Masters of the Universe...
Where the titular character is considered the last one. And a clown world where Master is a verboten word and womink stronk.
Power and Control
The longer this goes on and the more industries it infects, the more and more it looks like a Communist / Socialist divide and conquer strategy aimed at subversion and destruction. They dont actually want equal representation in male dominated industries/hobbies/fandoms, they just want to remove the male domination of that industry/hobby/fandom. If men are allowed to remain intrenched in their communities they will unify under an established hierarchy. This is the enemy of Progressive / Leftist ways of thinking.
Read up on Queer Theory.
https://newdiscourses.com/tftw-queer-theory/
Fucking with the gender of characters is seen as disrupting "normal society".
And a disruption of normal society is one of the major pieces that need to be in place for either a communist revolution or a covert takeover by a foreign power
Honesty? Women want everything revolving around them, they want each and every medium focused on pleasing them. Look at the current simp culture, men must pay extravagant prices just to lick the heels of women.
It took us WAY too long to realize that no complaints about "inclusivity, representation, diversity" are legitimate.
All of it is anti male, anti white, anti christian, anti western civilization. Notice how there are never any complaints against mostly black, women, muslim or jewish institutions.
THE CHURCH OF WOKE
"Just like any other church we believe that blasphemous ideas that cause dissent to our cause should be removed"
"As other religions in the past have gained control of the printing press to stop the spread of 'misinformation' we've seized control of the social media platform"
"Some churches say everyone's a sinner, we say everyone's a bigot"
"Right now we're working on having our beliefs intertwined with the state, getting our teachings into schools, workplaces, the rule of law. Sort of the unification of the state and the church of woke."
"One day I'd love to have one of those superchurches where the guy where you can smash all the girls, those guys are Livin'"
They need to have an enemy, and they need to villify the enemy and pretend their quest for power is just defending themselves.
The US made up a story about the north vietnemese navy attacking them as an excuse to invade vietnam.
The Nazi's fabricated a story of how poland was invading germany as an excuse to invade poland and start ww2.
Feminists create fictional stories of women being "oppressed" as an excuse to oppress and control men.
Most men these days are Simps and Beta's who cannot for the life of them tell a woman no so when a woman enters a space gets catered to and almost everything changes.....I blame 2000s sitcoms pushing the shew married to the feckless Beta dolt who's a yes man in every aspect and has the IQ of a warm olive for pushing men to be more "yay sports! drink beer! kiss wifes ass!" even Homer Simpson wasn't this bad.
Yep.. women want into a boys club because its cool. Once they get in, they inject their bullshit into the club and change it. The club becomes lame.
I'm going to recite some phrases for you:
"I am the Woke thy god, thou shalt have no other gods before me."
"My name is Jealous, for I am a Jealous God."
"Wherefore thus saith the Lord Woke; Behold, I am against your pillows"
The issue isn't a push to invade spaces. The issue is that Woke, their god, demands first and fullmost respect no matter how unwarrented, and anyone doing things outside the Name of Woke besmirch it. If you have pillows that are not according to the creed, behold, the Lord Woke is against it. They look upon spaces where people are happy, where people are equal and treated fairly, and writhe in hatred, for their lord Woke demands unhappiness and segregation. It is not enough that they have their own spaces and powers, powers which dominate the planet, but that they also ensure no one ELSE has any spaces. Their jealous god demands no other gods before Woke not in the "before" sense of being higher on the totem pole, but as in none being brought into its detection radius. Don't bring that non-Woke joy before this altar of hateful Wokism!
(Yes, I know these are bible verses, I'm having some fun with it, and yes, I'm fully aware that the pillows in that particular verse reference a witch's evil cursed bangles and symbols upon them, not the fact pillows themselves exist.)
Women have been the weak link since the garden of Eden. They are perfect for subversives to manipulate.
"You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink."
Beyond any other considerations or nefarious bullshit, there simply are people who think they know what's good for the horse better than the horse does, and will either force a funnel down' the horse's throat, or worse, cut his head off for spite and throw it in the water.
Remove those "males" who might innovate, defy and disagree and replace all levels of culture with social justice minded, submissive agreeable women who will do the bidding of the marxists
I think the basic idea is that anything that's enjoyed mostly by men promotes "toxic masculinity" and must be altered. You don't have a similar push to get men into things with a largely female audience because they don't recognize the existence of "toxic femininity".
The molten core of any argument by the left is that you're either on board with what they want or you're an "ist", "phobe", or "anti-".
We're just now having to integrate a generation of people who were raised on time-outs, feelings, and labels into adulthood, with social media backing all of that baggage up so they'll never grow out of it.
So now, threaten any one of them with being branded with a label and you may as well be pointing a gun at them. Once they have them all in step, trained and ready to jump on virtually anything they're directed to out of fear, they'll point that gun at us.
Jews. Specifically Sabbatean Frankists. I will be banned for telling you the truth.
Or maybe you just like to hint like coward