Full disclosure: as a Christian I believe the bible speaks against homosexuality (along with thousands of other sins) and that there are two genders. That being said, I am a firm believer that people should live how the please as long as they are not hurting anyone and if an adult wants to "change their gender" more power to them. I'll support your right to live how you want, and I hope they can respect my right to worship how I choose.
The other day I saw a commercial with a black "transwoman" talking about how when he was growing up he didn't see anyone that represented him. I almost started screaming at the TV. There is a very tiny amount of men who have gender dysphoria, and black men with gender dysphoria is an even smaller number. He was talking about how he wanted to make movies and I rolled my eyes because I am sure he will win an oscar someday by making some garbage movie that the critics will gush over.
Why do you think there seems to be an agenda to make it seem like LGBT people make up a large portion of the population? Of course anyone who asks this question gets told "gay people exist" or something about how heterosexuals shove their "heteronormative" lifestyle down everyone's throats. No point in responding to it because they will just screech louder if I say heterosexuality is the norm.
And of course with the representation comes the overhype like you see if there is a female, black, or hispanic person in a movie or TV Show. I can remember seeing articles about that one lady on Stranger Things who is a lesbian talking about how she was the best character in the whole series and to me that made no sense for a show paying homage to the 80s with a reformed jock and the nerdy girl, but gotta subvert expectations. Or the San Junipero episode of Black Mirror. The episode about ranking people via social media was a much better look at our society and raised some interesting questions but of course San Junipero was treated like the second coming of Citizen Kane.
So why do you think there is so much over-representation? I also saw a poll about LGBT being very high in younger groups but I have to believe at least some of that is due to being trendy and a lot of women who are married to men seem to love to say they are queer.
Like I said there are gay people who have the "don't bother me and I won't bother you" mentality. I'm mainly referring to the radical movement that considers it oppression if you don't enthusiastically celebrate and affirm their lifestyle.
They want weak men, there used to be a time when strength and proper understanding of our masculine nature was cultivated to make strong men and a responsible society. This push is to make weak men, women will throw any term on themselves to meet the woke standards because they are already submissive. I’ve fucked enough “pansexuals” to know they’re 100% straight but act like the one time they kissed a girl drunk makes them bi or pan.
You're right, but it goes beyond that. The only constant, out of every decision, edict, program, tax, politician, welfare, news article, education, media, TV, corporate takeover, poisoning of food and water, censor, manipulation, perversion, philosophy, lie, averages and undercurrents, of everything the globalists do, is to accomplish one thing: make us easier to control.
Ha! So true. And the way toxic masculinity is thrown around to describe basics masculine traits is disturbing.
I saw a thomas sowell video where he talked about how hundreds or thousands of years ago middle eastern aristocracy liked slaves but particularly liked eunich (men with their junk cut off) slaves.
It was illegal to do this to a slave but of course this didn't stop them, slave traders would buy a slave, move him out of the country, amputate his genitals off. If he survived (I think it was about a 50% rate) they'd bring him back and sell him for a high price.
This seems to be what's going on. Modern society switching to the female model where you don't force someone yourself, you emotionally gaslight and abuse them until they do it to themselves.
Western society has emasculated men. I think this is partly, or mostly, due to women using their voting rights to replace the traditional role of man (protector and provider) with government. Women, under the guise of female empowerment and "not needing a man", has replaced men with the greatest masculine entity on the planet: government. Granted, government is a poor imitation, and completely devoid of care or thought with regard to truth, consequence of action, or people affected, but women vote for this shit with great consistency nonetheless, and then bitch about "where have all the good men gone". Well, they were replaced by government. This has a lot of ancillary effects, like reducing the individual drive of each woman to seek out a man, because they've reduced the need, which then reduces the number of marriages, increases the number of divorces, increases one night stands, reduces the number of children, increases porn use by men, the number of women willing to do porn, increases antagonism of each sex against each other, increases the number of men dropping out of society, which increases the number of gamers among men, and on, and on, and on. Major missteps can result in catastrophe.
Keep in mind, however, that women weren't the driving force of this. Women were just easier to manipulate than men were, to do what the globalists wanted us to do. Women are emotional and less logical beings by their nature, thus, women are easier to manipulate and control.
This is also brought on as a consequence of our success, because as we improve as a society, we become more wealthy, invent more things, and put bigger and bigger barriers between ourselves and nature, which prevents us from being taught by nature, passing down what we learned, and keeping our hard won traditions of what works and what doesn't by nature. Nature kills off the stupid quite quickly and rewards the intelligent with life and offspring (continuance). Our society isn't continuing, it's degrading toward destruction, because of (in part) due to above reasons.
Well written, you bring up an interesting idea though.
What is the goal of all these narratives is actually to reproduce the "only the genetically strong reproduce" system?
The effect of "trans" is to sterilize the person - they get their baby making parts amputated or redone in a way that prevents them from creating children that pass on their genetics. I've read some say the "trans" narrative is especially influential on autistic people. What if that's deliberate? If your autism makes you unable to recognize dangerous social narratives your genes get removed from the gene pool after you sterliize yourself.
I've heard others mention this idea as well, and thought of it myself. I just don't think it's true.
What's happening to us has happened to past people's as well, to varying degree. It's a predictable consequence of a combination of factors and forces. Strong communities and societies inhibit the growth of cancerous (self destructive) ideologies, philosophies, and practices, across all areas and in every scale, and inhibit the infestation of parasites who would use, manipulate, and pervert the system and the people for their own ends, at the expense of the people, usually by pushing these cancerous things.
It seems much more likely that the things being done to us are just to make us weaker and easier control. Mass manipulation of genetics is just an unintended consequence of some of their actions. As an example, if the evil string pullers' intention was mass eugenics, then they wouldn't implement mass dysgenics programs like welfare, which takes resources from the most intelligent/productive (meaning they have less kids), and give them to the least intelligent/productive (meaning they have more kids). Also, note that the string pullers aren't altruistic, which is what they'd have to be if they were mass manipulating our genetics for our benefit. Lastly, if they are doing it, but are so stupid that they're doing it this badly, it also precludes that they've thoroughly planned this all out (because they're stupid). There are too many contradictions to make it seem plausible that they're doing all this for eugenics purposes.
Don't ever forget the string pullers are evil, which is continually proven with everything they say and do. They're evil because they've abandoned truth to pursue their own power. Because of this, the fruits of the labor always inevitably spoil, which explains all the unintended consequences of their evil pursuits. The people at the top may be smart to have attained this much power, but they're not wise, because if they were they'd realize what they're doing is ultimately always self destructive, and that every individual, community, and society that is ruled by them, and follows their philosophies destroys itself.
They weren't manipulated. Don't talk utter bullshit.
Most women were manipulated into it. It doesn't mean their motivations affected what they did and what they're doing. If women were logical and doing this to gain powers they should be happier, but they're not. Women are unhappier now than they've ever been.
Self reporting is garbage. Why would you trust them claiming to be unhappy?
Are you saying that half of all women are on some sort of psychoactive chemicals and spend a fortune on mental help, nevermid that they're clearly visibly regressed and miserable, as a sneaky way to throw off some statistics?
If women were actually happy that fact would be pushed non-stop as the biggest success of the modern world. You'd never hear the end of it. It would be used as the leading argument that we're doing everything right, and should push forth towards utopia. See it's working!
But it's not working. Governing in the face of nature never works.
You need to amend your worldview to one that allows for women to be near constant mental anguish, because they are and you don't need a survey to see that.
We're talking about two generations of women who have been told their whole lives that they are special and can do anything and are better than everyone else and as a consequence have become entitled beyond belief, spoiled, cocky, perma-teen, borderline alcoholic, dysfunctional, useful idiots to an ideology that pushes them against their own biology.
They're extremely loney, they don't get along with each other and constantly gossip and backstab, constantly feeling isolated and anxious. Their main social outlet is in activist and online groups where they do little else but consume misery porn and egg eachother on to ever increasing levels of mental and emotional pain until all they can feel anymore is resentment and hatred and suffering.
They can't find a husband and they're annoyed that there aren't lines of mature men waiting in line to love, cuddle, and support mentally unstable, incompetent, scrambled-egg burning, phone addicted, hedonistic anti-men and anti-reality feminists who wear pyjamas in public because they can't for a second leave their plushy comfort zones, who live in a permanent fantasy world of magic and vampires and dragons and decorate their environments like they're still 16 while permanently in a state of dysfunctional anxiety and anger because of the state of the world which they are doing absolutely nothing to improve besides virtue signaling on social media.
They expect everything to land on their laps. Take the bare minimum steps to develop anything about themselves beyond their appearance, and take pride in sipping $14 cofees and wearing $140 worth of makeup while going on tinder dates to eat cause they can't afford food.
Who in lucid moments of reflection realize that hookup culture is making them extremely unhappy and powerless subjects to the 5% of pretty men who are the only people to benefit from the new sexual marketplace and degenerate norms, and because of that success have become even more entitled and insuffrable than the hudreds of women they date per week. But yet women continue to engage in hookup culture because it's their source of social verification and the one metric they use to judge each others success and social status.
This whole rant has an air of the "Concentration camp guards were the real victims of the Holocaust" level of tone deafness and inaccuracy.
They use them to get high for pleasure. Years of feminist pressure means that they can't be questioned when asking for these things without the doctor getting in trouble.
Based on what? Self-reports? Their suicide rate shows this is bullshit.
Not exactly. The statistics are massaged data to favor what the feminist narrative wants.
Them being happy would be proof the "fight for equality" has reached the conclusion. Why on earth would they want to end the movement that has given their sadistic tendencies more power than ever should have been allowed?
"Women are the real victims of female supremacists" - are you for real?
They already believed this. It's innate. There was a study confirming that women believe their group (women) to be better than everyone by default and have to actively fight this impulse. (Hence the unconscious bias push - projection!)
They get along perfectly well when they're destroying men's lives. Ask anyone who had them take over a workplace they were in.
Tradcuck fantasy detected. All they want is your money.
Because it does. Always. Because people can't just accept we are in a cold war and start actively working to limit their gains.
You don't know much about biology. All women want a top 10% man to impregnate them and the rest discarded or reduced to slaves.
Literally impossible. No one can be more entitled than a woman. They're the experts.
Just because we live in a gynocentric society doesn't mean that women are happy.
Just because women are unhappy doesn't mean that men aren't disadvantaged.
Just because modern culture is making everyone unhappy doesn't mean it's making everyone equally unhappy.
Just because women are unhappy it does't mean they're the "real victims".
You can be unhappy without being suicidal.
There is no reason to believe they would back down from equity if they were happy. IMO they'd just push harder because it was making them happier.
"All they want is your money" is false. They want to be 16 forever - they want money and a caretaker.
And just because they can collude to achive some goal doesn't mean that they are friends or aren't lonely.
I base my views on self reported surveys sure, but also on how many are on therapy or on drugs (and ssri's don't make you high). And on observing them irl and online. If you visit r/twoxchromosomes you feel like you walked into a group of happy people?
That was a lot of words you put in my mouth, and a lot of conclusions jumped to. Honestly I don't see the point of being this antagonistic.
At least half of all women now also have a mental health problem. Do you really think women are some pinnacle of dastardly malicious planning? They're emotional and illogical by their nature, which makes them terrible leaders and planners.
Their mental health problems are just fake to get pills. I knew a lot of girls who did that.
Do you think they're just passengers in an agenda that favors them more than anything?
I wouldn't use the term "passengers" to describe the role of women in our destruction. I would use the term directed. Women's natural tendencies toward empathy, emotion, and illogic is being manipulated and directed, to make women think, say, and do what the manipulators want them to. As I said, by their very nature, women are much easier to manipulate and control than men. This explains the crucial role of feminism in the downfall of civilization and the string puller's plans to control us. This also explains voting patterns, social media use, virtue signaling, gender make-up of certain movements, changing core societal philosophies like truth over life to life over truth (a somewhat complicated subject), relativism over absolutism, hedonism over self improvement, feelings over logic, increased welfare use, increased taxes, increased size of government, lower marriage rates, higher divorce rates, ads increasingly being targeted toward women, lower birth rates, increased antagonism between the sexes, increased pre marital sex partners, increased abortion rates, the dynamics of the modern dating market (the top 80% of women pursuing the top 20% of men, i.e. harems), etc. There are some men susceptible to the brainwashing, but not nearly as many as women.
You seem to have this unquenchable hatred of women that I think goes beyond proper explanation of this subject. Let blame be laid proper and accurate, but don't go beyond it. Our side is the one that prioritizes truth above all else. It is folly to let our feelings get in the way (I'm assuming here), or to not be as accurate and truthful as possible, both in defining the problem, how we got here, and how to fix it.
This was a particularly gruesome enslavement that was carried out until the British and American navy and economic forces stopped it. There was a less than ten percent survival rate and was often done on land journeys of over 600 miles. It didn’t end until the 19th century, coincidentally the same time that the Islamic countries stopped enslavement of whites (Slavs). We never talk about the atrocities that the Middle East carried out in slavery and instead focused on chattel slavery. What’s funny, is this framing is intentional but the blacks enslaved by the Middle East don’t exist anymore because they weren’t allowed to breed except in very rare circumstances.
Going to go with a different thought route than the others here:
It's a positive feedback loop of power.
Let's say you suck at acting, and your blowjob skills are only meh at best, so you don't get big roles like the ones who suck in the right way. How are you to succeed? You see a cult fetishizing weakness, so much so that it inverts the stack: The most horrifically mangled and fucked-up in the head person gets a throne and prizes. Well, you can't change much, but you CAN change what you say. You're an actor: you're already whoring yourself out to producers and directors regardless of gender. AND as an actor, you're used to pretending to be something you're not.
So now you're bidemiqueeracrosexual. And it's really oppressing you. So you get scads of attention from the cult. Actors with attention get jobs. You then represent the self-destruction cult, increasing their own reach and power. Leading to more actors leaning into the cult's ideologies in order to bypass their lack of ability to suck properly as well.
As soon as there's no profit in it, either in the form of market saturation and stability, or in the form of complete collapse, you'll see the feedback loop burst, and the over-representation would cease. But until that point, it is a mutually beneficial symbiotic relationship: The actor raises social power for the cult, and the cult raises star power for the actor.
There was never any profit in it. If you actually look at the finances of companies jettisoning their own main demographic for the Rainbow Reich, they haven't been profiting. Not one game company is moving more product now than before by adding more gays to their games. Not one comic book brand retconning their characters to being gay have profited more now than before. None of the movies pushing this stuff does better at the box office than comparative films without the nonsense.
You're absolutely right that part of this is about a feedback loop of power; absolutely. But that's just part of it.
As others mentioned above, this is also about promoting a message -- a unified message. It's identical to all those companies who came out in support of BLM in 2020 even while BLM were burning down and looting their stores and costing them billions of dollars; there was zero profit in that yet those companies kept pushing the message, kept promoting the vandalism and looting. I believe it was Sony who even made a daft tweet about how you could rebuild stores but not lives.
No for-profit corporation who actually cared about money would gleefully sign off on millions of dollars worth of their own merchandise being destroyed by looters so they could virtue signal to several thousand mentally ill people on Twitter with only net losses to gain.
There is profit for it. Just not for those particular corporations.
Much like there is profit for a mosquito sucking your blood. To the mosquito. A horsefly biting off a chunk of your flesh. To the horsefly. But a swarm of them kills the horse, and then they briefly thrive, but their food gone, they die off.
The company is failing. But the people are not. They just keep getting promoted upwards. A diversity consultant for a failed company can easily find work at any other company, yelling "racism" the whole way.
A Theoretical Entity makes a shit CYOA, and gets accolades from the propagandists. The game fails, the company fails. But SHE then gets to go on to consulting on a new big name video game company project. Which fails. But SHE then becomes a top writer for Marvel. And the propagandists always have something to write about. The parasite and the propagandist both profit off the arrangement, even if each host suffers.
If you look at it from the perspective that the employee, even if the employee happens to be a C-suite, is a parasite aiming to make a quick buck and either retire or golden trampoline up to a new spot, it does work.
You're right in that regard.
From the individualist perspective, opportunists are absolutely profiting at the expense of the host (i.e., the corporation(s)). But for people still claiming the corporations profit as a whole? No... they aren't.
According to Gallup, the majority of Americans think that over 20% of the U.S. population is LGBT. It could be that writers are among those who overestimate. The fact that most of them live in either New York or California, both with higher than average LGBT levels would further skew their perception.
It's worth noting that people overestimated their number across the political spectrum: liberal, independent, and conservative.
Interesting. I didn’t know the overestimation crossed the political spectrum
Yeah that's because they're over-represented in media by an incomprehensibly large figure. GLAAD did a report on it here, and they want to increase that figure even more: https://web.archive.org/web/20200904195027/https://www.glaad.org/blog/glaads-where-we-are-tv-report-shows-tv-telling-more-lgbtq-stories-ever
They want 20% of all on-screen characters portrayed in media to be part of the alphabet soup by 2025, despite the fact that gays and lesbians only make up 1.6% of the population, according to the CDC: https://archive.is/AtuDc
People are starting to fight back. That's why.
While I would like to agree, I think this isn't 100% accurate. People have always fought back and resisted, but there weren't enough people, or enough resistance, to overcome what the globalists were doing. What I do agree on is that there are lot more people fighting back, and resisting much more, than people used to. With no other factors or forces involved, this resistance is going to steadily increase, because the insanity is increasing, which wakes up more people and makes them more inclined to resist and resist in greater means. Just keep in mind there are counter forces at play, which must be considered and accounted for.
How so? I guess one way would be the polls showing a drop in LGBT support which I can only attribute to people tired of seeing it everywhere
A. It’s trendy, especially amongst the youth because of how hard the media pushes it. None of them wants to be seen as bigoted. I’ve known teens who were molested by LBGT but stayed silent because they didn’t want to offend anyone.
B. We’re not fighting people, we’re fighting their demons and the Devil’s only gotten sneakier as time goes on. He’ll use whatever tools necessary to drive people away from God. The LBGT movement is one of his biggest successes to date. The Devil made a sin into a pseudo-religion, lifestyle, and tool for other sins. Why would he not want to continue to promote it?
Of course, I’ve known a couple in my life and I’m still friends with a bisexual man. The problem is these minds are a minority of a minority in terms of public discourse. Some of those also still do support the radicals because “it’s better than nothing”, which is like saying giving yourself cancer is a good thing.
This is the attitude that causes the fall into immorality. By accepting sin (which is just behavior that is socially destructive), self-control is lost, and people without self control are unworthy and incapable of the responsibilities of liberty.
Which is why moral destruction is a great way to gain control over people.
I’ve heard that criticism of the live and let live viewpoint but in a free society not much else you can do.
Not at all. In a truly free society, we have the liberty in the social arena to stigmatize and ostracize the worst aspects of society, and discourage their proliferation. We've largely lost that liberty, in the name of government mandated "equality".
Here's the problem: the people pushing this shit are using the social arena to stigmatize and ostracize what they believe are the worst aspects of society. They just disagree on what the worst aspects of society are.
Yes, but the problem is that liberty is only suitable for a moral people, and we've long since fallen into immorality. It does give some tools for a people to preserve their morality (which have been severely curtailed), but it does nothing inherently to establish it.
It seems only centuries of theocracy can do that.
Take your pick:
Depopulation agenda. More gays and trannies = less plebs reproducing.
Big Pharma. Trannies are lifelong customers of pharmaceuticals, plus multiple surgeries ($$$).
Weaken and emasculate men. Already explained in previous comments.
Psychological warfare meant to break everyone else down. "That man is a woman" is the 2020s version of "2+2=5." This quote explains it better than I can:
You hit the nail on the head on every point.
You could also add to the list, the eventual removal of Christianity from society. The Rainbow Reich is diametrically opposed to Christianity. And since they've already infiltrated and perverted Catholicism, it's no longer a problem for them. Even the Pope supports the globohomo agenda.
Islam isn't big enough in the West to destroy them (yet) so the last roadblock is to get the remaining Christians out of the way who haven't kowtowed to the Rainbow Reich's degenerate agenda.
Communism. Promote LGBT to get rid of the traditional family and indoctrinate the kids which makes subversion easier then line the LGBT against the wall for being degenerate fags. You lose nothing.
Largely, Die Hard villains are hyper-accurate to real-life agendas. Despite all the talk in the world, when push comes to shove, very few idealogues even exist at the highest echelons. It's really just about money. Most of the time, whatever is being done, is fundamentally for money, for power to get said money, and then ideology is back-rationalized for said power, to get said money.
The social justice rackets are controlled by individual narcissists and sociopaths. Those sociopaths and narcs when create a supply of people who orbit around them to fulfill their desires. The rackets will then defend each other as is required to maintain the power of one narcissist or another to maintain the overall syndicate.
The way that each racket attracts orbiters is to promise power and influence through corruption and cronyism. As such, each individual orbital can be placed in a position of power and protected by the racket as a reward for loyalty. Now you can't just force people to pay your orbitals extra money because they are loyal to you, you need a scam to sell the orbitals.
This is where identity politics comes into play. See, diversity initiatives are primarily aimed at industries were some group has chosen not to participate already, making any effort to integrate that group very difficult. So, if you pressure the industry to make quotas and initiatives for the identity categories of your orbitals, you can then sell your orbitals to that industry at a very high rate.
For example, let's say you have an orbital that needs a job, and can be used to help subvert an industry. She's a straight white woman. At first, that may not look niche enough, but the truth is, there's not many disabled, black, queer, transgender, furries to sell, and their not supremely useful to your agenda anyway. So, lets get your white bitch a job. Let's choose an industry where there will NEVER be enough competition from other women to disrupt your racket: Construction. She doesn't know shit about construction? Doesn't matter, use your sources in media and the professional industry to claim there's a toxic masculinity crisis in Landscaping. Tell a weak willed company you'll call of the dogs if they institute a diversity initiative. They agree. Now, she doesn't want to work too hard, so she'll be a diversity trainer. That way, she can use her power to get more of your orbitals in, making the company more captive to your efforts should you decide to expand the racket. Because you've put enough pressure on the industry that there must be a high demand for her, but there is never going to be enough of a supply for women in Landscaping, she will always command a high salary. A salary that she knows you paid for.
This is the objective: orbitals getting make-work jobs that contribute nothing, but siphon money out of society. There is no demand for 50% of all roles in acting to be LGBTQ2IA+, but you have more than a few gay-identified orbitals, so you'll need to construct a position for them. Use one of your writer orbitals to propose a show for all your other orbitals to be on, and your orbital PR firm will say it's a great idea.
Does it matter if your orbitals are actually gay? Fuck no. Say your gay, wear pink, call it a diverse position. Same thing with trans-trenders. Would you wear a wig and call yourself Susan to be paid $145,000 a year and work 20 hours a week to rationalize why black coffee is racist? Many would.
It's all a fraud. All of it. Every part of it. Every word, every glance, every breath. All of it without exception is a fraud. Yes there are plenty of nefarious activists in positions of power expanding the racket, but even most of the racketeers don't give a shit.
This fraud is a giant bubble that will eventually explode because the expansion of these make work schemes will go so far that the whole system will face a cascade failure and implode on itself.
Eventually, when it collapses, you might be surprised by the sudden honesty.
Mohammed Al-Douri , Iraq's Ambassador to the UN after the US military announced the capture of Baghdad
This is Anita Sarkeesian's game but taken to the extreme. It all makes her sound like a chump. What kinds of people are the major players and how did they get where they are?
I think your analysis misses out on a lot of mentally ill people programmed by a mentally ill culture that enable this whole thing. I don't know if they are the orbitals or just useful idiots for PR.
No no, I factor that in, I just didn't go into detail about it.
They syndicate is responsible for the largest psychological and emotional abuse system that anyone has ever seen. Mostly involving the abuse of culture, media, academia, diversity programs at your job, and social media to push the psychological abuse that promotes de-individuation, catastrophization, love-bombing, hate-bombing, gaslighting, and much more.
Within the syndicate, each racket is typically run by someone with sociopathic tendencies, narcissistic tendencies, or both. The system promotes these people into leadership positions because they thrive in environments that foster emotional and psychological abuse, because it's their primary environment.
The mental illness of the culture is the purpose of the syndicate to ensure loyalty to each racket. Each racket is lead by the narcissists and sociopaths who are effectively predating upon all of their useful idiots and orbiters. These predators require their orbiters to feed their supply of affirmation, sadism, and more.
The mental illness of the culture is the result of psychological conditioning of the culture to accept fundamentally pathological behaviors that only predators promote or engage in. They are making people mentally ill on purpose. This is why we see people destroying beauty in themselves as they become more ideologically possessed by social justice. The beauty of these victims was a threat to the local racket's predators who were threatened by the social power of beauty, and are enjoying watching their willing victims degrade and humiliate themselves for the sadism of the predators who can now rest assured that their narcissism has been affirmed.
That is basically the short of it. Sorry if it's a bit confused, it's a lot to try an sum up.
see the problem with "don't bother me and i don't bother you" is that's how we go here in the first place. the whole being gay thing led to trans. don't ask me how
Also I always laugh about calls for representation, that is something only immature children need that they eventually grow out of. It's not something to lament not having.
The message is simple: Don't have kids.
Women fetishize homosexual men, so they appear quite a lot in shows targeting women. This is for reasons that I don't really understand, and the best explanation I can offer is the one mentioned in South Park, where it's said that it's just a thing that they like.
On the flip side, gays have no interest in lesbian shows, neither do straight men, unless the show contains attractive women. These just exist as a kind of middle finger to men, because (outside of porn) lesbianism is all about hating men. It's more of a hatred fetish than a sexuality.
As for transgenders...they're the top virtue signal (no, this doesn't mean they're most powerful), so they're trendy right now.
I think I explained it the best way I could.
I'm leaning towards the various manifestations of human psychology we see creating this trend only being a symptom of humans under the influence of spiritual warfare.
The world they aim to create is something your religion is diametrically opposed to, whether you are personally tolerant or not. Christianity will no longer exist except as an inept cult followed by a minority. That is the goal.
Maybe that's an over-simplification, and I'm not trying to wash my hands of responsibility. There are certainly things that can be done to oppose them on a secular level, at least temporarily.
Its simple. They think society is the only reason heterosexual is the norm.
However, they can't use it as an argument because its a tacit admission that they are not born that way. Hence the screeching.
They know they were recruited and if they could only recruit more they would outnumber heterosexuals.
The shitty thing is they might be right. People are stupid and love being trendy.
Now, apply that last sentence to race and take a wild guess which one has the highest percent of gays. Its working.
It's about subverting entire generations.
Kids growing up with all this globohomo degeneracy being forced into everyone's face everywhere will affect how a lot of kids grow up to accept degeneracy, especially if they don't have parents to chide them away from that nonsense or to guide them on a proper path.
If you co-opt an entire generation to be convinced that they're gay/lesbian/etc., whatever, you have a compliant generation of people subsumed under the broader agenda to keep plebeians disconnected, disjointed, disparate, and divisive.
If men are no longer masculine, they can't raise kids properly. If women are no longer feminine, they can no longer raise kids properly. If both men and women are no longer being socially constructive to embody their gender roles, then kids are left to be raised by the state, and that leads to the next step: legalizing pedophilia.
Over the course of the next decade you'll see the push from the Rainbow Reich to push the transgender stuff for kids, and then they'll eventually try to promote that kids can consent, and then don't be surprised if they add the 'P' back into the LGBTQIA+ alphabet train at some point in the future, just like it was normalized by NAMBLA before it was curtailed in the 90s.
Women can't raise kids properly anyway, haven't you seen the infanticide rate?
I can tell you from personal experience in high school and pattern recognition :
For starters, you'll come across a disproportionate % of gay men in the arts. Music, dance, theater, etc. This was the case even when homosexuality was illegal. They just stayed in the closet. There was no "gay agenda to infiltrate". The brain development causes of homosexuality and made gay men more inclined for those interests.
This gives "media visibility" to people who have a totally skewed perception lf the % of homosexuals in the general population.
It made a feedback loop with the change from "we don't talk about that" to "it's okay, tolerance yay" to "CELEBRATE ME BIGOT".
Sprinkle Academia Grievance Studies and SJWs on top of that, and you get the current lunacy.
It's a very old strategy. Divide and conquer. A house divided can not stand.
The key for the wealthy / ruling class to stay in power is to divide the populous. So they try to sow division as frequently as possible. So it's beneficial to emphasize as many different groupings as possible and make their relatively minor issues seem like big deals.
Well when you put it that way. I see that but in a free society we can’t force people to live a certain way. But it does seem there has been a deterioration
Oh. I see what you mean
Yep. I ignored the many Facebook ads until I got fed up and responded that I don’t care if an adult male wants to cut off his penis if that makes him happy but I draw the line at demanding everyone change language that has been around for a very long time or demanding that I accept their reality. What do you care what I think. I got a lot of hate messages. I learned after that how block certain ads.
I think there is deeper spiritual stuff to it...
but for a more surface answer. It is literally fashion and power + a place for people with no community to suddenly have one and feel as a part of something. But mostly it is fashion.
Well. You didn't bitch when in the 80's they turned TV into the 24/7 All Niggers All the Time box so why are you bitching now?
I’m black but if it makes you feel better as a kid in the 80s I watched a ton of Mr Ed and Patty Duke reruns on Nick at Nite. Still watch a ton of classic tv today.
Fuck off.
I thought I was making a humorous comeback to the other post. Guess I’ll work on my comedy.
So, did you reply to the wrong person, or did you actually make that comment on your own post and then reply to me while forgetting to login to your throwaway???
Or on further looking are you confused, and you thought I was replying to you? Instead of the person that with the racist comment???
Ohhhh. I thought you were replying to me. I was replying to the racist post as well. Sorry for the confusion
There’s no conspiracy, it’s just virtue signaling to dumb people that still think there’s some Christian-right boogeyman controlling the world. The same middle-class, suburban mom demographic is being targeted as always and these days they’re in to gay shit it.
It's all cheap window dressing to earn woke dollars. You know this.
I don't know or care about your beliefs, witchdoctor, just don't flaunt your lifestyle before me and my gay ass self will live happily ever after.
Never would flaunt my lifestyle around you. I’m all for do what you want along as you don’t hurt anyone mentality but the whole representation obsession is everywhere. But like you said. It’s a game of who can get the most woke points