Full disclosure: as a Christian I believe the bible speaks against homosexuality (along with thousands of other sins) and that there are two genders. That being said, I am a firm believer that people should live how the please as long as they are not hurting anyone and if an adult wants to "change their gender" more power to them. I'll support your right to live how you want, and I hope they can respect my right to worship how I choose.
The other day I saw a commercial with a black "transwoman" talking about how when he was growing up he didn't see anyone that represented him. I almost started screaming at the TV. There is a very tiny amount of men who have gender dysphoria, and black men with gender dysphoria is an even smaller number. He was talking about how he wanted to make movies and I rolled my eyes because I am sure he will win an oscar someday by making some garbage movie that the critics will gush over.
Why do you think there seems to be an agenda to make it seem like LGBT people make up a large portion of the population? Of course anyone who asks this question gets told "gay people exist" or something about how heterosexuals shove their "heteronormative" lifestyle down everyone's throats. No point in responding to it because they will just screech louder if I say heterosexuality is the norm.
And of course with the representation comes the overhype like you see if there is a female, black, or hispanic person in a movie or TV Show. I can remember seeing articles about that one lady on Stranger Things who is a lesbian talking about how she was the best character in the whole series and to me that made no sense for a show paying homage to the 80s with a reformed jock and the nerdy girl, but gotta subvert expectations. Or the San Junipero episode of Black Mirror. The episode about ranking people via social media was a much better look at our society and raised some interesting questions but of course San Junipero was treated like the second coming of Citizen Kane.
So why do you think there is so much over-representation? I also saw a poll about LGBT being very high in younger groups but I have to believe at least some of that is due to being trendy and a lot of women who are married to men seem to love to say they are queer.
Like I said there are gay people who have the "don't bother me and I won't bother you" mentality. I'm mainly referring to the radical movement that considers it oppression if you don't enthusiastically celebrate and affirm their lifestyle.
Well written, you bring up an interesting idea though.
What is the goal of all these narratives is actually to reproduce the "only the genetically strong reproduce" system?
The effect of "trans" is to sterilize the person - they get their baby making parts amputated or redone in a way that prevents them from creating children that pass on their genetics. I've read some say the "trans" narrative is especially influential on autistic people. What if that's deliberate? If your autism makes you unable to recognize dangerous social narratives your genes get removed from the gene pool after you sterliize yourself.
I've heard others mention this idea as well, and thought of it myself. I just don't think it's true.
What's happening to us has happened to past people's as well, to varying degree. It's a predictable consequence of a combination of factors and forces. Strong communities and societies inhibit the growth of cancerous (self destructive) ideologies, philosophies, and practices, across all areas and in every scale, and inhibit the infestation of parasites who would use, manipulate, and pervert the system and the people for their own ends, at the expense of the people, usually by pushing these cancerous things.
It seems much more likely that the things being done to us are just to make us weaker and easier control. Mass manipulation of genetics is just an unintended consequence of some of their actions. As an example, if the evil string pullers' intention was mass eugenics, then they wouldn't implement mass dysgenics programs like welfare, which takes resources from the most intelligent/productive (meaning they have less kids), and give them to the least intelligent/productive (meaning they have more kids). Also, note that the string pullers aren't altruistic, which is what they'd have to be if they were mass manipulating our genetics for our benefit. Lastly, if they are doing it, but are so stupid that they're doing it this badly, it also precludes that they've thoroughly planned this all out (because they're stupid). There are too many contradictions to make it seem plausible that they're doing all this for eugenics purposes.
Don't ever forget the string pullers are evil, which is continually proven with everything they say and do. They're evil because they've abandoned truth to pursue their own power. Because of this, the fruits of the labor always inevitably spoil, which explains all the unintended consequences of their evil pursuits. The people at the top may be smart to have attained this much power, but they're not wise, because if they were they'd realize what they're doing is ultimately always self destructive, and that every individual, community, and society that is ruled by them, and follows their philosophies destroys itself.