Read detrans subreddit. It's very sad how many girls/young women are tricked into thinking that if you hated puberty it meant you were supposed to be born a man.
MtF on the other hand, seems to be vast majority perverts.
Don't underestimate the number of young men and boys that are groomed either. There is a large culture of gaslighting boys and young men with self esteem issues.
Not saying that most of the people who transition past 30 don't fit your description, but I think it's important to emphasize that the perverts (predators) and those they groom (their prey) are not the same. Even if a few of those that are groomed later go on to become predators after realizing that they've ruined their lives.
Like regular old gay men, most trannies that were once boys seem to have the common link of being sexually exploited one way or another as a child.
But most of them seem happy to continue the cycle and bring new ones into the fold. Even Milo tried to argue that older men fucking young boys is a good thing. So they deserve little empathy then.
It's because rather than admit the truth, that what happened to them was evil, they prefer to normalize it. The best way to normalize it is to do it yourself, and so the cycle continues.
So I went to r/detrans and o my god that is messed up.
I can never get over this. Not when knowing that my life is ruined and I didn't even have the chance to live. I am almost 30. Never held hands. Never kissed. Never had sex. I am stuck like this forever.
I take no joy in it, but I await the day we reckon as a society with the sterilized and medically butchered children put through this. I know there's naysayers because of the woke stranglehold, but it happened with conversion therapy camps and alter boys in the church.
It is said that the most zealous of all are the converts. What can be said of the converts who saw the error of their ways? Will the fire of vengeance take hold of their heart, and lay waste to their enemies? I can only hope, and I pray I live long enough to see it.
It's very sad how many girls/young women are tricked into thinking that if you hated puberty it meant you were supposed to be born a man.
Is it? I thought sad things are supposed to make people cry, not laugh. I love when they buy the male privilege lie. Fully deserved.
MtF on the other hand, seems to be vast majority perverts.
Ah yes, women's deflection theory. "It's nothing to do with us! Our control of culture, role models and society doesn't produce them, it's..." pause as they shuffle through the list of things they want banned "It's porn, 100%!"
The internet is exposing people to the biggest red-pill in the world and they are in panic mode. The degeneracy is going into overdrive, just like the censorship is, just like the absurdity memes are (eg. impossible to be racist towards white people, etc). They know time is short.
"The conservatards said that normalizing deviancy from the norm would lead to child grooming, what a stupid slippery slope argument!"
"Yeah... Slippery slope is a total fallacy... Never would happen, would it? Nothing ever compounds itself, nothing ever builds on previous victories, nothing ever leads in turn to other things. Crazy talk..."
I remember seeing an interview with some leader of some gay rights group on Global BC just after gay marriage was legalized. The reporter asked him, that, since all the rights the group was fighting for would be disbanded, he said "No, because people don't love us enough yet".
I can't describe in words the emotions I felt at that moment, but they ran towards anger and betrayal.
I thought the same thing about abortion when the left went from "safe, legal, and rare" to celebrating people having abortions. There's something deeply disturbing about watching the crowds cheering and crying when the various nations where it's illegal legalize it.
I think the bigger gain for them is complete control over the reproductive cycle. They own it legally, but with the ability to at any moment kill it as well there is no aspect of it that they don't completely dominate.
If society slides a little further downhill, you can bet your ass women will threaten to abort children as a manipulation tactic over their men to break their spirits.
If society slides a little further downhill, you can bet your ass women will threaten to abort children as a manipulation tactic over their men to break their spirits.
You have a higher opinion of them than I do if you think they don't already do this.
Nah, I'm certain they do but they aren't at the point yet where they can openly do it without fear of backlash.
We still have a little to go before it jumps from abusive women to general women, though feminism has taught us they will happily jump that line when the time comes.
Sheep/normies/NPCs have no idea what a logical fallacy is. They think it means something is wrong, and whatever the opposite of the person using the fallacy was arguing must be true. It's very similar to their total lack of understand as to what science is, despite them claiming the word as theirs and constantly exclaiming they believe in science to signal they think anyone who disagrees with them must be "unscientific".
A logical fallacy just means the logic of the argument is not sound. Meaning it's not absolute. There can be exceptions. The only place citing something as a logical fallacy is appropriate is an academic paper or a court of law. Colloquially, many lines of thought, slippery slopes included, are completely reasonable and useful to use. But just like these people have this warped view of the word science, they have a warped view of logical fallacies, and if they see a line of thinking that in a scientific paper or court of law constitutes a logical fallacy, they 'sperg out, pointing to it, believing whoever used it has been somehow proven wrong.
The reality is, most of the logical fallacies exist in the first place because they often hold true, but are not absolute, therefore not appropriate for places such as a court of law or a scientific paper where claims are expected to be absolute.
The Fallacy fallacy is an important one, that is all too readily forgotten. It can also be called the "Broken Clock" rule in a positive wording: Even a broken clock is right twice per day. And just because someone used a fallacy does not make their conclusion incorrect. In fact, someone can be completely off-their-rocker insane, and still have a correct conclusion:
As we know, the lizard-people who control the the illuminati who control the governments who control the MSM who control the people have four cones in their eyes, instead of three. This makes them extra sensitive to certain light wavelengths. So when they custom-built the Earth, they ensured that its sealant shell was of an agreeable color to them, and everyone from Darwin to Dawkins knows lizards' favorite color is blue. Thus, it can be resolved the sky is blue. Now, some crazies say the sky is blue because of reflected water light, but last I checked in my Brita filter, water was clear, not blue. So they're clearly wrong, but their conclusion is still correct about the sky's color.
Right, but it's not always just crazy coincidence if a person's correct, when they used a fallacy. Lines of thinking that are fallacies, such as slippery slope, are very valuable in debate, even if they aren't appropriate in writing the conclusion for a scientific paper or a judge writing their verdict.
Very true for the most part, but fallacies CAN be appropriate for a judge writing their verdict:
Ad hominem, in example, while a logical fallacy, can in its most classical form be used as a form of soft evidence: "George Floyd has a medical and criminal history of disposing of drugs in lethal doses by consuming them if pulled over. His lawyer's arguments are moot." is an ad hominem, it doesn't address the current court debate, it doesn't talk about the actions done that night. But it is a form of soft evidence that a judge or jury may take into account as to the character and likelihood of certain events happening as a defense lawyer may present them. Even more loosely, "George was a criminal who robbed women at gunpoint" is even more clear ad hominem, and poisoning the well, but would be taken as weak evidence. On the opposite side, "Chauvin has a history of hurting suspects during arrests, the defense's arguments are spurious in light of this" means nothing, as well, just an ad hominem, but will also likely be used as weak evidence against him as to his actions that night.
Animee's account is/was bpwpb (recently deleted). Challenor was a mod for r/lgbt, r/pan, r/whereintheworld, r/transtimelines, r/BritishAirways, r/RedditSessions, r/TheGamerLounge. Not sure about potential others
Nekosune is the a close contact/potential poly partner of Challenor. This is the last archive of the (active) account: https://archive.vn/jOfwN , which is now deleted (by the user) https://archive.vn/DVfJ7. Was also minecraft mod dev & participated in r/lbgt Minecraft, as did Challenor.
Personally I think it's incredibly funny that they admitted they adjusted the site-wide filters specifically to protect this person weeks before the news came out openly.
Finally, I kept asking on Reddit what this person was, a man dressing as a woman or a woman dressing as a man.
All I got was downvotes and deleted comments.
After seeing all the subs I would bet 10 bucks this fuck dresses up just to be a Reddit mod.
How the hell is something called lgbt_kidszone even allowed to operate?
Kill these people with fire.
How many confused kids end up on hormones by going to that subreddit? And I bet more then half those on that subreddit are adults.
Read detrans subreddit. It's very sad how many girls/young women are tricked into thinking that if you hated puberty it meant you were supposed to be born a man. MtF on the other hand, seems to be vast majority perverts.
Don't underestimate the number of young men and boys that are groomed either. There is a large culture of gaslighting boys and young men with self esteem issues.
Not saying that most of the people who transition past 30 don't fit your description, but I think it's important to emphasize that the perverts (predators) and those they groom (their prey) are not the same. Even if a few of those that are groomed later go on to become predators after realizing that they've ruined their lives.
Like regular old gay men, most trannies that were once boys seem to have the common link of being sexually exploited one way or another as a child.
But most of them seem happy to continue the cycle and bring new ones into the fold. Even Milo tried to argue that older men fucking young boys is a good thing. So they deserve little empathy then.
It's because rather than admit the truth, that what happened to them was evil, they prefer to normalize it. The best way to normalize it is to do it yourself, and so the cycle continues.
So I went to r/detrans and o my god that is messed up.
Can you imagine stuff like this?
I take no joy in it, but I await the day we reckon as a society with the sterilized and medically butchered children put through this. I know there's naysayers because of the woke stranglehold, but it happened with conversion therapy camps and alter boys in the church.
It is said that the most zealous of all are the converts. What can be said of the converts who saw the error of their ways? Will the fire of vengeance take hold of their heart, and lay waste to their enemies? I can only hope, and I pray I live long enough to see it.
i can, yes.
It is a depressing read - but I find some things to be a good reminder of why being against the culture war is important.
Is it? I thought sad things are supposed to make people cry, not laugh. I love when they buy the male privilege lie. Fully deserved.
Ah yes, women's deflection theory. "It's nothing to do with us! Our control of culture, role models and society doesn't produce them, it's..." pause as they shuffle through the list of things they want banned "It's porn, 100%!"
To quote another thread "I'm a transgender woman who is sixteen at the moment."
They don't reproduce, they recruit. Give me a child until he is 7 and I will show you the stunning and brave woman.
You know damn well how.
The internet is exposing people to the biggest red-pill in the world and they are in panic mode. The degeneracy is going into overdrive, just like the censorship is, just like the absurdity memes are (eg. impossible to be racist towards white people, etc). They know time is short.
In Jesus Awesome and Almighty name I agree and you state in your word O’ Lord that where two or more are gathered, “there I am also”, Amen
"The conservatards said that normalizing deviancy from the norm would lead to child grooming, what a stupid slippery slope argument!"
"Yeah... Slippery slope is a total fallacy... Never would happen, would it? Nothing ever compounds itself, nothing ever builds on previous victories, nothing ever leads in turn to other things. Crazy talk..."
I remember seeing an interview with some leader of some gay rights group on Global BC just after gay marriage was legalized. The reporter asked him, that, since all the rights the group was fighting for would be disbanded, he said "No, because people don't love us enough yet".
I can't describe in words the emotions I felt at that moment, but they ran towards anger and betrayal.
I thought the same thing about abortion when the left went from "safe, legal, and rare" to celebrating people having abortions. There's something deeply disturbing about watching the crowds cheering and crying when the various nations where it's illegal legalize it.
Abortion is an important stage in the feminist plan. It allows them to choose the gender of their offspring.
I think the bigger gain for them is complete control over the reproductive cycle. They own it legally, but with the ability to at any moment kill it as well there is no aspect of it that they don't completely dominate.
If society slides a little further downhill, you can bet your ass women will threaten to abort children as a manipulation tactic over their men to break their spirits.
You have a higher opinion of them than I do if you think they don't already do this.
Nah, I'm certain they do but they aren't at the point yet where they can openly do it without fear of backlash.
We still have a little to go before it jumps from abusive women to general women, though feminism has taught us they will happily jump that line when the time comes.
Careful, Antonio will start accusing you of being a conspiracy theorist.
Here I thought they just wanted to be left alone and allowed to love their legal consenting adults in a legal union.
Instead they gun for kids.
Sheep/normies/NPCs have no idea what a logical fallacy is. They think it means something is wrong, and whatever the opposite of the person using the fallacy was arguing must be true. It's very similar to their total lack of understand as to what science is, despite them claiming the word as theirs and constantly exclaiming they believe in science to signal they think anyone who disagrees with them must be "unscientific".
A logical fallacy just means the logic of the argument is not sound. Meaning it's not absolute. There can be exceptions. The only place citing something as a logical fallacy is appropriate is an academic paper or a court of law. Colloquially, many lines of thought, slippery slopes included, are completely reasonable and useful to use. But just like these people have this warped view of the word science, they have a warped view of logical fallacies, and if they see a line of thinking that in a scientific paper or court of law constitutes a logical fallacy, they 'sperg out, pointing to it, believing whoever used it has been somehow proven wrong.
The reality is, most of the logical fallacies exist in the first place because they often hold true, but are not absolute, therefore not appropriate for places such as a court of law or a scientific paper where claims are expected to be absolute.
The Fallacy fallacy is an important one, that is all too readily forgotten. It can also be called the "Broken Clock" rule in a positive wording: Even a broken clock is right twice per day. And just because someone used a fallacy does not make their conclusion incorrect. In fact, someone can be completely off-their-rocker insane, and still have a correct conclusion:
As we know, the lizard-people who control the the illuminati who control the governments who control the MSM who control the people have four cones in their eyes, instead of three. This makes them extra sensitive to certain light wavelengths. So when they custom-built the Earth, they ensured that its sealant shell was of an agreeable color to them, and everyone from Darwin to Dawkins knows lizards' favorite color is blue. Thus, it can be resolved the sky is blue. Now, some crazies say the sky is blue because of reflected water light, but last I checked in my Brita filter, water was clear, not blue. So they're clearly wrong, but their conclusion is still correct about the sky's color.
Right, but it's not always just crazy coincidence if a person's correct, when they used a fallacy. Lines of thinking that are fallacies, such as slippery slope, are very valuable in debate, even if they aren't appropriate in writing the conclusion for a scientific paper or a judge writing their verdict.
Very true for the most part, but fallacies CAN be appropriate for a judge writing their verdict:
Ad hominem, in example, while a logical fallacy, can in its most classical form be used as a form of soft evidence: "George Floyd has a medical and criminal history of disposing of drugs in lethal doses by consuming them if pulled over. His lawyer's arguments are moot." is an ad hominem, it doesn't address the current court debate, it doesn't talk about the actions done that night. But it is a form of soft evidence that a judge or jury may take into account as to the character and likelihood of certain events happening as a defense lawyer may present them. Even more loosely, "George was a criminal who robbed women at gunpoint" is even more clear ad hominem, and poisoning the well, but would be taken as weak evidence. On the opposite side, "Chauvin has a history of hurting suspects during arrests, the defense's arguments are spurious in light of this" means nothing, as well, just an ad hominem, but will also likely be used as weak evidence against him as to his actions that night.
Animee's account is/was bpwpb (recently deleted). Challenor was a mod for r/lgbt, r/pan, r/whereintheworld, r/transtimelines, r/BritishAirways, r/RedditSessions, r/TheGamerLounge. Not sure about potential others
Nekosune is the a close contact/potential poly partner of Challenor. This is the last archive of the (active) account: https://archive.vn/jOfwN , which is now deleted (by the user) https://archive.vn/DVfJ7. Was also minecraft mod dev & participated in r/lbgt Minecraft, as did Challenor.
Is this a good time to bring up spez's personal friend, maxwellhill?
Why are you referring to him as "she"? He will never be a real woman.
Good job screenshotting this.
Anyone else find it funny that they want to be seen as female, but their entire existence revolves around the term trans.
LGBT Kid Zone????
Fire up the helicopters.
How could they have an account for years with an AmongUs joke as a username?
Among Us came out in 2018 you know. And that account at least is only 5 months old.
Personally I think it's incredibly funny that they admitted they adjusted the site-wide filters specifically to protect this person weeks before the news came out openly.
he.
Yogscast
Why am I not surprised
Isn't Nekosune a different person to Aimie Challenor?
My mistake - I thought it was the same person - its apparently his boyfriend/husband
*He
"she"? why are you cucking to delusion?