Are they surprised? I don't see much surprise, only silence. They do not care.
Bill de Blasio shut down Times Square on New Year's Eve to broadcast a private dance with his wife wearing a pedo mask. These people have nothing but contempt for the plebs.
I would say it's a coincidence since not all of the symbols in the pattern are triangles, but considering she wore it while flexing on the rabble by dancing in Time's Square after shutting it down, I wouldn't put it past them.
The worst part about having a corrupt government is seeing how cheaply they were bought. Congress makes decisions that shift trillions of dollars, and they're willing to put their thumbs on the scale for what, a few million? Add up the net worth of every shady politician in Washington - would we be better off just bribing these people directly from the treasury on behalf of the nation?
There were some obvious mistakes made, such as Charles II, but I doubt aristocrats with experience managing livestock were unable to effectively manage their own genetic heritage through arranged marriages.
If someone is richer, more powerful, and more successful than you, they logically have something on you. Are they more physically fit? More attractive? Luckier? It might be luckier, but relying on luck alone you tend to lose in the end. Smarter? Maybe a combination of luckier and smart enough.
They're certainly not morons, though. Morons lose their power all too quickly. The simplest solution is not incompetence at every single level of elite power, that assumes far too many conveniences and coincidences as to how they are still "elite" after being morons for life.
Did you account for the fact that they are all in a big club together and they collude together to ensure that they are the only ones who sit at the top?
Like George Carlin said.
Nepotism is mainly why the current elites are in their position.
A moron threatens the inner circle's long-term power.
Morons don't stay in a club for long. Nepotism is part of luck, luck of your birth, but idiocy ruins even that level of luck. Loose ends are trimmed off. If you assume they're morons just because you can handwave away their position with "nepotism", you'll be sorely disappointed when the truth comes to light. They are at least as smart as yourself, likely more, and to assume ignorance when malice is possible is exactly what they'd want you to do.
The more "educated" people are the more ignorant they are.
People stopped developing mentally at that infantile stage where you read an article or hear a factoid and you suddenly think you know everything and are smarter than those around you.
We used to just pat these children on the head, say good job and ignore them. These days these children run the asylum.
Loads of crazy suicidal ones that actually look like art, but I key on the one that's probably like a 8 year old that made a bonfire to throw masks on. Yep, that's definitely a cool kid.
Another ugly one of note because of the quote that said "The teacher yelled at me for telling my opinion." Yeah, I know not shocking.
Quebec's leadership overtly said "our police-state impersonation does shit-all. But we think it's funny to have you guys suffer."
Okay, that's not an exact quote, it was more "We have no proof or even evidence that lockdowns, enhanced lockdowns, or the curfew we are implementing have any efficacy at all, but it nonetheless should work as a splash of cold water on the faces of those not taking us seriously." And that one isn't excessive hyperbole. They overtly said their methods are not for "working", they're for causing people to suffer.
They have probably been blocked from knowing about the millions of us that do care, but have been called grandma-killers and deplatformed for our daring to defy mass hysteria.
When "capitalism" destroyed the global economy in 2008, leftists were all about those knock-on effects. They crowed endlessly about massive increases in suicide, depression, homelessness, hunger, domestic violence, violent crime, everything. Because they believed they could lay all of that suffering at the feet of capitalism.
In 2020, governments all over the world destroyed the global economy, and to a far greater extent than 2008, with lockdowns that were not based in any science. The knock-on effects are incalculable. So why don't leftists care? Because this unilateral economic implosion is being used to destroy capitalism and implement socialism and communism. Who cares about suicide, starvation, homelessness, violence, etc. - we're in the middle of a revolution, here, comrade.
"SHUT UP KILL YOURSELF LIFE IS WORTHLES THERE IS NO MEANING TO ANYTHING THIS IS THE BEST YOU WILL EVER BE SHUT UP KILL YOURSELF LIFE IS WORTHLES THERE IS NO MEANING TO ANYTHING THIS IS THE BEST YOU WILL EVER BE SHUT UP KILL YOURSELF LIFE IS WORTHLES THERE IS NO MEANING TO ANYTHING THIS IS THE BEST YOU WILL EVER BE SHUT UP KILL YOURSELF LIFE IS WORTHLES THERE IS NO MEANING TO ANYTHING THIS IS THE BEST YOU WILL EVER BE"
Use of logic is forbidden. You know the whole if locking up millions of kids saves just one life of a bedridden 90 year old woman who is about to die anyway then it's worth it. Don't think you can look at kids suicides and count those either. Those are most definitely the right wings fault for not pushing the kids to remove or alter their genitals. They totally have nothing to do with any lockdowns.
The west is being exposed to psychological and emotional abuse on an industrial scale the likes of which haven't been seen outside of the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany. It's primary method of dissemination is through traditional and social media, along with the entertainment industry.
Of course kids aren't spreading it - they've been subject to the harshest restrictions. Under normal circumstances kids are really bad for spreading disease; taking the dumbest member of every household and putting them together in a building five times a week practically guarantees they'll spread it throughout the community. But that's not an argument for lockdowns, that's an argument for the government doing its job and controlling the border so this foreign plague never enters the community in the first place.
It seriously doesn't seem that hard to issue new guidelines - teachers who are vulnerable can teach online classes to those who choose to do them. Teachers who aren't can get their lazy asses back in work. All teachers and students should be assumed to have the China Flu and isolated from old people accordingly.
First qualification check. Are you a unhealthy fat man with a mental illness that makes you pretend to be a woman? If not, then it's already an improvement over some of our existing health officials. Health knowledge not necessary.
Honestly just swap the vulnerable teachers out for some that can actually do the job uncompromised. If they're are so feeble that they can't fulfill a critical component of society just because of a shitty Chinese knockoff flu, they should probably be on fucking disability or something, not dragging the kids down with them.
Online classes are a cheap copout. We should be demanding more from the people who leech our taxes for a living. If they're going to continue with that bullshit they should lose virtually everything and we should probably just homeschool or use private schools.
Edit: distinguished country of origin of the shitty knock off flu.
Well, I'm pretty sure it's illegal to do that, that's the problem. Besides, most of the vulnerable teachers are the most experienced, vulnerable because of their age. (right? Unless I'm missing something) You wouldn't want to fire people who are least likely to be useless hacks who got the job for the long holidays.
I just don't consider only being able to do video classes to be "the job", and if they're incapable of doing the job, having them paid the same and sitting in for the same role is absurd.
What they should do is keep letting the integrity of the school system crumble away with this overcompensatory bullshit (because it's pretty much just government funded day care and indoctrination camps) but slash funding proportionately and use those saved taxes to subsidize alternative schooling forms like private schools and grants for parents looking to home school.
I guess what I'm getting at is that I would be more ok with all the bullshit going on with public schools if I didn't know they were keeping all of their funding.
The average age of death of a COVID-haver is later in life than of a not-Covid-haver. They must prevent ANY chance immortality occurs, as it would cause untold economic chaos.
It's amazing how ingrained the indoctrination is in some people. I showed this to a few I know IRL and while they agreed it's awful what the lockdowns are doing to our kids, they doubled down and said that's exactly why we need to wear our masks and stay cooped up in our homes. ObViOuSlY, it's as bad as it is because people ignored the Science and our medical doctors. Add a few jabs at Trump supporters for good measure because 'those idiots are why we're still locked down a year later."
The best way too short circuit these people is to ask them what happened to the flu this year. Did we eliminate the flu with all of our covid-19 restrictions? Then why didn't they stop covid-19?
Yeah, agreed. Faceless Puppet Master (or is it TV-Screen-faced puppetmaster?) is a genuinely interesting presentation.
The photorealistic pencil art of Frodo and Sam is weirdly out of place. The three-eyed wolfman offering up a human heart and a knife had a youthful edgy creativeness to it.
Worst part about this: the perceived length of a year increases as your age decreases. If you live to be roughly 80 years old, you will perceive approximately half of your life to have taken place before the age of 18. This partially explains why our formative years are so formative.
Right now, young children are spending an enormous chunk of their perceived lifetime, and one of their most formative years, under oppressive and unnatural lockdowns. These kids aren't being properly socialized. They aren't seeing human faces. They're going to grow up fucking broken.
As I age, I find it is important to appreciate Time.
I try to spend a couple minutes a week just appreciating the passage of time, reflecting on past events. The reason humans perceive time so slanted is (IMO) we remember not the passage of time, but "events". Anything that blends into our monotony is, well, blended. Can you remember what you ate twenty-five days ago? Can you remember what you ate in the best day you ever had? One is monotony, the other is an event.
As a youth, all you have are Events. I jammed a nail through my hand last year by accident. I also, most likely, got any number of papercuts and bug bites. But I don't remember those, at least with any clarity. The nail I remember the entire scene, AND the aftermath and medical follow-up. It was an Event. But to a youth, being riddled in bug bits, or sliced up with aluminium foil cuts, they might be events. You'd remember them, the first time.
I remember every one of my sexual partners. But while I remember each one, I don't remember every single time with each one. I remember enjoying (or not) it, I remember some highlight best and worst parts, but not every action: it's all in the umbrella of the event that is their relationship. I could say I sexed "P" an estimated 45 times in that relationship, but it would be an estimate. A happy, satisfying monotony that blends together into the nostalgia of times lost.
My life began at 18, I was a reclusive shut-in. I had very few Events earlier than it compared to many. I had few friends, minimal excursions, life was "learn, eat, sleep, repeat". For me, the memory of 18-30 will likely be the "half my life" memory as I sunset.
What I'm trying to say in my rambling, is that the youth may be more resilient than you think. They may look back at these two years as one Event, but with many more to come later they will reflect upon more fondly. Assuming this madness actually ends, new events can broaden their horizons.
The most surprising thing is how many of the supposedly "smartest people in the room" are surprised by all this.
Our "elites" are morons.
These "elites" are utterly evil rather than just merely incompetent.
Are they surprised? I don't see much surprise, only silence. They do not care.
Bill de Blasio shut down Times Square on New Year's Eve to broadcast a private dance with his wife wearing a pedo mask. These people have nothing but contempt for the plebs.
Genuine curiosity, what's the deal with the pedo mask? What does that mean?
The mask De Blasio was wearing carried a symbol associated with pedophilia in its pattern.
Thank you
IIRC, it was the "boy lover" symbol. I have a picture somewhere of another politician having it as their organization logo.
Pedo symbols
de Blasios
I would say it's a coincidence since not all of the symbols in the pattern are triangles, but considering she wore it while flexing on the rabble by dancing in Time's Square after shutting it down, I wouldn't put it past them.
The aristocracy are always morons. Remember that for hundreds of years they were fucking inbred too.
No need to be smart when a bunch of malicious assholes are willing to legitimize your rule through violence for a few crumbs.
These people would literally be nothing without a throng of compliant servants, but that tribal mentality to follow a chief runs strong.
The worst part about having a corrupt government is seeing how cheaply they were bought. Congress makes decisions that shift trillions of dollars, and they're willing to put their thumbs on the scale for what, a few million? Add up the net worth of every shady politician in Washington - would we be better off just bribing these people directly from the treasury on behalf of the nation?
There were some obvious mistakes made, such as Charles II, but I doubt aristocrats with experience managing livestock were unable to effectively manage their own genetic heritage through arranged marriages.
The level of inbreeding in the aristocracy tells me otherwise.
If someone is richer, more powerful, and more successful than you, they logically have something on you. Are they more physically fit? More attractive? Luckier? It might be luckier, but relying on luck alone you tend to lose in the end. Smarter? Maybe a combination of luckier and smart enough.
They're certainly not morons, though. Morons lose their power all too quickly. The simplest solution is not incompetence at every single level of elite power, that assumes far too many conveniences and coincidences as to how they are still "elite" after being morons for life.
Did you account for the fact that they are all in a big club together and they collude together to ensure that they are the only ones who sit at the top?
Like George Carlin said.
Nepotism is mainly why the current elites are in their position.
A moron threatens the inner circle's long-term power.
Morons don't stay in a club for long. Nepotism is part of luck, luck of your birth, but idiocy ruins even that level of luck. Loose ends are trimmed off. If you assume they're morons just because you can handwave away their position with "nepotism", you'll be sorely disappointed when the truth comes to light. They are at least as smart as yourself, likely more, and to assume ignorance when malice is possible is exactly what they'd want you to do.
You are misunderstanding my point.
I think they got their position via nepotism but they are entirely malicious in trying to keep it.
I don't think they are bumbling lucky fools like you assume my point to be.
I think they are evil assholes who are arrogant enough to do anything to keep their power.
The more "educated" people are the more ignorant they are.
People stopped developing mentally at that infantile stage where you read an article or hear a factoid and you suddenly think you know everything and are smarter than those around you.
We used to just pat these children on the head, say good job and ignore them. These days these children run the asylum.
Loads of crazy suicidal ones that actually look like art, but I key on the one that's probably like a 8 year old that made a bonfire to throw masks on. Yep, that's definitely a cool kid.
Another ugly one of note because of the quote that said "The teacher yelled at me for telling my opinion." Yeah, I know not shocking.
Wait until they find out the pandemic itself was fraudulent, the lockdowns introduced specifically to create those feelings.
"Find out".
Quebec's leadership overtly said "our police-state impersonation does shit-all. But we think it's funny to have you guys suffer."
Okay, that's not an exact quote, it was more "We have no proof or even evidence that lockdowns, enhanced lockdowns, or the curfew we are implementing have any efficacy at all, but it nonetheless should work as a splash of cold water on the faces of those not taking us seriously." And that one isn't excessive hyperbole. They overtly said their methods are not for "working", they're for causing people to suffer.
Cui bono
Look at antifa, look at SJWs, look at cultural marxists. Mentally ill, the lot of them.
The plannedemic is absolutely beautiful in it's stacked objectives as a concentrated source of bringing about evil
Crush small business
Divide workers into essential and non-essential
Millions get on the dole
Isolate humanity from each other and create mental illness
Blame Trump and take him out
Dictatorships ruling by edict
Tens of thousands defenseless people killed in nursing homes
Supply chain problems leading to higher prices and shortages
Fuck around with election procedure and deny observers access
Habituate people to conform, snitch lines that would make Anne Frank blush
The ultimate cult of only government-approved science
If they wanted to push people to suicide, they don't need a lockdown. Just put women in charge of mental health. Works every single time.
Literally, check the figures.
The "no one cares" is the saddest quote on that first picture.
You know what the solution to this is?
More nihilism in cartoons.
You know how we can solve this? Changing genders.
They have probably been blocked from knowing about the millions of us that do care, but have been called grandma-killers and deplatformed for our daring to defy mass hysteria.
Crazy that the supposed 'evil right wing neonazis' are the only ones who seem to care about the children
When "capitalism" destroyed the global economy in 2008, leftists were all about those knock-on effects. They crowed endlessly about massive increases in suicide, depression, homelessness, hunger, domestic violence, violent crime, everything. Because they believed they could lay all of that suffering at the feet of capitalism.
In 2020, governments all over the world destroyed the global economy, and to a far greater extent than 2008, with lockdowns that were not based in any science. The knock-on effects are incalculable. So why don't leftists care? Because this unilateral economic implosion is being used to destroy capitalism and implement socialism and communism. Who cares about suicide, starvation, homelessness, violence, etc. - we're in the middle of a revolution, here, comrade.
moments later
You missed "We, the state, command you to be irrationally scared, so we can push you around more cost-effectively."
Can someone explain why exactly kids are being affected?
Everyone knows Covid spread is driven by the 18-25 age group. There's zero reason to lock kids up, even if you are trying to limit spread.
Use of logic is forbidden. You know the whole if locking up millions of kids saves just one life of a bedridden 90 year old woman who is about to die anyway then it's worth it. Don't think you can look at kids suicides and count those either. Those are most definitely the right wings fault for not pushing the kids to remove or alter their genitals. They totally have nothing to do with any lockdowns.
Psychological abuse. None of this is accidental.
You're right and it's worse than that.
The west is being exposed to psychological and emotional abuse on an industrial scale the likes of which haven't been seen outside of the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany. It's primary method of dissemination is through traditional and social media, along with the entertainment industry.
Of course kids aren't spreading it - they've been subject to the harshest restrictions. Under normal circumstances kids are really bad for spreading disease; taking the dumbest member of every household and putting them together in a building five times a week practically guarantees they'll spread it throughout the community. But that's not an argument for lockdowns, that's an argument for the government doing its job and controlling the border so this foreign plague never enters the community in the first place.
It seriously doesn't seem that hard to issue new guidelines - teachers who are vulnerable can teach online classes to those who choose to do them. Teachers who aren't can get their lazy asses back in work. All teachers and students should be assumed to have the China Flu and isolated from old people accordingly.
Easy. Impossible1 for CDC Chair 2021.
First qualification check. Are you a unhealthy fat man with a mental illness that makes you pretend to be a woman? If not, then it's already an improvement over some of our existing health officials. Health knowledge not necessary.
Your elector nomination is going to your head.
You dare talk to the God Emperor of Humanity like that?
Jokes aside, no, I'm kidding. I don't think I'll ever hold any positions of power, too much of a past and too controversial a person.
To be fair... from an accelerationist point of view it would be perfect.
Your patriarchal reing would be glorious, man. So much sandwiches would be made.
I'd give it about 10 days before a woman tried to assassinate me.
Honestly just swap the vulnerable teachers out for some that can actually do the job uncompromised. If they're are so feeble that they can't fulfill a critical component of society just because of a shitty Chinese knockoff flu, they should probably be on fucking disability or something, not dragging the kids down with them. Online classes are a cheap copout. We should be demanding more from the people who leech our taxes for a living. If they're going to continue with that bullshit they should lose virtually everything and we should probably just homeschool or use private schools.
Edit: distinguished country of origin of the shitty knock off flu.
Well, I'm pretty sure it's illegal to do that, that's the problem. Besides, most of the vulnerable teachers are the most experienced, vulnerable because of their age. (right? Unless I'm missing something) You wouldn't want to fire people who are least likely to be useless hacks who got the job for the long holidays.
I just don't consider only being able to do video classes to be "the job", and if they're incapable of doing the job, having them paid the same and sitting in for the same role is absurd.
What they should do is keep letting the integrity of the school system crumble away with this overcompensatory bullshit (because it's pretty much just government funded day care and indoctrination camps) but slash funding proportionately and use those saved taxes to subsidize alternative schooling forms like private schools and grants for parents looking to home school.
I guess what I'm getting at is that I would be more ok with all the bullshit going on with public schools if I didn't know they were keeping all of their funding.
A keen observation.
Well stated.
The average age of death of a COVID-haver is later in life than of a not-Covid-haver. They must prevent ANY chance immortality occurs, as it would cause untold economic chaos.
When one has no friends, the state shall become one.
It's amazing how ingrained the indoctrination is in some people. I showed this to a few I know IRL and while they agreed it's awful what the lockdowns are doing to our kids, they doubled down and said that's exactly why we need to wear our masks and stay cooped up in our homes. ObViOuSlY, it's as bad as it is because people ignored the Science and our medical doctors. Add a few jabs at Trump supporters for good measure because 'those idiots are why we're still locked down a year later."
There's no reaching some people.
The best way too short circuit these people is to ask them what happened to the flu this year. Did we eliminate the flu with all of our covid-19 restrictions? Then why didn't they stop covid-19?
Yeah, agreed. Faceless Puppet Master (or is it TV-Screen-faced puppetmaster?) is a genuinely interesting presentation.
The photorealistic pencil art of Frodo and Sam is weirdly out of place. The three-eyed wolfman offering up a human heart and a knife had a youthful edgy creativeness to it.
Worst part about this: the perceived length of a year increases as your age decreases. If you live to be roughly 80 years old, you will perceive approximately half of your life to have taken place before the age of 18. This partially explains why our formative years are so formative.
Right now, young children are spending an enormous chunk of their perceived lifetime, and one of their most formative years, under oppressive and unnatural lockdowns. These kids aren't being properly socialized. They aren't seeing human faces. They're going to grow up fucking broken.
I wonder if that's part of the plan.
Well, they'll make great pets when humans hit the galactic wet market in 2030, I guess. :P
As I age, I find it is important to appreciate Time.
I try to spend a couple minutes a week just appreciating the passage of time, reflecting on past events. The reason humans perceive time so slanted is (IMO) we remember not the passage of time, but "events". Anything that blends into our monotony is, well, blended. Can you remember what you ate twenty-five days ago? Can you remember what you ate in the best day you ever had? One is monotony, the other is an event.
As a youth, all you have are Events. I jammed a nail through my hand last year by accident. I also, most likely, got any number of papercuts and bug bites. But I don't remember those, at least with any clarity. The nail I remember the entire scene, AND the aftermath and medical follow-up. It was an Event. But to a youth, being riddled in bug bits, or sliced up with aluminium foil cuts, they might be events. You'd remember them, the first time.
I remember every one of my sexual partners. But while I remember each one, I don't remember every single time with each one. I remember enjoying (or not) it, I remember some highlight best and worst parts, but not every action: it's all in the umbrella of the event that is their relationship. I could say I sexed "P" an estimated 45 times in that relationship, but it would be an estimate. A happy, satisfying monotony that blends together into the nostalgia of times lost.
My life began at 18, I was a reclusive shut-in. I had very few Events earlier than it compared to many. I had few friends, minimal excursions, life was "learn, eat, sleep, repeat". For me, the memory of 18-30 will likely be the "half my life" memory as I sunset.
What I'm trying to say in my rambling, is that the youth may be more resilient than you think. They may look back at these two years as one Event, but with many more to come later they will reflect upon more fondly. Assuming this madness actually ends, new events can broaden their horizons.