Use of logic is forbidden. You know the whole if locking up millions of kids saves just one life of a bedridden 90 year old woman who is about to die anyway then it's worth it. Don't think you can look at kids suicides and count those either. Those are most definitely the right wings fault for not pushing the kids to remove or alter their genitals. They totally have nothing to do with any lockdowns.
The west is being exposed to psychological and emotional abuse on an industrial scale the likes of which haven't been seen outside of the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany. It's primary method of dissemination is through traditional and social media, along with the entertainment industry.
Of course kids aren't spreading it - they've been subject to the harshest restrictions. Under normal circumstances kids are really bad for spreading disease; taking the dumbest member of every household and putting them together in a building five times a week practically guarantees they'll spread it throughout the community. But that's not an argument for lockdowns, that's an argument for the government doing its job and controlling the border so this foreign plague never enters the community in the first place.
It seriously doesn't seem that hard to issue new guidelines - teachers who are vulnerable can teach online classes to those who choose to do them. Teachers who aren't can get their lazy asses back in work. All teachers and students should be assumed to have the China Flu and isolated from old people accordingly.
First qualification check. Are you a unhealthy fat man with a mental illness that makes you pretend to be a woman? If not, then it's already an improvement over some of our existing health officials. Health knowledge not necessary.
Honestly just swap the vulnerable teachers out for some that can actually do the job uncompromised. If they're are so feeble that they can't fulfill a critical component of society just because of a shitty Chinese knockoff flu, they should probably be on fucking disability or something, not dragging the kids down with them.
Online classes are a cheap copout. We should be demanding more from the people who leech our taxes for a living. If they're going to continue with that bullshit they should lose virtually everything and we should probably just homeschool or use private schools.
Edit: distinguished country of origin of the shitty knock off flu.
Well, I'm pretty sure it's illegal to do that, that's the problem. Besides, most of the vulnerable teachers are the most experienced, vulnerable because of their age. (right? Unless I'm missing something) You wouldn't want to fire people who are least likely to be useless hacks who got the job for the long holidays.
The average age of death of a COVID-haver is later in life than of a not-Covid-haver. They must prevent ANY chance immortality occurs, as it would cause untold economic chaos.
You can thank teacher's unions for this shit. Teachers are basically happy because either they get to now basically half ass their jobs or, they don't have to work at all because the school is completely closed. All the while collecting a full salary and benefits.
Now if schools were to reopen all those teachers would have to actually go back to work, thereby cancelling their year long sabbatical. They don't want to do that so they will help fearmonger to keep schools closed indefinitely (I remember the Chicago's Teacher's Union said that the push to reopen schools was rooted in "white supremacism"). Really it's a trend you notice in that the people who are most likely to be pro-lockdown are either people who are in comfy WFH jobs, Govt. Employees who are stoked that they get money for nothing now, and lazy ass NEETS who don't have to feel like their total lack of social interaction is a problem anymore.
I do want to say that it's mostly public school teachers unions pushing for this. Private school teachers (who are often higher skilled/more passionate) absolutely want schools to reopen. They want to reopen because they understand that these lockdowns are hurting the kids the most. Kids are going to fall behind both academically and socially. The poorer kids are going to be screwed over by zoom learning, and all kids, need to have social interaction.
The result of these lockdowns is going to be a generation of kids who will be less developed than prior generations, and believe me when I say that when those chickens come home to roost we are going to be FUCKED. Because these kids are going to one day take over, and it's unclear if they're going to be able to handle adulthood as well as prior generations.
Can someone explain why exactly kids are being affected?
Everyone knows Covid spread is driven by the 18-25 age group. There's zero reason to lock kids up, even if you are trying to limit spread.
Use of logic is forbidden. You know the whole if locking up millions of kids saves just one life of a bedridden 90 year old woman who is about to die anyway then it's worth it. Don't think you can look at kids suicides and count those either. Those are most definitely the right wings fault for not pushing the kids to remove or alter their genitals. They totally have nothing to do with any lockdowns.
Psychological abuse. None of this is accidental.
You're right and it's worse than that.
The west is being exposed to psychological and emotional abuse on an industrial scale the likes of which haven't been seen outside of the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany. It's primary method of dissemination is through traditional and social media, along with the entertainment industry.
Of course kids aren't spreading it - they've been subject to the harshest restrictions. Under normal circumstances kids are really bad for spreading disease; taking the dumbest member of every household and putting them together in a building five times a week practically guarantees they'll spread it throughout the community. But that's not an argument for lockdowns, that's an argument for the government doing its job and controlling the border so this foreign plague never enters the community in the first place.
It seriously doesn't seem that hard to issue new guidelines - teachers who are vulnerable can teach online classes to those who choose to do them. Teachers who aren't can get their lazy asses back in work. All teachers and students should be assumed to have the China Flu and isolated from old people accordingly.
Easy. Impossible1 for CDC Chair 2021.
First qualification check. Are you a unhealthy fat man with a mental illness that makes you pretend to be a woman? If not, then it's already an improvement over some of our existing health officials. Health knowledge not necessary.
Your elector nomination is going to your head.
You dare talk to the God Emperor of Humanity like that?
Jokes aside, no, I'm kidding. I don't think I'll ever hold any positions of power, too much of a past and too controversial a person.
Honestly just swap the vulnerable teachers out for some that can actually do the job uncompromised. If they're are so feeble that they can't fulfill a critical component of society just because of a shitty Chinese knockoff flu, they should probably be on fucking disability or something, not dragging the kids down with them. Online classes are a cheap copout. We should be demanding more from the people who leech our taxes for a living. If they're going to continue with that bullshit they should lose virtually everything and we should probably just homeschool or use private schools.
Edit: distinguished country of origin of the shitty knock off flu.
Well, I'm pretty sure it's illegal to do that, that's the problem. Besides, most of the vulnerable teachers are the most experienced, vulnerable because of their age. (right? Unless I'm missing something) You wouldn't want to fire people who are least likely to be useless hacks who got the job for the long holidays.
A keen observation.
Well stated.
The average age of death of a COVID-haver is later in life than of a not-Covid-haver. They must prevent ANY chance immortality occurs, as it would cause untold economic chaos.
You can thank teacher's unions for this shit. Teachers are basically happy because either they get to now basically half ass their jobs or, they don't have to work at all because the school is completely closed. All the while collecting a full salary and benefits.
Now if schools were to reopen all those teachers would have to actually go back to work, thereby cancelling their year long sabbatical. They don't want to do that so they will help fearmonger to keep schools closed indefinitely (I remember the Chicago's Teacher's Union said that the push to reopen schools was rooted in "white supremacism"). Really it's a trend you notice in that the people who are most likely to be pro-lockdown are either people who are in comfy WFH jobs, Govt. Employees who are stoked that they get money for nothing now, and lazy ass NEETS who don't have to feel like their total lack of social interaction is a problem anymore.
I do want to say that it's mostly public school teachers unions pushing for this. Private school teachers (who are often higher skilled/more passionate) absolutely want schools to reopen. They want to reopen because they understand that these lockdowns are hurting the kids the most. Kids are going to fall behind both academically and socially. The poorer kids are going to be screwed over by zoom learning, and all kids, need to have social interaction.
The result of these lockdowns is going to be a generation of kids who will be less developed than prior generations, and believe me when I say that when those chickens come home to roost we are going to be FUCKED. Because these kids are going to one day take over, and it's unclear if they're going to be able to handle adulthood as well as prior generations.