Friendly reminder *gag* that Biden also wants to get rid of section 230. Not because Internet corps censor too much but because they censor too little.
They don't need to get rid of it, they need to enforce it. Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, and I'm sure more are clearly acting as publishers and not platforms. That means they need to be open to liability for any illegal content on their sites.
So of course Biden's handlers want it gone. They're clearly censoring in the DNC's favor.
Ask polish people how they made it through both german and russian occupations.
I'll tell you how: by not giving up, being stubborn and keeping their culture underground when needed.
“If there was hope, it must lie in the proles, because only there, in those swarming disregarded masses, eighty-five percent of the population of Oceania, could the force to destroy the Party ever be generated. The Party could not be overthrown from within. Its enemies, if it had any enemies, had no way of coming together or even of identifying one another. Even if the legendary Brotherhood existed, as just possibly it might, it was inconceivable that its members could ever assemble in larger numbers than twos and threes. Rebellion meant a look in the eyes, an inflection of the voice; at the most, an occasional whispered word. But the proles, if only they could somehow become conscious of their own strength, would have no need to conspire. They need only to rise up and shake themselves like a horse shaking off flies. If they chose they could blow the Party to pieces tomorrow morning. Surely sooner or later it must occur to them to do it.”
illegal behaviour towards a person that causes mental or emotional suffering, which includes repeated unwanted contacts without a reasonable purpose, insults, threats, touching, or offensive language
If it's "illegal" why are you advocating for enforcement to be delegated to private companies?
Behaviour that rises to the level of criminal harassment should be prosecuted through the courts, where all parties can present evidence and have their case heard, not implemented as some person who will never be held accountable deciding that this list of names no longer gets to use the internet.
North Korea will officially have a freer internet than the west in certain areas if this passes.
Friendly reminder *gag* that Biden also wants to get rid of section 230. Not because Internet corps censor too much but because they censor too little.
They don't need to get rid of it, they need to enforce it. Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, and I'm sure more are clearly acting as publishers and not platforms. That means they need to be open to liability for any illegal content on their sites.
So of course Biden's handlers want it gone. They're clearly censoring in the DNC's favor.
Admins please take note.
We might need another bunker.
Defeatism is a poor way to honor our forefathers who fought and beat the greatest empire on the face of the earth at the time.
You lost your faith maybe.
Ask polish people how they made it through both german and russian occupations. I'll tell you how: by not giving up, being stubborn and keeping their culture underground when needed.
The only thing women are superior over men at is breast feeding.
don't despair, ready yourself
Good luck with that.
Thanks for the doomerism.
If they actually go after everyone that voted Trump then that is a resounding 70 million people, it just won't end well for them.
Don't archive Reclaim the Net. They are on our side, they need revenue.
Highly disagree. Give direct links to friendly sites, but still archive them.
You never know what will happen in the future.
OK, but link directly in the post. Then in the comment section leave an archive. Otherwise, this websites will go bankrupt.
Hm, but their site might get shut down.
archive everything.
nearly every time "harassment" is investigated it's either from the person claiming to be a victim, or a friend.
This is harassment, stop
We must put him on AOC's list, comrade.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H47ow4_Cmk0
I was looking at your post history earlier. You are a weird dude. Most of your comments are posting similar variants of the same nonsense.
Its just a low effort troll. Just generic NPC lines.
K
So you want to hunt down yourself? Truly fitting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H47ow4_Cmk0
Ah, but who determines what constitutes "harassment"?
illegal behaviour towards a person that causes mental or emotional suffering, which includes repeated unwanted contacts without a reasonable purpose, insults, threats, touching, or offensive language
If it's "illegal" why are you advocating for enforcement to be delegated to private companies?
Behaviour that rises to the level of criminal harassment should be prosecuted through the courts, where all parties can present evidence and have their case heard, not implemented as some person who will never be held accountable deciding that this list of names no longer gets to use the internet.
But that definition you are guilty of those crimes here.
I only acted in self defence, I never started the arguments
Comment Reported for:
Comment Removed