illegal behaviour towards a person that causes mental or emotional suffering, which includes repeated unwanted contacts without a reasonable purpose, insults, threats, touching, or offensive language
If it's "illegal" why are you advocating for enforcement to be delegated to private companies?
Behaviour that rises to the level of criminal harassment should be prosecuted through the courts, where all parties can present evidence and have their case heard, not implemented as some person who will never be held accountable deciding that this list of names no longer gets to use the internet.
Ah, but who determines what constitutes "harassment"?
illegal behaviour towards a person that causes mental or emotional suffering, which includes repeated unwanted contacts without a reasonable purpose, insults, threats, touching, or offensive language
If it's "illegal" why are you advocating for enforcement to be delegated to private companies?
Behaviour that rises to the level of criminal harassment should be prosecuted through the courts, where all parties can present evidence and have their case heard, not implemented as some person who will never be held accountable deciding that this list of names no longer gets to use the internet.
But that definition you are guilty of those crimes here.
I only acted in self defence, I never started the arguments