11
Vicious_snek6 11 points ago +11 / -0

We could make a movie about it even

3
Vicious_snek6 3 points ago +3 / -0

The DVA hasn't reach Canadian levels of bad yet then? That's something

Yeah the vets here in Aus are treated abysmally too. There are a bunch of different pensions and stuff for free/discounted therapy in our semi socialist system. Let's say the vet wants physio and speech path, for a war wound affecting the face. NDIS (properly disabled people under 65) and medicare and aged-medicare/myagedcare are the big 3, and some private health insurance cases too. That there is 90% of their caseload, with another 8% being nominally private, getting some documentation to get onto the NDIS or something. DVA you rarely see, its that final 2% you don't often taketake. But when you do, the clinic either rejects it for it being so bad of a deal for them, pennies, compared to the main pensions and requiring yet more paperwork for something you rarely work with, politely suggest they go and look into getting onto one of the others before you'll see em, or take it on essentially out of charity/patriotism.

6
Vicious_snek6 6 points ago +6 / -0

The canadian trucker's freedom convoy, and their lawyer(!) too. That's another big one hitting the news atm.

And with the visa thing, it looks like a big 2nd wave of it to me, not a slowing down.

4
Vicious_snek6 4 points ago +4 / -0

My worse suspicion is that it is because the parents don't know how to do it, and neither did their parents. This is why some of these kids have been going and watching videos from the 1950's on how to talk to women, or how to date. That was literally the last time the information was passed down. The boomers passed nothing, so no generation after them passed anything either.

This is my big issue with schools. People send them there to learn to socialise? Bloody retarded, they learn to socialise from degenerate teens who learnt from other teens, who passed it down from other teens and what is being taught now has essentially no value outside of school... . Back in the day you'd graduate from the children's group as you entered your teen years and join a group of adults, learning to hunt, or the trades and skills from them and attempting to impress and socialise with them. That's what we're meant to be doing. Young men are supposed to learn from a group of men and earn their place and respect. Not learning to (and being rewarded for) acting like fools doing what impresses other children.

E: and it's just getting worse and worse with the lack of male teachers and discipline in the schools. It's wasn't good back in the day when those things existed, but it wasn't as degenerate as it is now.

2
Vicious_snek6 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, that and too much browsing old twitter and 4chan. It would be the topic of conversation for some threads, but also people just liked to post it to troll/shock ya know?

2
Vicious_snek6 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, that and too much browsing old twitter and 4chan. It would be the topic of conversation for some threads, but also people just liked to post it to troll/shock ya know?

19
Vicious_snek6 19 points ago +19 / -0

Yeah.

Same thing as the beheading vids and necklacing vids and all that shit, we all remember seeing that stuff right?

You don't need to see all of it and it will only causes harm to expose yourself to it. You could maybe say it's your responsibility as a man, knowing what is out there and what you need to protect your family from, to understand and see one, and if you believe we actually have democracy, knowing who you're voting to go to war with, or ally with. Otherwise only if you're actually the one making that kind of decision. We could have an argument for that. But repeated exposures after that one are unnecessary.

12
Vicious_snek6 12 points ago +12 / -0

Spiritual warfare. Spiritual attacks. THE enemy, the prince of lies.

Are you retarded, because that should be obvious from the context, even if you're not a believer

3
Vicious_snek6 3 points ago +3 / -0

yeah, just because I am in favour of monarchy doesn't mean I'm in favour of this monarchy.

2
Vicious_snek6 2 points ago +2 / -0

Basically they are australia's BBC/PBS/NPR. Public broadcasters, with the ABC being fully gov funded, and the SBS a bit more like PBS/NPR, mostly gov funded. 60% IIRC

Each with 4 tv channels or so. And 50 odd radio channels (a bit hyperbolic, but it's definitely up there). The ABC was a bit more respected, like the BBC. SBS was always lefty cringe and foreign news shit, with occasionally edgy stuff in the evening. It's where we would get south park actually

Remember the internet song and privilege bridge rap? That was the ABC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eN5ZmrN8fBs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1ZD1_m7-0E

If you've not seen them? We'll you're in for a treat, assuming you like cringe.

11
Vicious_snek6 11 points ago +11 / -0

2,612 characters

"simple thing I wrote"

The Bible is a fair bit longer than even 2,612 characters. You're really not helping your case for you being capable of a sola scriptura approach if you can't manage so much as 410 or so words in a refutation.

Did you want a 280 character limit here, like twitter or something?

And yes, simple. I ran it through a Flesch-Kincaid tool for you:

Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 7.1

Flesch Reading Ease Score: 72.4

Reading Level: 7th grade ( Fairly easy to read )

If you need simpler, please tell me what grade level you need and I'll try to accommodate word it all simple like.

15
Vicious_snek6 15 points ago +15 / -0

Well, now we know you of all people really shouldn't rely on just your own reading, because you've taken a completely inverted meaning from this simple thing I wrote.

My point is that a sola scriptura reading of it doesn't tell you how to organise this list of 10 commandments, there are more than 10 imperatives. I was open to it here though, I said go ahead and try. On this matter, it's all a load of tradition that isn't held as dogma. My point is that to insist on your list, you're not relying on a plain reading, you're relying on a different American(?) tradition that you can't even fully remember.

They even removed one of the Ten Commandments.

"Thou shalt not bow before any graven image" or however it goes.

And accusing Catholics of holding a tradition that they do not hold, and one we aren't dogmatic about.

Then they split the tenth into two--"thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's house" and "thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's possessions"--to bring the total back to ten.

I don't know where you think you read any of this, but being so wrong about scripture and faith traditions like that doesn't exactly inspire a lot of confidence in a sola scriptura approach.

13
Vicious_snek6 13 points ago +13 / -0

They even removed one of the Ten Commandments.

What? We removed nothing. No commandments, and no books of The Bible ;-)

There are 13 or so imperative (command) statements in exodus 20 and Deuteronomy 5. The Catholics (and some mainline prots from my understanding) draw more from Deuteronomy. The numbering of the verses of The Bible is new remember, the verses weren't distinct the way they are now, so with 13 apparent command statements, you'll need to find some way decide which belong together to make 10. If you want to rely on sola scriptura instead of the church fathers and tradition for this, then go ahead (because it's not a matter of dogma I don't think), go decide for yourself how those should be organised, without reference to any other list or tradition, which should be grouped together. Particularly without the verse numbering. Read it and see for yourself.

They even removed one of the Ten Commandments.

"Thou shalt not bow before any graven image" or however it goes.

No, in the catholic understanding it is all a part of the first commandment, from Deuteronomy5:6-10. It's not removed, it's merged in and counted as a part of that. Same as how you 'removed' lusting and coveting someone's wife. You merged it into your 10th, under all covetousness, for property too.

Then they split the tenth into two--"thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's house" and "thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's possessions"--to bring the total back to ten.

No, it's wife and possessions. If we're numbering and ordering these to create a list of 10, wife and possessions seem a bit different to me, different sins, and following from the 6th and 7th commandments to not steal and not commit adultery, the 9th and 10th are to not even be envious or have lust for those things. They're seperate in the 6th and 7th, makes sense to be seperate in the 9th and 10th too to me. If it were house vs possessions, you might have a point and it would look like two very closely related things had been separated into two commandments. But no, the wife and possessions are quite distinct in my view. I think the Lutherans do it that way, with them separating out house and possessions. Seems weird, I agree. But if you take issue with them doing that, that's not us, go take it up with Luthor (who at least also put the idolatry in as part of the first commandment btw)

But also, it's not dogma, nothing is 'set in stone' on this as it were (heh). The other methods of listing them can be valid. It's more just the shorthand way we teach and memorise it.

Oh and it's 'murder', not 'kill'. Why did you change that?

12
Vicious_snek6 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yeah there's a weird heretical trend in and from America that thinks Catholics are idolatrous at best. Some will claim we are isis and devil worshipers.

The old Chick tracts were full of it.

It's not that much of a stretch to then want war with rome. Or to be largely indifferent to what you see as satanic temples getting hit in a righteous holy war when you love the country of isreal so much because of your dispensationalist beliefs.

Is every prot like that? No. But there's a weird evangelical american strain that certainly is.

8
Vicious_snek6 8 points ago +8 / -0

not surprised, knowing that family, all right pieces of work.

13
Vicious_snek6 13 points ago +13 / -0

EVEN the far left realise how damaging it would be as Trump I'm 99.9% confident isn't on the list as he was busy with supermodels.

The evil ones had access to it for too long. I said this ages ago.

I think that those who are on it don't all belong on it

Those who belong on it aren't all on it.

26
Vicious_snek6 26 points ago +26 / -0

She'd happily lock us up for posting here, trample lockdown protestors, and arrest some autistic girl for an innocent comment.

She protects the ones who punched her

Zero sympathy.

7
Vicious_snek6 7 points ago +7 / -0

what about naming the gayest corps being against stop killing games stuff is lefty?

4
Vicious_snek6 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah it's a very American thing. Evangelical and Baptist. Ew.

11
Vicious_snek6 11 points ago +11 / -0

I think bollywood films have the same

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›