Considering that literally any criticism of them can be qualified as "antisemitism", I agree.
Man it's worse than that, you criticize banks and media and you immediately get called an antisemite too
Also ask yourself this, if guns are no threat to them why are they trying so hard to take them from you?
But it really doesn't do much to deter a tyrannical government that doesn't care about the lives of their brownshirts.
The brownshirts don't want to get shot, and if they have to wonder whether they will be, they won't go as far for a tyrannical government. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn talks about this in The Gulag Archipelago, how things might have been different if the enforcers had been afraid they wouldn't come home.
And any government is going to think twice about doing something that might cause a shootout, if only for the optics.
You can't take down an army by yourself and guns can't do much against tanks etc but the point is not to make it easy for them. When it's easy for them they get a lot worse.
Deterrence is important.
I don't agree with imp's need to tie everything to women but he's party right, there's cause and effect, and feminization of society (emotional voting and thinking/moral hysteria) is what leads to this shit.
But yeah, the pedos in question are the ones who chose to do this and they deserve to burn
They always lie. Their entire method is lying/twisting context to justify their hysteria, to in turn justify their extreme responses and grabs for power.
Never believe a progressive without doing your own research. Never take a progressive at face value, even if they're talking about their own personal experience. I'm sure you know this already but it should be said often
They fundamentally think people are stupid and easily tricked.
tbf, they haven't seen much evidence to the contrary
Because poor minorities LOVE to have their sleep interrupted between shifts or, god forbid, when they're trying to improve their situation in some way.
Oh I forgot, those people aren't really racial minorities, they're 'oreos' or 'uncle toms' or whatever. Sorry, author, you're right, respecting others is white supremacy.
On another note, do you think this is why a lot of inner city kids hate the wilderness? They're so used to the constant noise they feel frightened and lost without it? Like your average consumer when they can't access their Netflix account.
The whole point of progressive politics is just that; progress. You look at society, you identify problems, and you propose improvements.
If only. Most of them skipped over the 'identify problems' step and decided to fabricate problems instead.
In fact, they seem aggressively opposed to understanding.
They are. Reality is normative and oppressive, and must be deconstructed. Their dogma is all that matters. It disagrees with reality, so rejecting reality is a virtue that must be aggressively pursued. Embracing reality at the expense of dogma is an unforgivable sin.
Realistically, it would be much harder to get loans if there was no gain for the lender.
Low interest loans entered into by mutual consent are reasonable. Lending to someone incurs a risk and the opportunity cost of not having that money while it's being borrowed.
It's wonderful when people band together to do selfless things, but quid pro quo isn't inherently immoral. Mutual interest makes the world go round, same as it ever has.
'usurer' sounds a lot like 'usurper'
Tolerance and acceptance aren't enough. It has to be celebrated. Everywhere. Or else.
You are not allowed to have a faith that does not embrace the LGBTQIA+ (unless it's Islam). Everything stable and independent of progressive propaganda must be infiltrated, subverted, and made to take the knee.
Or else.
Of course straight people can and will get it. It doesn't magically affect only gay people.
But it's 99% gay dudes who are affected and anyone who wants to play word games over it just wants to obfuscate that reality.
I'm with you on the obsessive need to defend homosexuality . 'Live and let live' is as far as it should have gone. Giving progressives any leeway is a huge mistake.
A lot of those examples are wrong or twisting context (leftists are great at that), but forgetting that for a moment... the difference is that the stories were idealist then, but they were stories first and foremost with a moral lesson attached. Now they're subversive trash which exist only to preach and dismantle society.
It's still hypocrisy as long as they pretend we're equal under the law.
If the globalist elites want to be kings and follow different rules, they can tell us to our faces instead of having this endless, tiresome parade of propaganda and manufactured consent.
Until then, they're filthy hypocrites.
There is simply no place for political violence in a healthy democracy.
Does anyone believe this is a healthy democracy anymore? It's diseased and rotting.
The embracing of harems is all kinds of fucked up. Having it's origins in racist bullshit from from Colonial European travellers
Ah yes, the white people who witnessed the harems are at fault here, not the cultures that actually had them.
The mental gymnastics that must be employed to indirectly criticize middle eastern traditions are truly impressive.
True enough.
No no, it's worse than that. Women have agency sometimes, such as when it works to win them an argument or qualifies them for a right or a privilege. They just suddenly don't have it when it means taking responsibility.
Not to overuse a tired joke but "Schrodinger's competence" perfectly describes feminism's crowning achievement. It might have been the first modern example of doublethink, and it paved the way for the rejection of reality that dominates clown world.
Cool, can men sue women for unintended pregnancies too? With jail time if they deliberately sabotage contraceptives and baby-trap him?
Okay, Trump might be poison, but can I at least enjoy the idea of the total meltdown that'll take place if he gets in again?
I know they'd just double down and Clown World would get worse, but at least it would be cathartic in the short term
We all had to mask and vax mandate even though it did nothing, but the government will never tell faggots to stop their buttfuck rampage
They haven't addressed this yet, but the moment it grains traction we'll see a creepy NPC update in real time. There'll be a single line about why it's okay to keep butt fucking even though we all had to sacrifice freedoms for covid, it's different because of something about stigma and disparate impact on the queer community, and you will see EVERYONE repeating it verbatim. And I'm not talking about the twitter bots, I'm talking about real people who can't be distinguished from them.
Personally I think we'll get some NPCs with defective programming who criticize the "selfish anti science plague spreaders" in the gay community and they will be SHUT THE FUCK DOWN. Looking forward to it.
shockingly
Why is this a problem? You can force their inclusion but you can't force people to want it.
If it's such an issue why don't women buy the game and support the inclusion of the women's team? Oh they're not interested? Imagine that.
Sometimes there just isn't a big market for something. That's okay.
By the way it's fucking creepy that EA are monitoring who plays what, not to see what's popular and worth putting resources into, but for woke purposes.
I always thought pedophiles should be able to admit what they are and get help without having their lives destroyed
And as for the genuinely tragic cases of good people who have desires they can't control, I'm sorry, they should not be alone with children. Their comfort is not more important than society's right to protect its children.
I always thought pedophiles (edit: who haven't done anything yet) should be able to admit what they are and get help without having their lives destroyed, but fuck this "accept it as a sexuality" bullshit. The answer is: No.
I would "accept" it as far as a mental illness that needs to be rectified, but that's no good either in clown world, because we all know how it treats destructive mental illnesses and we all know the slippery slope is real.
"Overcome our negative feelings about pedophiles?" Again, I repeat: no.
If enough people make them resort to bloodshed instead of going quietly, oppressing the people becomes increasingly expensive and logistically difficult. Their tyranny thrives on acquiescence.
Guns (probably) aren't going to stop them if they're intent on destroying you but if they have an agenda other than bloodshed for its own sake, making the path of tyranny as costly as possible can make all the difference. Enough people banding together could deter them entirely, or at least force them to regroup.
The true effectiveness of civilian deterrence against a modern government might not be known but logistics, expenses and optics make a difference in any conflict.
I can't say how committed the "fuck around and find out" types are but I know it's always better to have guns and the will to use them than to have neither