Based on what evidence?
Some queer furry trans lover shooting Kirk is the easiest thing in the world to believe, so you'd need to have some really powerful evidence to put that into 'hard to believe' category.
Text messages: he thought he would get away with it, then when he sees himself on the camera he tries to keep his gay lover off the hook.
Fighting in court: other crazy libs are paying for it, the gov't won't let him off with a low-time plea deal because politics, so he rolls the dice at trial.
Erika: she's acting out good-Christian in forgiving him, and her and Turning Point seem to have a lot of secrets they want the spotlight off of.
I've barely even scratched the surface of inconsistencies on this thing
So you lead with the obvious, easily explained ones?
Basically the government hasn't shown you their entire case and all the evidence, you say "why haven't they shown us the entire case? huh? conspiracy they're hiding things!"
News for you, that's what the trial is for. That's when you get to see the entire case made, not before the trial.
Trump's said for the last several decades they can't be allowed to have a nuclear weapon, their leader even said (more or less) they weren't going to stop doing that, and they apparently didn't stop.
They crossed our red line, so yeah they did mess with us.
Again all this policy was clearly stated by Trump.
Trump has always been very clear that nobody will want to mess with us because they know he will attack them. Peace through strength, not isolationism. Nobody could be confused about this unless they only saw out of context clips and intentionally discounted his persona.
A warmonger is somebody like John Bolton, who's not in the government. You could argue Hegseth is a warmonger, but he seems like the type to actually win the war whereas warmonger is more perpetual-war war-industry type.
They don't need to pay for NATO.
You EU are so entitled. You don't pay for NATO, that's anti-American.
'Sure we're doing anti-American things, but that doesn't mean we are anti-American. Oh also defend us from the world because we're weak and pathetic'
lol
You're saying all the people, everyone there, is upset that their leadership is pro-American and wants them to stop. That's called being anti-American. Duh.
You think it's only your leadership that's pro-American, but they're not paying for NATO, they're resisting Greenland, fining our big tech as a tax, and so on.
Your leadership is not even pro-American, they are against what Trump wants of them. I don't know how EU could be more retarded.
"Started no new wars," past tense, not won't ever start a war.
"we don't need the wars [in] counties you've never heard of"
You've never heard of Iran? lol
You don't even listen to the words he says in the clip that you linked. This is exactly what I'm talking about, you even now continue to hear what you want to hear and then get mad about it.
Everybody could tell the election was stolen, they just didn't know or have the time to figure out how. Now Jan 6 has turned into another impeachment hoax - just more retarded shit liberals fall for every time.
No, turning point was Butler PA obviously.
After being shot he wanted to actually do things, getting revenge on "them" that shot him being a big part. The very night of he called RFKj, said what he wanted to do in 2nd term, and RFKj was like 'holy shit I'm in'.
The main issue isn't that 'he's changed' it's that you guys simply didn't listen to what he said, or it was wishful thinking. For example he was never against wars, he was against 'stupid' wars that take 20 years and don't accomplish anything. He was never against farm workers.
Guys, he never promised to cross the Rubicon. You need a different man for that, and I'd run him on an anti-Israel platform because he'll be called that anyway, and it's really popular and needed.
Trump admin wanted the strait shut down to Europe from the start. That was probably the main reason even for doing this war.
You can see it in the leaked Signal chats when they were bombing the Houthis; they said they were opening up shipping for EU and complained they weren't even grateful.
EU continued to be anti-America so now America is holding their 'petrol' and fertilizer hostage until they get in line.
either rebooted or disconnected during recent attacks on Iran – despite the regime disconnecting the nation from the global internet.
Are they not aware that any Starlink or any other terminal smuggled into the country can give access to their internet from outside? They actually thought just unplugging the undersea cable would protect them?
can be activated by a signal from a satellite
"Why is there a satellite receiver on our Cisco switch?" is not something they thought of until now? It's not something you can hide in a BIOS or even in a chip, it'd be huge and obvious to anybody that looked.
I heard Persians were supposed to be smart.
It might seem that way, but with a system like this a primary concern is keeping all the page rendering data in memory so it's fast.
So what's used to render a page won't be stored in a massive all-vote database where they do a query counting all the down/up votes each time, but something that processes incoming up/down votes and applies them to a per-post cache or a highly compressed structure that fits in memory.
For example last I heard the entirety of Hacker News is in RAM on one server. Scored probably not designed by phd computer scientists so I bet it takes 100x more resources than HN.
When the voting was backlogged back in the day they probably did something like put vote handling on a separate server or added processing steps to make it fit in RAM. Maybe downvotes are on a separate server that crashed, or they had a bot-detection step on downvotes that crashed the whole pipeline, or it could be lots of things like that.
...or they could have just turned them off because of Iran war being unpopular. I'm just saying having a system failure is a plausible explanation for all downvotes disappearing.
Actually it completely explains why all the downvotes disappeared.
Database is corrupted or otherwise won't open, system can't display any downvotes on any comment.
Neatly explains everything even the lack of communication; like they're going to come out and say "uh thing broken we tarded".
Not necessarily nefarious though.
Back in the day votes would get queued up and it'd take minutes or hours for your vote to register on refreshed page so the system is probably a huge mess of jeetcode.
Could just be their downvote database filled up once there was an issue where half the users were mass downvoting the other half, and they don't know how to fix it.
edit: actual study "Finally, we assessed the heatmaps generated by participants’ clicks on the rung they felt best represented the extent of their moral circle."
So I guessed wrong, the heatmap shows that most liberals say they care about universe-level things, but not how much they care. Other charts in the paper show liberals do care more about more-distant people than conservatives, but it's less pronounced than this.
Basic idea of the chart is right, this graph is just an exaggerated representation of it.
Shortly before ivermectin became horse medicine a study showed it could trigger apoptosis in some cancer cells. Another showed it could 'reset' immunity some cancers develop to chemo. A few other positive studies.
But none showed it cured cancer by itself.
So adding it to traditional treatment seems like a good idea, but I certainly wouldn't rely on it to save me.
Let no opportunity go to waste is all.
At most they knew this guy was planning and let him show up, but then it's whether secret service knew he was a 'tard or hoped he'd succeed.