For Trump alone, there have been 3 different incidents:
- Butler, Pennsylvania - 1 audience member killed, 2 others injured
- West Palm Beach, Florida - Traffic stop resulted in injuries to a 6-year old girl
- White House Correspondents Dinner
Charlie Kirk's killer was also not identified based on pre-trial facts regarding the weapon and force. There are also some who question the sincerity of his widow.
So, with that said, why did they stage the press dinner? Which, if any, of the other events were also false flags?
Some queer furry trans lover shooting Kirk is the easiest thing in the world to believe, so you'd need to have some really powerful evidence to put that into 'hard to believe' category.
Text messages: he thought he would get away with it, then when he sees himself on the camera he tries to keep his gay lover off the hook.
Fighting in court: other crazy libs are paying for it, the gov't won't let him off with a low-time plea deal because politics, so he rolls the dice at trial.
Erika: she's acting out good-Christian in forgiving him, and her and Turning Point seem to have a lot of secrets they want the spotlight off of.
So you lead with the obvious, easily explained ones?
Basically the government hasn't shown you their entire case and all the evidence, you say "why haven't they shown us the entire case? huh? conspiracy they're hiding things!"
News for you, that's what the trial is for. That's when you get to see the entire case made, not before the trial.