Maybe it hit a bird and nobody saw the feathers because it was on the missing video file that "the Man" is hiding from you. Jesus Christ man.
What's your better theory, well you don't have one. You don't even have a more credible theory than the bullet hitting something in air.
lol you can't even exclude it hitting a bumblebee, much less body armor, or a bone, or any number of other things. You're sure it wasn't body armor because 'somebody said so'.
And even though your earlier claim of "large size of the "entry" wound" was key evidence, which may be consistent with the bullet starting to deform before hitting him.
Anyway thanks for this view into your crazy. A handgun at close range that nobody saw and there's no evidence of and a conspiracy to frame a guy who was on the roof with a gun. Absolutely nuts.
Look how crazy your reasoning is:
hit a bee and start deforming before his neck
Hitting a bee is negligible loss of kinetic energy.
Not what I said and what this tells me is you don't know what effect that would have, but to exclude all possibilities like you claim then you have know this.
Dodging a bullet is impossible too, Trump did it.
Extremely possible for a 21-year old kid to miss a shot, actually.
Missing a shot is not dodging a bullet.
Rule of thumb, when you feel you can't address the point and have to sidestep it's because you know you're wrong.
Didn't hit body armor first.
Multiple confirmations he wasn't wearing body armor.
Others say it looks like there was and the high tech body armor has NDA because they don't want their reputation ruined. Maybe, maybe not, but if you're to exclude all possibilities you have to know for a fact.
Why don't they release the part of the video
Why would you need to see the video if you already know what the answer is? Because you're presupposing your theory (that it was something else, but you don't know what) is true and then using a lack of evidence as evidence for it. That's just nuts man.
To say it wasn't this gun and bullet you can show what it actually was - you haven't - or you can prove there's no possible way it could be, and you haven't done that either.
Oh yeah, so a human neck can contain 2,500 ft-lbs of energy without deformation?
You're saying there's no possible way a bullet from that gun could ever lodge in his neck, no matter how unlikely. Didn't hit a bee and start deforming before his neck. Didn't hit body armor first. No possible way. Absolutely impossible even with multiple worlds theory of quantum physics. You're excluding every possible explanation even ones you haven't even thought of.
Come on. Dodging a bullet is impossible too, Trump did it.
In contrast I'm saying it happened. We saw him get shot. What improbable events happened to not have an exit wound, if that is even true, we may never know.
I've seen a video of the guy climbing down off the room after and he's clearly holding a long flat object the size of the rifle. Maybe that was a loaf of Italian bread he was bringing home for his furry? Have you by any chance been asking AI to confirm your theories lol.
Don't know how you can say it's "physically impossible" since it seems to have happened. Improbable, sure, certainly not impossible.
Let me put it this way, what is it that you want the explanation to be? Israeli ninja smuggled a phone-gun in and shot him at close range without anybody noticing anything and also convinced a troony to be up on the roof at the time with a working gun but not fire and then hacked into his phone to send some weird text messages? What explanation would be satisfying.
Maybe the guy damaged the bullet when he was engraving the casing? Hit a bee on the way? Reporting inaccurate? Who knows. Weird things happen.
I'm not sure what the actual problem here is. He definitely was shot and killed despite what Gemini was saying a while back.
edit: the bee theory was supposed to be representative of "stranger things have happened", but I guess that's expecting too much here. Regardless, counterintuitively the higher the power the less the bullet penetrates water. Bugs are mostly water. A hollow-point would probably start disintegrating the instant it hit a big one. Million to one odds, but maybee so.
If blacks were 12% population and 85 IQ (source) when the data was collected then the rest would be 99.1 - accounting for natives and such almost exactly the same as highest of Western countries like Canada/Australia/Germany/UK.
It's kind of remarkable how stable IQ is, even though I'd expect a nation of settlers to select for intelligence (have to be all-around capable) and also IQ tests at Ellis Island.
pictures of Mrs Macron pregnant and raising her children, Clare said they existed and would be presented in court where there are rules and standards.
Oh I have zero doubt the pictures exist. Question is whether they existed before ChatGPT made them.
If the rules and standards say nobody gets to examine the pictures for AI, there's no provenance, then Candace is proven right and Brigitte is a dude.
If there's a $1 million fee to get a foreigner working here, businesses will only bring in workers that provide more value than that. It's not bribery at all, it's a merit test.
Why should you get paid for doing nothing and not being qualified or skilled to do the work? If you can do the job they can't (on paper) bring the foreigner in. Unless you don't even apply for the job.
lol what? Somebody else, an American, was going to do that job if we didn't get him. It's not like we weren't going to have a rocket program. Just not as well.
The point of H1B is to import people when we don't have Americans that can do the job. They can't be taking somebody's job if there's nobody here that can do it.
The program isn't run that way, instead we're getting Indians replacing Americans, but that's the purpose of it. Putting a high fee on it means businesses won't be saving money replacing Americans and only use the program for people who are adding to the country not replacing - great idea.
As if we should have sent Wernher von Braun to the Russians cause he was a filthy German.
Somewhere in the $100k - $1 million fee range we'll augmenting rather than replacing.
We should be poaching the best and brightest and rejecting the street shitters. I don't get why it's so hard for people, left or right, to understand that some particular immigrants are good for us while others are bad.
They don't even know it's happening.
Like Graham Linehan, famous guy, lots of their listeners love IT Crowd - NPR didn't even mention he had been arrested or why.
The most they've maybe heard is some snopes-like "conservative are saying the UK is arresting people just for saying bacon comes from pigs. fact check: false, nobody has been arrested for saying bacon comes from pigs" to prime them to dismiss it without doing any research on their own.
All of their terrible policies and arguments boil down to "sad thing happened, now do what we want".
If we don't accept their victimhood and whining then they have nothing. We don't have to have a fight about trans bathrooms or 'hold our ground', that's all nonsense that only exists from exploiting our compassion. They paint a sad story about trans being bullied in the men's locker room and say so we have to let them perv on women, but when we just say "trans are bullied? don't care, don't be trans" their ideology collapses.
This is what Kirk did, he said it was their choice to be victims and offered them redemption instead of suffering, and didn't accept their pity plays. Same thing Myron Gaines does, only far less politely - no excuses, personal responsibility, accountability - you can be strong and healthy and successful if you choose to be.
That's the successful message. No whining, no flop falls, no pity plays allowed. Then the policy issues fix themselves.
Basically he's been fired for cause, so ABC doesn't have to pay out his contract.
But he'll contest it and maybe win in court/arbitration because he'll say it was an innocent mistake, so the lawyers get together and decide how much he gets and what discount ABC gets from his golden parachute.
Or they can keep him on, take the PR hit, lose some (small) portion of his audience that aren't insane sickos, and risk him saying something else dumb. Win-win for everybody except leftists.
Question I have is whether they were always evil and kept it suppressed because they knew it was unacceptable to voice or if today they've been made extraordinarily evil.
Sadly I think they were always evil. For instance, I know well a leftist who 30 years ago found himself next to a 'bad' politician. In private, said he was just standing there thinking how much he really wanted to assault the guy. Didn't, but only because of the repercussions. If it was guaranteed he'd get away scot free he'd have done it.
I've never felt that way about anyone I disagree with. I don't feel I can even empathize to understand what is going on in their mind. But I don't feel like it's a new thing.
I'm not sure what the 'controversial dagger' math is. I think it's by close total up/down votes or something like that, not a percent, but in any case it's rarely shown on comments that are definitely both significantly upvoted and downvoted. Mostly only seen on low total score comments. Also turned off by default.
In any case 51% is for illustrative purposes; real divisive issues are probably more like 2/3 and 1/3 because people participate more in forums where they agree with the hivemind.
Actually reddit are responsible. Their karma/voting scheme is designed to create an overall hivemind in their users.
A 51% opinion gets positive score and looks very popular, a 49% opinion gets a negative score and looks like a garbage take. By hiding the total votes they make it impossible to tell if +100 is a popular opinion or a 51%.
They use this hivemind creator and tip the scale to make it a liberal hivemind, like when they manually altered the code to bias against The_Donald because it was >50% popular with users and creating a pro-Trump hivemind.
If they want to not be held responsible they can at least show vote totals, if not something pro-discourse like downvotes being valued less so you get 51% opinions with 49% right under instead of buried.
He validates my theory that when there's a group credited with something, like this Sokal Squared thing, there's always one person who is carrying the others.
Peter Boghossian is the actual talent behind that, still a thoughtful smart reasonable person trying to turn insanity into sense, whereas Lindsay is the clown that got carried. I can only imagine how much dumb shit Peter had to put up with working with this 'tard because I'm sure he's too polite to tell.
Well that's your opinion, that out of millions of college students radicalized by leftism that zero of them could this crazy, but I've seen at least a dozen lunatics coming up to the mic at his college appearances that I could easily see pulling the trigger if they had the opportunity. I think you're underestimating just how insane these college environments are.
It's totally possible Israel orchestrated this, but like I've said before even if they didn't they'll want to in private take credit for it because they can whisper 'don't criticize us or you'll end up like Kirk'. That doesn't mean they did it, it just means they're ghouls that would try to profit off it.
So one thing I'm sure of is that TV news interviewing Netanyanhu to say "totally wasn't Israel guys, that's absurd" is them trying to capitalize on it.
No theory of your own, still incapable of understanding a deformed bullet doesn't penetrate as far with the same energy.
Why do they make bullets pointy? A mystery you may never unravel.