Fuentes is well informed and accurate.
He just hasn't had much of a filter to know what things are supposedly taboo. That's what people like about him.
I don't think he's moderating his views at all, just applying more of a filter to try to avoid being murdered by leftists.
Probably essential jobs get reviewed. Like there's a list of all the essential jobs and why they're essential, and they don't want "Domestic Propagandist" getting FOIA'd.
The other thing is that if they're not essential they're legally prohibited from working. They can't log in from home and post for free, that's actually a crime.
I think OP is trying to say now Cruz is on the good side again after being 'MAGA is hitler' for a while.
Cruz is a classic politician so he's just playing the system, which he feels means being a Jew pawn, while acting like he's not. It's hard to know what he actually stands for.
Cruz and Rubio were both beltway politicians, but Rubio went all-in on MAGA when he didn't have to. He could have stayed establishment and put up roadblocks like he was expected to. Cruz as a Senator hasn't really had the opportunity to go all-in since it's not executive and the only power he really has is behind the scenes deal-making. Hopefully if he ever does get exec power he'll be another Rubio, but I doubt it.
Not just normal qualities you can touch.
For instance materials that emit heat radiation in bands the air is transparent to. Completely inert material that just gets cold as if by magic.
They've made it already, just not cheaply.
Your version is a summary of the controversy, grokipedia's is a summary of the facts.
"Critics, skeptics, controversial, should not, likely." These words don't belong in an encyclopedia.
All they did with Grokipedia probably is say "here's a wikipedia article, rewrite it using only relevant facts."
People get red pilled, start looking into real conspiracies like Russia Russia Russia or 2020 or Covid and so many others and forget there are actually fake theories.
It's especially bad for high-profile people like Candice because no doubt all kinds of groups are purposely trying to make them go off the rails.
Presumably it's an adaptation to lack of fresh water in the Arab region.
It takes lots of water to make toilet paper (wood pulp + water) or before that to wash a cloth. Much less water to wash a hand because skin is designed to shed off filth. Even less water to just keep one hand clean.
The really disgusting part is they're still doing it.
The always answer is, are the women doing it because of some need like to support their parents or a real passion? Then they can do a good job, whatever it is. East Asian women for example (outdated rule of thumb now).
Any other case, they're terrible. Invest thousands of hours getting good at something, or onlyfans.
Same reason why the only even remotely good female comedians are ugly. Lisa Lampanelli for a prime example.
Not a Hammer expert but literally the only thing he tells them is "no".
"But I need my $8 Starbucks twice a day" "No, you can't afford it"
"But I need to spend $5000 on concert tickets" "No are you INSANE?!"
"No" is literally fascist to them.
Diversity of opinion is their language.
It sounds kind of good if like SM1 you're charitable in interpreting it to mean diversity of viewpoint or different perspectives or backgrounds. For instance, a botanist working with a cryptographer will have much better chance at the Voynich manuscript than two cryptographers.
But they mean it in the sense that "my truth" and "the truth" are better than just the truth. "My truth" as a synonym for opinion is never a positive contribution.
I think what's underlying the destruction of the West is mostly a deep scar and echo from WWII.
It's not a coincidence that the enemies of the West call those trying to save the West Nazis. They're sticking their finger in the wound to hurt us, because it does hurt us.
The deep culture lesson the masses took from WWII is that any of us can go along with and do the most terrible things we thought only 'lesser' races did and so we have to be hyper-vigilant against becoming that monster. This directly led to 'civil rights' that destroyed black society (which relies on stricter discipline to function), anti-men Feminism, mass immigration, all the focus on 'victims' and 'minorities'. Anything to not become the bad Nazi.
And it's not just the holocaust, but all the other terrible shit. Fire tornado in Dresden, the atom bombs, a lot of truly horrible death on an industrial scale. All the whites believed they could have been the bad guys.
Today, to the older say half of any Western country WWII was a real thing - even if it was before they were born they knew somebody that was shell-shocked or that should have been there but died. But the hope is that to the younger half it's just book thing. "Oh so I'm a Nazi because an illegal alien got deported? Don't care." It's like calling somebody a Red Coat - you know it's an insult but it's not the four-letter N-word. The crazy young left is still echoing the cause, maybe louder than ever, but the foundation is gone.
Amadeus (1984): "...that doesn't really work, does it? Did you try... shouldn't it be a bit more... Or this... This. Yes. Better? What do you think?"
Amadeus (current year): "Oh yuck who wrote this?"
My sentiments exactly.
I never said they should release all the evidence. In this specific case I'm asking for one uncut video of which they've released some footage that is entirely useless.
Why not all the evidence? Because obviously they're not going to do that. Duh.
You only demand they release the one bit of evidence your conspiracy theory hinges on being missing that you know they won't release because they don't release evidence they save it for court so they don't poison the juror pool with people who are already familiar with it.
The only reason you have given that the FBI should release more of the footage is to make you happy. Ok, well, they don't give a shit about you they're the FBI.
Transparency and accountability.
That's why you want it released. Why would they release it?
They wouldn't, there's no reason to expect the FBI to publicly release all the evidence they've collected. There's no reason they would play an hour of video in a press conference.
So your answer is "you want them to". That's crazy. FBI is not going to release the whole video to make you feel good.
It was a press conference. lol you guys are such clowns. You can't answer why you expect the full video in a PR stunt or why you think any org would publicly release all the information they've collected because it's literally crazy to think they would.
I listed out all the parties that could release "the footage" meaning all the parts you want to see. College wouldn't have released any of it, prosecutors wouldn't have released any of it, FBI would only release enough for PR to make themselves look competent (they shouldn't have shown any of it, but that's the FBI).
Why would you expect to have seen more of the footage? You think FBI is going to have a 10 hour press conference and go through all the evidence they've collected, or even just an extra 15 minutes of watching silent video? It's a crazy premise.
Growing up I never understood why Frankenstein was a thing.
Monster brought to life, finds out it can't have kids then it kills people and itself. What an amazing story /golfclap
I had suspected as much, but turns out the only reason anybody cared about this story, even back in the day, is it was written by a woman. Mary Shelly's mother was a feminist, she was a feminist, her one successful story co-authored by her actual talented husband, other works full of self-inserts and described as "hack" writing and "pedestrian". It's the prototypical woke story.
The only good things about it are the name and the "it's alive!" lightning scene. Except the name and idea are aped from her visit to Castle Frankenstein where an actual real-life mad scientist had claimed to discover an 'elixir of life', and the lightning scene was created by Hollywood.