Here is the actual video he is referring to. It's an hour long and so haven't had time to go through it fully but one of the key things I noted was around 21:00 she rejects gender representation in the Diet.
All in all, it's a better statement that the new pm points against ISLAMIC immigration to Japan than anything.
Even then it'll either be a disagreement on aesthetics, or one position will be shown to be objectively correct. It's why lolbertardianism and neo-koshervatism are now relics of the past.
It sounds kind of good if like SM1 you're charitable in interpreting it to mean diversity of viewpoint or different perspectives or backgrounds. For instance, a botanist working with a cryptographer will have much better chance at the Voynich manuscript than two cryptographers.
But they mean it in the sense that "my truth" and "the truth" are better than just the truth. "My truth" as a synonym for opinion is never a positive contribution.
I think there's a bit of confusion, when I say 'diversity of opinion', I mean amongst those that CAN debate.
A monarchist, a conservative, A democracy advocate, A libertarian etc can all debate and even come to a consensus on issues.
Feminists DON'T debate, communists don't, leftists don't. They only seek subjugation so as such, can ONLY be treated as a hostile entity with no concessions.
It's more or less an academic debate in the first case anyways. What is of most benefit to the people is the optimal system, everything else is window dressing. Any nation-state requires homogeneity of culture and values. And primarily race.
The video is a really hard to watch because of her broken English.
But one of the things she says is something along the lines of “the diversity folks are the real racists because they apply stereotypes and we should look at all people as individuals”
Big fucking red flag.
Also keep in mind she is a “hafu” foreign blood. Her entire identity - and I do mean entire life - has been defined by her ethnic difference from standard Japanese. She would have been made distinctly aware of that since birth.
Yeah. And he doesn't do that because he's a 'weak beta male'. He does it because democracy is a fundamentally corrupt system. So it doesn't matter who you 'vote' for.
You do actually. Men are not shielded from criticism like women are. You can “threaten” a man. You can’t do that with a woman. And the “based index” is all skewed. If a man has to be a minimum 7/10, to be accepted, a woman can get away with at a 5/10
Funny how you posted a screenshot and not a link to the video. I wonder why that would be. Here's an AI summary of what that video is.
Politician Kimi Onoda argues true diversity is respecting individuals, not categorization by attributes, criticizing how "diversity" efforts often impose stereotypes on women and minorities, citing her own experiences.
Yeah, I'm no fan, but its summarization skills aren't bad.
Call me jaded and/or fatigued but I don't care to sit through over an hour of foid babble.
So you posted this without the slightest check on what the content was, and ended up posting it with the suggestion that it was the opposite of what she actually said?
Yeah OP should have actually checked what he's talking about. But AI summaries are pretty inaccurate. Summaries of scientific papers tend to generalize the conclusions and leave out important details (and newer AIs are worse). Summaries from questions about "the news" are allegedly inaccurate 29% of the time and 53% have significant issues (but this study has a big conflict of interest). I don't have data on video summaries, but from what I've read they can make stuff up and don't understand things like sarcasm.
Here is the actual video he is referring to. It's an hour long and so haven't had time to go through it fully but one of the key things I noted was around 21:00 she rejects gender representation in the Diet.
All in all, it's a better statement that the new pm points against ISLAMIC immigration to Japan than anything.
When has "diversity," "change" or "stop hate speech" ever worked out well in the past? Genuine question.
Diversity of opinion is the ONLY one that truly matters as the only reason we are having to go hardline is the opposing side rejects ALL debate.
Because we can, they can't.
Even then it'll either be a disagreement on aesthetics, or one position will be shown to be objectively correct. It's why lolbertardianism and neo-koshervatism are now relics of the past.
Diversity of opinion is their language.
It sounds kind of good if like SM1 you're charitable in interpreting it to mean diversity of viewpoint or different perspectives or backgrounds. For instance, a botanist working with a cryptographer will have much better chance at the Voynich manuscript than two cryptographers.
But they mean it in the sense that "my truth" and "the truth" are better than just the truth. "My truth" as a synonym for opinion is never a positive contribution.
I don't believe in diversity of political opinions for the workplace. If you're a feminist, you should be shut out.
Go ahead and disagree with me, but it's the bare minimum we need to claw our way back.
I think there's a bit of confusion, when I say 'diversity of opinion', I mean amongst those that CAN debate.
A monarchist, a conservative, A democracy advocate, A libertarian etc can all debate and even come to a consensus on issues.
Feminists DON'T debate, communists don't, leftists don't. They only seek subjugation so as such, can ONLY be treated as a hostile entity with no concessions.
It's more or less an academic debate in the first case anyways. What is of most benefit to the people is the optimal system, everything else is window dressing. Any nation-state requires homogeneity of culture and values. And primarily race.
Yeah fair enough. I look down on center left opinions too though
Well that's natural, too many still go 'We can fix them' with the malicious retards currently advocating for the third world replacement of the West
The video is a really hard to watch because of her broken English.
But one of the things she says is something along the lines of “the diversity folks are the real racists because they apply stereotypes and we should look at all people as individuals”
Big fucking red flag.
Also keep in mind she is a “hafu” foreign blood. Her entire identity - and I do mean entire life - has been defined by her ethnic difference from standard Japanese. She would have been made distinctly aware of that since birth.
It's not like you get something different by voting for a man.
A weak beta male maybe. Or maybe "voting" should be done away with altogether and we should go back to absolute monarchy.
Do you consider Trump a 'weak beta male'? Look at what he does. Who he surrounds himself with.
At this point yeah I kinda do.
Cuck to Israel
jews
Yeah. And he doesn't do that because he's a 'weak beta male'. He does it because democracy is a fundamentally corrupt system. So it doesn't matter who you 'vote' for.
He is Bibi's bitch. I consider him less than a beta male.
You do actually. Men are not shielded from criticism like women are. You can “threaten” a man. You can’t do that with a woman. And the “based index” is all skewed. If a man has to be a minimum 7/10, to be accepted, a woman can get away with at a 5/10
Dumb
... what?
Funny how you posted a screenshot and not a link to the video. I wonder why that would be. Here's an AI summary of what that video is.
Sorry for bursting your bubble.
Oh, the AI said so.
Call me jaded and/or fatigued but I don't care to sit through over an hour of foid babble.
Yeah, I'm no fan, but its summarization skills aren't bad.
So you posted this without the slightest check on what the content was, and ended up posting it with the suggestion that it was the opposite of what she actually said?
I jumped to a conclusion based on a mixed female talking about "diversity" and "change." The only change Japan needs is to go back to pre-1945 law.
I notice you're not addressing her stance on "hate speech" either.
Turns out, she was criticizing those things. So it's all good now, or you still hate her?
Very perceptive. I didn't address something you didn't bring up about a person I don't know.
Sounds like a lukewarm "criticism" at best, will watch before I draw a conclusion. And that's literally the first half of the meme.
At last.
I admitted I hadn't watched it earlier. Why are you arguing the feminist position on this? While also defending communism in another thread?
Yeah OP should have actually checked what he's talking about. But AI summaries are pretty inaccurate. Summaries of scientific papers tend to generalize the conclusions and leave out important details (and newer AIs are worse). Summaries from questions about "the news" are allegedly inaccurate 29% of the time and 53% have significant issues (but this study has a big conflict of interest). I don't have data on video summaries, but from what I've read they can make stuff up and don't understand things like sarcasm.
https://futurism.com/ai-chatbots-summarizing-research
https://www.dw.com/en/chatbot-ai-artificial-intelligence-chatgpt-google-gemini-news-misinformation-fact-check-copilot-v2/a-74392921
Yup. Anyone who uses AI summaries instantly has their opinions and retorts wholeheartedly dismissed with prejudice.
It's fascinating to me how Japanese people will sometimes look part-Caucasian.
Kim Onoda is a half jap. Apparently her father was an American passport bro who left when she was 2.
Oh, sweet, I guess my halfie radar was working.
Wikipedia is suspiciously sparse on the dad's info, making me think he'd fail the E.L. check.
No one asked for change.
Leave us alone.
Or it's going to get nasty.
We won't do shit and you know it.
Right-pic she's kind of cute. Could be the software face tune-up though.