I think there's a bit of confusion, when I say 'diversity of opinion', I mean amongst those that CAN debate.
A monarchist, a conservative, A democracy advocate, A libertarian etc can all debate and even come to a consensus on issues.
Feminists DON'T debate, communists don't, leftists don't. They only seek subjugation so as such, can ONLY be treated as a hostile entity with no concessions.
It's more or less an academic debate in the first case anyways. What is of most benefit to the people is the optimal system, everything else is window dressing. Any nation-state requires homogeneity of culture and values. And primarily race.
I don't believe in diversity of political opinions for the workplace. If you're a feminist, you should be shut out.
Go ahead and disagree with me, but it's the bare minimum we need to claw our way back.
I think there's a bit of confusion, when I say 'diversity of opinion', I mean amongst those that CAN debate.
A monarchist, a conservative, A democracy advocate, A libertarian etc can all debate and even come to a consensus on issues.
Feminists DON'T debate, communists don't, leftists don't. They only seek subjugation so as such, can ONLY be treated as a hostile entity with no concessions.
It's more or less an academic debate in the first case anyways. What is of most benefit to the people is the optimal system, everything else is window dressing. Any nation-state requires homogeneity of culture and values. And primarily race.
Yeah fair enough. I look down on center left opinions too though
Well that's natural, too many still go 'We can fix them' with the malicious retards currently advocating for the third world replacement of the West