Yeah OP should have actually checked what he's talking about. But AI summaries are pretty inaccurate. Summaries of scientific papers tend to generalize the conclusions and leave out important details (and newer AIs are worse). Summaries from questions about "the news" are allegedly inaccurate 29% of the time and 53% have significant issues (but this study has a big conflict of interest). I don't have data on video summaries, but from what I've read they can make stuff up and don't understand things like sarcasm.
Yeah OP should have actually checked what he's talking about. But AI summaries are pretty inaccurate. Summaries of scientific papers tend to generalize the conclusions and leave out important details (and newer AIs are worse). Summaries from questions about "the news" are allegedly inaccurate 29% of the time and 53% have significant issues (but this study has a big conflict of interest). I don't have data on video summaries, but from what I've read they can make stuff up and don't understand things like sarcasm.
https://futurism.com/ai-chatbots-summarizing-research
https://www.dw.com/en/chatbot-ai-artificial-intelligence-chatgpt-google-gemini-news-misinformation-fact-check-copilot-v2/a-74392921
Yup. Anyone who uses AI summaries instantly has their opinions and retorts wholeheartedly dismissed with prejudice.