Even then it'll either be a disagreement on aesthetics, or one position will be shown to be objectively correct. It's why lolbertardianism and neo-koshervatism are now relics of the past.
It sounds kind of good if like SM1 you're charitable in interpreting it to mean diversity of viewpoint or different perspectives or backgrounds. For instance, a botanist working with a cryptographer will have much better chance at the Voynich manuscript than two cryptographers.
But they mean it in the sense that "my truth" and "the truth" are better than just the truth. "My truth" as a synonym for opinion is never a positive contribution.
Even then it'll either be a disagreement on aesthetics, or one position will be shown to be objectively correct. It's why lolbertardianism and neo-koshervatism are now relics of the past.
Diversity of opinion is their language.
It sounds kind of good if like SM1 you're charitable in interpreting it to mean diversity of viewpoint or different perspectives or backgrounds. For instance, a botanist working with a cryptographer will have much better chance at the Voynich manuscript than two cryptographers.
But they mean it in the sense that "my truth" and "the truth" are better than just the truth. "My truth" as a synonym for opinion is never a positive contribution.