Here is the actual video he is referring to. It's an hour long and so haven't had time to go through it fully but one of the key things I noted was around 21:00 she rejects gender representation in the Diet.
All in all, it's a better statement that the new pm points against ISLAMIC immigration to Japan than anything.
Even then it'll either be a disagreement on aesthetics, or one position will be shown to be objectively correct. It's why lolbertardianism and neo-koshervatism are now relics of the past.
It sounds kind of good if like SM1 you're charitable in interpreting it to mean diversity of viewpoint or different perspectives or backgrounds. For instance, a botanist working with a cryptographer will have much better chance at the Voynich manuscript than two cryptographers.
But they mean it in the sense that "my truth" and "the truth" are better than just the truth. "My truth" as a synonym for opinion is never a positive contribution.
I think there's a bit of confusion, when I say 'diversity of opinion', I mean amongst those that CAN debate.
A monarchist, a conservative, A democracy advocate, A libertarian etc can all debate and even come to a consensus on issues.
Feminists DON'T debate, communists don't, leftists don't. They only seek subjugation so as such, can ONLY be treated as a hostile entity with no concessions.
The video is a really hard to watch because of her broken English.
But one of the things she says is something along the lines of “the diversity folks are the real racists because they apply stereotypes and we should look at all people as individuals”
Big fucking red flag.
Also keep in mind she is a “hafu” foreign blood. Her entire identity - and I do mean entire life - has been defined by her ethnic difference from standard Japanese. She would have been made distinctly aware of that since birth.
Here is the actual video he is referring to. It's an hour long and so haven't had time to go through it fully but one of the key things I noted was around 21:00 she rejects gender representation in the Diet.
All in all, it's a better statement that the new pm points against ISLAMIC immigration to Japan than anything.
When has "diversity," "change" or "stop hate speech" ever worked out well in the past? Genuine question.
Diversity of opinion is the ONLY one that truly matters as the only reason we are having to go hardline is the opposing side rejects ALL debate.
Because we can, they can't.
Even then it'll either be a disagreement on aesthetics, or one position will be shown to be objectively correct. It's why lolbertardianism and neo-koshervatism are now relics of the past.
Diversity of opinion is their language.
It sounds kind of good if like SM1 you're charitable in interpreting it to mean diversity of viewpoint or different perspectives or backgrounds. For instance, a botanist working with a cryptographer will have much better chance at the Voynich manuscript than two cryptographers.
But they mean it in the sense that "my truth" and "the truth" are better than just the truth. "My truth" as a synonym for opinion is never a positive contribution.
I don't believe in diversity of political opinions for the workplace. If you're a feminist, you should be shut out.
Go ahead and disagree with me, but it's the bare minimum we need to claw our way back.
I think there's a bit of confusion, when I say 'diversity of opinion', I mean amongst those that CAN debate.
A monarchist, a conservative, A democracy advocate, A libertarian etc can all debate and even come to a consensus on issues.
Feminists DON'T debate, communists don't, leftists don't. They only seek subjugation so as such, can ONLY be treated as a hostile entity with no concessions.
The video is a really hard to watch because of her broken English.
But one of the things she says is something along the lines of “the diversity folks are the real racists because they apply stereotypes and we should look at all people as individuals”
Big fucking red flag.
Also keep in mind she is a “hafu” foreign blood. Her entire identity - and I do mean entire life - has been defined by her ethnic difference from standard Japanese. She would have been made distinctly aware of that since birth.