He just hasn't had much of a filter to know what things are supposedly taboo. That's what people like about him.

I already made the comparison in another thread, but it's similar to Trump. Nick will say something true*, but verboten. Something like "Hitler has aura" or "Hitler wasn't uniquely evil." Both are true statements; Hitler was clearly charismatic, clearly committed monstrous acts, but was also made into the literal Devil in modern geopolitical mythology. Yet the media still needs to lie about Fuentes, and make it out like he said even worse stuff. I think Nick has said he likes Hitler, but the clips I've seen from the media tend to be the other ones I mentioned...but then they act like they can't understand nuance, and claim he's saying he loves Hitler.

You can disagree, you can find it distasteful, you can agree it should be taboo and verboten, but those statements are just correct...and the media still lied about what he said. That's going to make people appreciate him, if not fully like him or side with him.

I still think Nick is a toxic commodity, I'd rather not be forced into association with him, and I'm not a fan...but I'm also tired of the 'disavow' game. I do not disavow Nick Fuentes. I'm not a fan, but I refuse to play their game and say he's evil, either. For better or worse, he's rising, and he's the voice of a generation. I'm glad parts of his message are being boosted, and I hope he stays the coarse. Nick Fuentes is a force, that's undeniable. I hope he's a force for good.

• Not always; he can be full of shit too, or just off base, but in my example let's take the true stuff he says.